The West Hmongic languages, also known as Chuanqiandian Miao () and Western Miao, are a major branch of the Hmongic languages of China and Southeast Asia.
The name Chuanqiandian is used both for West Hmongic as a whole and for one of its branches, the Chuanqiandian cluster.
Names
Autonyms include:
- Hmong (Bijie and Wenshan Prefecture, Guizhou)
- Huishui Miao (Huishui County, Qiannan Prefecture, Guizhou)
- Mashan Miao (Ziyun County, Anshun, Guizhou)
- Luobo River Miao (Fuquan, Qiannan Prefecture, Guizhou)
- A-Hmao (Weining County, Bijie, Guizhou; Zhaotong and Chuxiong Prefecture, Yunnan)
Classification
West Hmongic is the most diverse branch of the Hmong (Miao) language family. There are nine primary branches in Chinese sources, though the unity of these are not accepted in all Western sources.
Items marked <sup>â¡</sup> have been split into individual languages (and not kept together) by either Matisoff or Strecker; all of these are branches of Miao listed with subbranches in Chinese sources. The other three (A-Hmao, A-Hmyo, Gejia) are not so divided in either Chinese or Western sources. The three divisions of the Chuanqiandian cluster are only as divergent as the divisions of the other branches marked <sup>â¡</sup>, but are listed separately due to the internal complexity of Hmong.
The various varieties of Pingtang, new branches of Guiyang and Mashan, and Matisoff's Raojia and Pa Na are not listed in Ethnologue 16 and have no ISO codes. Matisoff (2006) gives very different names, and it's not clear how these correspond to the branches listed here.
Wang (1983)
Wang Fushi, summarized in English by David Strecker, emphasized the diversity of Western Hmongic. The names below are from Strecker; Wang did not assign names, but identified the districts where the varieties were spoken.
Chuanqiandian (SichuanâÂÂGuizhouâÂÂYunnan)
These are not all established as unitary branches, however. In a follow-up, Strecker broke up BuâÂÂNao on the basis of newly accessible data, and noted that several of the languages listed by Wang (marked "?" above) were unclassified due to lack of data and had not been demonstrated to be West Hmongic. The other groups are then listed as unclassified within Hmongic, and not specifically West Hmongic. However, Wang (1994) identified two as varieties of Guiyang. The eight unclassified languages are all spoken in a small area of south-central Guizhou, along with Guiyang, Huishui, Mashan, and Luobo River Miao. These were later addressed by Li Yunbing (2000).
Wang (1985)
Wang Fushi later grouped the Western Miao languages into eight primary divisions. Datapoint locations of representative dialects are from Li Yunbing (2000:237), all of which are located in Guizhou province, China.
- Chuanqiandian Miao
- Lect 1 (1,100,000 speakers; representative dialect: Dananshan 大åÂÂ山寨, Xiaoshao township å°Âå¨èÂÂæÂÂ乡, Bijie city)<br>The Tuhe Ã¥ÂÂæ²³ dialect is spoken in Xishui County, Guizhou.
- Lect 2 (70,000+ speakers; representative dialect: Xingfa township Ã¥Â
´åÂÂ乡, Hezhang County)
- Lect 3 (representative dialect: Zhuchang township çªåº乡, Zhijin County)
- Northeast Yunnan Miao (250,000 speakers; representative dialect: Shimenkan ç³é¨åÂÂ寨, Zhongshui district ä¸Âæ°´åº, Weining County)
- Guiyang Miao
- Northern (80,000 speakers; representative dialect: Baituo æÂÂæÂÂ寨, Qingyan township éÂÂ岩乡, Huaxi District è±溪åº, Guiyang city)
- Southwestern (65,000 speakers; representative dialect: Kaisa village 坿´ÂæÂÂ, Machang township 马åº乡, Pingba County)
- Southern (25,000 speakers; representative dialect: Wangjiashan 汪家山, Huayan township Ã¥ÂÂ严乡, Anshun city)
- Northwestern (7,000 speakers; representative dialect: Tieshi township éÂÂç³èÂÂæÂÂå½ÂæÂÂ乡, Qianxi County)
- Central (5,000 speakers; representative dialect: South-central Guiyang Miao, Hongyanzhai 红岩寨, Baiyun township ç½äºÂ乡, Ziyun County)
- Huishui Miao
- Northern (64,000 speakers; representative dialect: Jiading ç²å®Â寨, Gaopo township é«Âå¡èÂÂæÂÂ乡, Guiyang city)
- Western (52,000 speakers; representative dialect: Yarong Township é¸Âç»Â乡, Huishui County)
- Central (41,000 speakers; representative dialect: Baijin township æÂÂéÂÂ乡, Huishui County)
- Eastern (13,000 speakers; representative dialect: Xiguan township 西åÂ
³ä¹¡, Pingtang County)
- Mashan Miao
- Central (60,000 speakers; representative dialect: Jiaotuo ç»Âå¨寨, Zongdi township å®Âå°乡, Ziyun County)
- Northern (30,000 speakers; representative dialect: Baisuo township æÂÂæ¢Â乡, Changshun County)
- Western (12,000 speakers; representative dialect: Sidazhai Ã¥ÂÂ大寨, Houchang Township ç´åº乡, Ziyun County)
- Southern (9,000 speakers; representative dialect: Youquan village æ²¹åÂ
¨æÂÂ, Lekuan township ä¹Â宽乡, Wangmo County)
- Southwestern (5,000 speakers; representative dialect: Babangzhai å²Âæ£Â寨, Dalang township æÂÂç¼乡, Ziyun County)
- Southeastern (6,000 speakers; representative dialect: Babazhai æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂ寨, Moyin 模å¼Â乡, Wangmo County)
- Luobohe Miao (43,000 speakers; representative dialect: Yejipo éÂÂ鸡å¡寨, Ganba township çÂÂÃ¥ÂÂ乡, Fuquan County)
- Chong'anjiang Miao (44,000 speakers; representative dialect: Fengxiang æÂ«é¦Â寨, Chong'an township éÂÂå®Â乡, Huangping County)
- Pingtang Miao
- Northern (15,000 speakers; representative dialect: Shanglin village ä¸ÂæÂÂæÂÂ, Yuanjiatong township Ã¥ÂÂç²æ¡Â乡, Pingtang County)
- Eastern (5,000 speakers; representative dialect: Caozhai èÂÂ寨, Xinmin township æÂ°æ°Â乡, Dushan County)
- Southern (7,000 speakers; representative dialect: Pingyan 平岩乡, Luodian County)
- Western (3,500 speakers; representative dialect: Youmai village æ²¹è¿ÂæÂÂ, Youmai township æ²¹è¿Â乡, Wangmo County)
The above classification was later revised by Li Jinping & Li Tianyi (2012:285) to include 7 dialects instead of the 8 given by Wang; Pingtang Miao is excluded.
- Western Miao (representative dialect: Dananshan, Yanzikou, Bijie è´µå·Âæ¯ÂèÂÂçÂÂÃ¥ÂÂå£éÂÂ大åÂÂå±±)
- Chuanqiandian Miao (representative dialect: Damiaozhai, Jichang, Bijie è´µå·Âæ¯ÂèÂÂÃ¥ÂÂåº大èÂÂ寨)
- Lect 1
- Lect 2
- Guiyang Miao (representative dialect: Guankou, Machang, Pingba è´µå·Âå¹³åÂÂ马åºåÂ
³å£)
- Northern
- Western
- Southern
- Huishui Miao (representative dialect: Jiading, Gaopo, Huaxi, Guiyang è´µå·Âè´µé³è±溪é«Âå¡ç²å®Â)
- Northern
- Western
- Central
- Eastern
- Mashan Miao (representative dialect: Dalong, Dayun, Ziyun è´µå·Âç´«äºÂ大äºÂ大é¾Â)
- Central
- Northern
- Western
- Southern
- Northeast Yunnan Miao (representative dialect: Shimenkan, Weining è´µå·Âå¨Âå®Âç³é¨ç Â)
- Luobohe Miao (representative dialect: Yejipo, Xinqiao, Fuquan è´µå·Âç¦Âæ³ÂæÂ°æ¡¥éÂÂ鸡å¡)
- Chong'anjiang Miao (representative dialect: Fengxiang, Chongxing, Huangping è´µå·Âé»Âå¹³éÂÂÃ¥Â
´æÂ«é¦Â)
Li (2000)
Li Yunbing classified those varieties left unclassified by Wang, grouping four of them together as an eighth branch of West Hmongic, Pingtang. He identified Luodian Muyin and Wangmo (using Strecker's names) as varieties of Mashan. Wang (1994) had already established Qianxi and Ziyun as varieties of Guiyang. This classification is repeated in Wu and Yang (2010):
- Chuanqiandian cluster (å·Âé»Âæ» ChuÃÂnqiándiÃÂn)
- A-Hmao (æ»Âä¸Âå DiÃÂndÃ
ÂngbÃÂi)
- Guiyang Miao (è´µé³ Guìyáng)
- Huishui Miao (æÂ æ°´ HuìshuÃÂ)
- Mashan Miao (麻山 MáshÃÂn)
- A-Hmyo (ç½Âæ³Âæ²³ Luóbóhé)
- Gejia (éÂÂå®Âæ± Chóng'ÃÂnjiÃÂng)
- Pingtang Miao (平塠PÃÂngtáng)
The varieties analyzed by Li Yunbing (2000) are:
- Guiyang Miao
- (also called Jiucai Miao éÂÂèÂÂèÂÂ) in Hongyan, Baiyun township, Ziyun County ç´«äºÂå¿ç½äºÂ乡红岩寨; 4,000 speaker
- in Tieshi township, Qianxi County é»Â西å¿éÂÂç³èÂÂæÂÂå½ÂæÂÂ乡
- Pingtang Miao
- in Jiatong township, Pingtang County å¹³å¡Âå¿ç²æ¡Â乡 (currently Kaluo å¡ç½Â乡); 11,000 speakers
- in Xinmin township, Dushan County ç¬山å¿æÂ°æ°Â乡; 4,000+ speakers
- (also called Red Miao 红èÂÂ) in Pingyan, Luodian County ç½Âç¸å¿平岩乡; 6,000 speakers
- in Youmai, Wangmo County æÂÂè°Âå¿油è¿Â乡; 3,000 speakers
- Mashan Miao
- (also called Cotton Miao æ£Âè±èÂÂ; Bouyei: ) in Dalang, Ziyun County ç´«äºÂå¿æÂÂç¼乡; 4,000 speakers
- in Moyin, Luodian County ç½Âç¸å¿模å¼Â乡; 4,000+ speakers
Li (2000) considers Raojia () of Heba æ²³åÂÂ, Majiang County, to be a separate dialect of Hmu (East Hmongic). It has 5,000 speakers in Majiang County, and 10,000 speakers total.
BuâÂÂNao was not included because the speakers are classified by the Chinese government as ethnically Yao rather than Miao.
Matisoff (2001)
James Matisoff outlined the following in 2001. Not all languages are necessarily listed.
Western Hmong
- Libo Miao (= ?, maybe BuâÂÂNao)
- Weining Miao (= A-Hmao / Large Flowery Miao?)
- Guangshun Miao (Yi Miao) (= ?)
- SichuanâÂÂGuizhouâÂÂYunnan (= Chuanqiandian cluster)
- Petchabun (White Hmong)
- Green Hmong (Blue Hmong)
- Suyong Miao (Magpie Miao)
- Chuan Miao (Western Sichuan Miao)
- Huajie Miao (= ?)
Mortensen (2004)
David Mortensen argues for the following classification of Western Hmongic based on shared tonal innovations, including tone sandhi. Pingtang, Luobohe, and Chong'anjiang are not addressed.
Ratliff (2010)
Martha Ratliff includes three languages specifically:
The last contradicts Matisoff (2001), who had posited a Bunu branch of Hmongic with BuâÂÂNao in it, but recapitulates Strecker (1987). The other Western varieties are not addressed, though some are included in her reconstruction of Proto-HmongâÂÂMien.
Castro & Gu (2010): Wenshan
Andy Castro and Gu Chawen divide the Hmong dialects of Wenshan Prefecture, Yunnan, into four subdivisions, listed from east to west.
- (, 'Lopsided Miao'; most divergent)
- (, , 'White Miao')
- Shib-Nzhuab (, 'Green Miao')
- Soud-Bes-Buak (, 'Flowery Miao')
The dialects given above are named after the groups they are spoken by.
Castro, Flaming & Luo (2012): Honghe
Castro, Flaming & Luo (2012) found that there are 4 different West Hmongic languages in Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan.
- Northern Hua Miao
- Southern Hua Miao
- White Miao
- Sinicised Miao
Castro, Flaming & Luo (2012) propose the following classification for the Western Miao dialects of southeastern Yunnan, which is based on Michael Johnson's 1998 classification of Western Miao dialects.
- Western Miao [Hmong]
- Sinicised Miao
- ()
- ()
- Farwestern Miao
- White Miao
- ()
- Northern Hua Miao
- Standard Western Miao
- ()
- ()
- ()
- Black Miao
- ()
- ()
- Southern Hua Miao
- ()
- ()
- ()
- ()
Writing
The Miao languages were traditionally written with various adaptations of Chinese characters. Around 1905, Sam Pollard introduced a Romanized script for the A-Hmao language, and this came to be used for Hmong Daw (Chuanqiandian) as well. In the United States, the Romanized Popular Alphabet is often used for White and Green Hmong (also Chuanqiandian).
In China, pinyin-based Latin alphabets have been devised for ChuanqiandianâÂÂspecifically the variety of Dananshan (), Yanzikou Town (), BijieâÂÂand A-Hmao. Wu and Yang (2010) report attempts at writing Mashan in 1985 and an improvement by them; they recommend that standards should be developed for each of the six other primary varieties of West Hmongic.
References
- Li Jinping, Li Tianyi [æÂÂé¦平, æÂÂ天翼]. 2012. A comparative study of Miao dialects [èÂÂè¯ÂæÂ¹è¨Âæ¯Âè¾Âç Âç©¶]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press.