In mathematics, a set A is a subset of a set B if and only if all elements of A are also elements of B; B is then a superset of A. It is possible for A and B to be equal; if they are unequal, then A is a proper subset of B. The relationship of one set being a subset of another is called inclusion (or sometimes containment). A is a subset of B may also be expressed as B includes (or contains) A or A is included (or contained) in B. A k-subset is a subset with k elements.
When quantified, is represented as
One can prove the statement by applying a proof technique known as the element argument:<blockquote>Let sets A and B be given. To prove that
</blockquote>The validity of this technique can be seen as a consequence of universal generalization: the technique shows for an arbitrarily chosen element c. Universal generalisation then implies which is equivalent to as stated above.
If A and B are sets and every element of A is also an element of B, then:
If A is a subset of B, but A is not equal to B (i.e. there exists at least one element of B which is not an element of A), then:
The empty set, written or has no elements, and therefore is vacuously a subset of any set X.
Some authors use the symbols and to indicate and respectively; that is, with the same meaning as and instead of the symbols and . For example, for these authors, it is true of every set A that (a reflexive relation).
Other authors prefer to use the symbols and to indicate (also called strict) subset and superset respectively; that is, with the same meaning as and instead of the symbols and This usage makes and analogous to the inequality symbols and For example, if then x may or may not equal y, but if then x definitely does not equal y, and is less than y (an irreflexive relation). Similarly, using the convention that is proper subset, if then A may or may not equal B, but if then A definitely does not equal B.
Another example in an Euler diagram:
The set of all subsets of is called its power set, and is denoted by .
The inclusion relation is a partial order on the set defined by . We may also partially order by reverse set inclusion by defining
For the power set of a set S, the inclusion partial order isâÂÂup to an order isomorphismâÂÂthe Cartesian product of (the cardinality of S) copies of the partial order on for which This can be illustrated by enumerating , and associating with each subset (i.e., each element of ) the k-tuple from of which the ith coordinate is 1 if and only if is a member of T.
The set of all -subsets of is denoted by , in analogue with the notation for binomial coefficients, which count the number of -subsets of an -element set. In set theory, the notation is also common, especially when is a transfinite cardinal number.