In chemistry, a (redox) non-innocent ligand is a ligand in a metal complex where the oxidation state is not clear. Typically, complexes containing non-innocent ligands are redox active at mild potentials. The concept assumes that redox reactions in metal complexes are either metal or ligand localized, which is a simplification, albeit a useful one.
C.K. Jørgensen first described ligands as "innocent" and "suspect": "Ligands are innocent when they allow oxidation states of the central atoms to be defined. The simplest case of a suspect ligand is NO..."
Conventionally, redox reactions of coordination complexes are assumed to be metal-centered. The reduction of MnO<sub>4</sub><sup>âÂÂ</sup> to MnO<sub>4</sub><sup>2âÂÂ</sup> is described by the change in oxidation state of manganese from +7 to +6. The oxide ligands do not change in oxidation state, remaining âÂÂ2. Oxide is an innocent ligand. Another example of conventional metal-centered redox couple is <nowiki>[</nowiki>Co(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub><nowiki>]</nowiki><sup>3+</sup>/[Co(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>. Ammonia is innocent in this transformation.
Redox non-innocent behavior of ligands is illustrated by nickel bis(stilbenedithiolate) ([Ni(S<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>Ph<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>z</sup>). As all bis(1,2-dithiolene) complexes of nd<sup>8</sup> metal ions, three oxidation states can be identified: z = âÂÂ2, âÂÂ1, and 0. If the ligands are always considered to be dianionic (as is done in formal oxidation state counting), then z = 0 requires that that nickel has a formal oxidation state of +4. The formal oxidation state of the central nickel atom therefore ranges from +2 to +4 in the above transformations (see Figure). However, the formal oxidation state is different from the real (spectroscopic) oxidation state based on the (spectroscopic) metal d-electron configuration. The stilbene-1,2-dithiolate behaves as a redox non-innocent ligand, and the oxidation processes actually take place at the ligands rather than the metal. This leads to the formation of ligand radical complexes. The charge-neutral complex (z =0), showing a partial singlet diradical character, is therefore better described as a Ni<sup>2+</sup> derivative of the radical anion S<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>Ph<sub>2</sub><sup>â¢âÂÂ</sup>. The diamagnetism of this complex arises from anti-ferromagnetic coupling between the unpaired electrons of the two ligand radicals. Another example is higher oxidation states of copper complexes of diamido phenyl ligands that are stabilized by intramolecular multi center hydrogen bonding
Ligands with extended pi-delocalization such as porphyrins, phthalocyanines, and corroles and ligands with the generalised formulas [D-CR=CR-D]<sup>nâÂÂ</sup> (D = O, S, NRâ and R, R' = alkyl or aryl) are often non-innocent. In contrast, [D-CR=CR-CR=D]<sup>âÂÂ</sup> such as NacNac or acac are innocent.
In certain enzymatic processes, redox non-innocent cofactors provide redox equivalents to complement the redox properties of metalloenzymes. Of course, most redox reactions in nature involve innocent systems, e.g. [4Fe-4S] clusters. The additional redox equivalents provided by redox non-innocent ligands are also used as controlling factors to steer homogeneous catalysis.
<div style="display: table-cell; width:300px; padding-left:50px;" >:</div> <div style="display: table-cell; vertical-align:center " >Porphyrin ligands can be innocent (âÂÂ2) or noninnocent (âÂÂ1). In the enzymes chloroperoxidase and cytochrome P450, the porphyrin ligand sustains oxidation during the catalytic cycle, notably in the formation of Compound I. In other heme proteins, such as myoglobin, ligand-centered redox does not occur and the porphyrin is innocent.</div>