Husein Gradaà ¡ÃÂevià(Husein-kapetan) (31 August 1802 â 17 August 1834), also known as Zmaj od Bosne (lit. 'Dragon of Bosnia'), was an Ottoman Bosnian military commander who led an uprising against the Tanzimat, a system of political reforms with aim to modernise the Ottoman Empire. Born into a Bosnian noble family, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàbecame the captain of GradaÃÂac in the early 1820s, succeeding his relatives (among whom was his father) in the position. He grew up surrounded by a political climate of turmoil in the western reaches of the Ottoman Empire. With the Russo-Turkish war (1828âÂÂ29), Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviÃÂ's importance rose; the Bosnian governor gave him the task of mobilising an army between the Drina and Vrbas.
By 1830, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàbecame the spokesman of all Ottoman captains in Bosnia and coordinated the defence in light of a possible Serbian invasion. Sparked by Ottoman Sultan Mahmud II's reforms that abolished the Janissaries and weakened the privileges of the nobility, and the autonomy and territory granted to the Principality of Serbia, much of the Bosnian nobility united and revolted. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas chosen as the leader and claimed the title of Vizier. This uprising, with goals of autonomy, lasted three years and included the termination of Ottoman loyals mainly in Herzegovina. Among notable accomplishments, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàled forces victorious against the Ottoman field marshal in Kosovo. The uprising failed, and all captaincies were abolished by 1835. Temporarily exiled to Austria, he negotiated his return with the Sultan and was allowed to enter all of the Ottoman Empire except Bosnia. He died under controversial circumstances in 1834 and was most probably buried in the backyard of the Eyup Mosque in Istanbul, or nearby Eyüp Cemetery.
Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàreceived the honorific "the Dragon of Bosnia" (), and is considered a Bosniak national hero.
Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviÃÂ's family originates from Buda in present-day Hungary, who came to Bosnia in the late 17th century.
Husein was born in the town of GradaÃÂac (in northern Bosnia), to Osman and his wife Touley Hanuma in 1802, at the Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàfamily house. Outside of family tradition and folklore invented much later, little is known of his childhood. It is said that he spent much time around the family fort while it was undergoing renovations. He grew up during turbulent times and, taking into account his father's military experience and brother Osman's services during the 1813 war against Serbia, young Husein surely heard many first-hand accounts that shaped his personality.
Osman senior died in 1812 when Husein was merely ten years old. Certain scholars have argued that his mother was also dead by then, although some family traditions claim otherwise. By all accounts, his mother strongly influenced Husein's upbringing. Upon his father's death, Husein deferred to his eldest brother Murat because of his age and status as successor to the GradaÃÂac captaincy Husein Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàrose to the head of the GradaÃÂac military captaincy only after his brother Murat was poisoned in the 1821 by rival aristocrats attempting to gain the favour of the desperate Grand Vizier.
Husein married Hanifa, sister of Captain Mahmud of Derventa, at an early age. Although the exact date is unknown, his son Muhamed Bey Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas probably born no later than 1822 when Husein was twenty years old. The pair would also have a daughter, à  efika, born in 1833. Neither Muhamed nor à  efika were known to have had children themselves.
When Husein took over the GradaÃÂac captaincy, he focused most of his attention on the administration of internal affairs. Notably, all of Husein's construction projects were related to the city of GradaÃÂac and its immediate area. During his rule, GradaÃÂac further expanded its status as one of the most prosperous captaincies in Bosnia.
The first and most notable construction was that of the GradaÃÂac Castle. The fort had existed for decades and was subject to extensive renovations since the time of Captain Mehmed in 1765. Husein's father Osman, and brother Murat had done some work as well, in 1808 and 1818âÂÂ19, respectively. However, the exact nature of Husein's contribution is unknown. The castle's tower has long been associated with Husein, but architectural evidence points to the tower existing alongside the rest of the complex from earlier times. It seems likely that Husein was merely responsible for a significant renovation of the tower that lingered in the people's memory.
Husein did have a new castle built, in a large project which included the construction of an artificial island surrounded by a moat up to 100 meters wide and of great depth. The castle was named ÃÂardak and the surrounding village quickly derived its name from it. The walls were oval, the entire structure being seventeen meters long and eight meters wide. The complex and area also included a mosque, wells, a fishery, and hunting grounds.
Within the GradaÃÂac city walls, Husein's most significant contribution to the city was the clock tower (,) which was built in 1824. The object's base is 5.5 by 5.5 meters, while the height is 21.50 meters. It was the last object of this type to be built in Bosnia.
Some 40 to 50 meters outside the city walls lies Husein's greatest architectural contribution to GradaÃÂac: the Husejnija mosque. Built in 1826, it features an octagonal dome roof and a particularly high minaret of 25 m. Three smaller octagonal domes are found above the verandah. Islamic decorations and artistry are seen on the door and surrounding wall as well as the interior. The entire complex is surrounded by a small stone wall and gate.
Husein's rule in GradaÃÂac was also notable because of his tolerance towards the Christian populace under his jurisdiction; both Catholic and Orthodox. Though social norms of the time dictated that the Ottoman sultan's official approval was necessary for the construction of any non-Islamic religious buildings, Husein approved the construction of several such buildings without it. A Catholic school was built in the village of Tolisa in 1823, followed by a large church that could hold 1,500 people. Another two Catholic churches were built in the villages of Dubrave and Garevac, while an Orthodox church was built in the hamlet of Obudovac. During Husein's captaincy, the Christians in GradaÃÂac were known to be the most satisfied in Bosnia.
Husein entered the higher political scene in Bosnia in 1827, largely due to the impending Russo-Turkish War (1828âÂÂ1829) and his role in preparing the defence of the boundaries of Bosnia. Upon receiving orders from the Bosnian vizier Abdurahim Pasha, Husein mobilised the GradaÃÂac populace and strengthened his defences. During talks held in Sarajevo between the vizier and the Bosnian captains, it is said that Husein stayed the longest to discuss strategy. He was appointed commander of an army that he was to mobilise from the lands between the Drina to the Vrbas. By all accounts, he did a satisfactory job. However, in mid-June 1828, Husein had to rush to Sarajevo with a small accompanying force to get the vizier to safety following a revolt among the troops.
By 1830, Husein had risen to new political heights as he was able to speak on behalf of all (or at least most of) the captains of Bosnia. At that time, he was coordinating the defence of Bosnia against a possible invasion by Serbia, as well as taking it upon himself to address Austrian authorities and warn them against any incursion across the Sava. The authority he wielded in the later years of his captaincy in GradaÃÂac explains the great role he was to have in the years to follow.
In the late 1820s, Sultan Mahmud II reintroduced a set of reforms that called for further expansion of the centrally controlled army (nizam), new taxes and more Ottoman bureaucracy. These reforms weakened the special status and privileges of the Bosnian Muslim nobility. Many Bosnian leaders had also been disappointed by the Ottoman neglect of the plight of the Muslim refugees arriving from the Principality of Serbia. Contrary to popular belief, however, Husein Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas not greatly opposed to these reforms.
In 1826, during the Auspicious Incident, Sultan Mahmud II abolished the Janissaries, through the use of military force, executions and exile. Mahmud II then banned the revered Bektashi Order and decreed his Turkish commanders to launch campaigns against prominent Balkan Muslim leaders, causing great instability in Rumelia. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviÃÂ's immediate reaction to the abolition of the Janissaries was not unlike that of the rest of the Bosnian aristocracy; Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàthreatened to subdue anybody opposed to the Sarajevo Janissaries. When the Janissaries killed naqib al-ashraf Imam Nurudin-effendi à  erifoviÃÂ, however, his tone shifted and he rapidly distanced himself from their cause. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàdid realise that economic hardship was the main reason for Janissary dissent. After this, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàgenerally maintained good relations with imperial authorities in Bosnia. When Abdurahim Pasha became vizier in 1827, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas said to have become one of his more trusted advisors. This culminated in Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviÃÂ's large role in the Bosnian mobilisation for the Russo-Ottoman war. Following a riot in the Sarajevo camp during these preparations, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàeven provided shelter for the ousted Abdurahim Pasha in GradaÃÂac before assisting him in his escape from the country. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas also relatively loyal to Abdurahim's successor, Namñk Pasha, reinforcing Ottoman garrisons in à  abac upon his orders.
The turning point for Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàcame with the end of the Russo-Ottoman War and the Treaty of Adrianople on 14 September 1829. According to the provisions of the treaty, the Ottoman Empire had to grant autonomy to Serbia, and also cede it six districts. This outraged the Bosnian nobility, launching numerous protests.
Between 20 and 31 December 1830, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàhosted a gathering of Bosniak aristocrats in GradaÃÂac. A month later, from 20 January to 5 February, another meeting was held in Tuzla to prepare for a revolt. From there, a call was issued to the Bosnian Muslim populace asking them to rise to the defence of Bosnia. It was then that the popular Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas unofficially chosen to head the rebellion. Further details of this meeting are murky and disputable. According to certain contemporary sources, their demands from Constantinople were:
Another outcome of the Tuzla meeting was an agreement that another general meeting should be held in Travnik. Since Travnik was the seat of the Bosnia Eyalet and of the vizier, the planned meeting was in effect a confrontation with Ottoman authority. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàthus asked all involved to help assemble an army beforehand. On 29 March 1831, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàset out towards Travnik with some 4,000 men.
Upon hearing the word of the oncoming force, Namñk Pasha is said to have gone to the Travnik fort and called the Sulejmanpaà ¡iàbrothers to his aid. When the rebel army arrived in Travnik, they fired several warning shots at the castle, warning the vizier that they were prepared for a military encounter. Meanwhile, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàsent a detachment of his forces, under the command of Memià ¡-aga of Srebrenica, to meet Sulejmanpaà ¡iÃÂ's reinforcements. The two sides met at Pirot, on the outskirts of Travnik, on 7 April. There, Memià ¡-aga defeated the Sulejmanpaà ¡iàbrothers and their 2,000-man army, forcing them to retreat and destroying the possessions of the Sulejmanpaà ¡iàfamily. On 21 May, Namñk Pasha fled to Stolac following a short siege. Soon afterwards, Husein Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas honourably proclaimed the "commander of Bosnia, chosen by the will of the people". On 31 May, he demanded that all Bosnian aristocrats immediately join his army, and called on the general populace who wished to do so. Thousands rushed to join him, among them being numerous Christians, who were said to comprise up to a third of his total forces. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàsplit his army in two, leaving one part of it in Zvornik to defend against a possible Serbian incursion. With the bulk of the troops, he set out towards Kosovo to meet the Grand vizier, who had been sent with a large army to quell the rebellion. Along the way, he took the city of Peàwith a 25,000-strong army and proceeded to Prià ¡tina, where he set up his main camp.
The encounter with Grand Vizier Reà Âid Mehmed Pasha happened on 18 July near à  timlje. Although both armies were of roughly equal size, the Grand Vizier's troops had superior arms. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàsent a part of his army under the command of Ali Pasha FidahiÃÂ, the captain (kapetan) and sanjak-bey of Zvornik, ahead to meet Reà Âid Pasha's forces. Following a small skirmish, Fihadiàfeigned a retreat. Thinking that victory was within reach, the Grand Vizier sent his cavalry and artillery into forested terrain. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàimmediately took advantage of this tactical error and executed a punishing counterattack with the bulk of his forces, almost annihilating the Ottoman forces. Reà Âid Pasha himself was injured and barely escaped with his life.
Following claims from the Grand Vizier that the Sultan would meet all Bosnian demands if the rebel army returned home, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàand his army turned back. On 10 August, the leadership of the rebellion met at Prià ¡tina and decided that Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwould be declared Vizier of Bosnia. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàrefused at first but eventually accepted. This was made official at an assembly held in Sarajevo on 12 September, where in front of the Tsar's Mosque, those present swore on the Quran to be loyal to Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàand declared that, despite potential failure and death, there would be no turning back.
At this point, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas not only the supreme military commander but Bosnia's leading civilian authority as well. He established a court around him, and after initially making himself at home in Sarajevo, he moved the centre of Bosnian politics to Travnik, making it the de facto capital of the rebel state. In Travnik, he established a divan, a Bosnian congress, which together with him made up the Bosnian government. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàalso collected taxes at this time and executed various local opponents of the autonomy movement. He gained a reputation as a hero and a strong, brave, and decisive ruler. One anecdote that illustrates this is Captain Husein's alleged response to whether he was scared of waging war against the Ottoman Empire.
During this lull in armed conflict with the Ottomans, attention was turned to the autonomy movement's strong opposition in Herzegovina. A small campaign was launched against the region from three different directions:
As it happened, Namñk Pasha had already abandoned Stolac, so this attack was put on hold. The attack on Gacko was a failure as the forces from Posavina and south Podrinje were defeated by ÃÂengiÃÂ's troops. There was one success, however; in October, Husein Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàhad deployed an army under the command of Ahmed-beg ResulbegoviÃÂ, who had put his life in danger while attempting to capture Trebinje from ResulbegoviÃÂ's loyalist and heavily armed cousins.
A Bosnian delegation reached the Grand Vizier's camp in Skopje in November and was promised that the Grand Vizier would insist on the Sultan to accept Bosnian demands and appoint Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàas the official Vizier of an autonomous Bosnia. His true intentions, however, were manifested by early December when he attacked Bosnian rebel units stationed on the outskirts of Novi Pazar. Yet again, the rebel army handed a defeat to the imperial forces. Due to a particularly strong winter, though, the Bosnian troops were forced to return home.
Meanwhile, in Bosnia, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàdecided to carry on his campaign against the captains in Herzegovina who were loyal to the Sultan, despite the unfavourable climate. The captain of Livno, Ibrahim-beg Fidrus, was ordered to launch a final attack against the local captains and to thus end all domestic opposition to the autonomy movement. To achieve this, Fidrus first attacked Ljubuà ¡ki and the local captain Sulejman-beg, whom he defeated and then secured the whole of Herzegovina except Stolac in the process. Unfortunately, the rebel detachments that laid siege to the Stolac Fortress met cannon fire and ambushes organised by Ali-paà ¡a Rizvanbegoviàin early March of the next year. Receiving information that the Bosnian ranks were depleted due to the winter, Rizvanbegoviàbroke the siege, counterattacking the rebels and dispersing their forces; in doing so he proved that his fortress at Stolac was nearly impregnable. Husein Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviÃÂ, knowing of the eventual outcome, sent another well-equipped force towards Stolac from Sarajevo, under the command of Mujaga Zlatar, but it was ordered back on 16 March after receiving news of a major offensive on Bosnia being planned by the Grand Vizier.
The Ottoman campaign began in early February. The Grand Vizier sent two armies: one from VuÃÂitrn and one from Shkodër. Both armies headed toward Sarajevo, and Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàsent an army of around 10,000 men to meet them. When the Vizier's troops succeeded in crossing the Drina, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàordered 6,000 men under Ali-paà ¡a Fidahiàto meet them in Rogatica while units stationed in Vià ¡egrad were to head to Pale on the outskirts of Sarajevo. The encounter between the two sides finally happened on the Glasinac plains to the east of Sarajevo, near Sokolac, at the end of May. The Bosnian army was led by Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàhimself, while the Ottoman troops were under the command of Kara Mahmud Hamdi-paà ¡a, the new imperially recognised vizier of Bosnia. In this first encounter, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas forced to retreat to Pale. The fighting continued in Pale and Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas once again forced to retreat; this time to Sarajevo. There, a council of captains decided that the fight would continue.
By 1832, after a series of smaller clashes, a decisive battle occurred outside Sarajevo; although Husein Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas initially successful, he was defeated when Serbian rebels arrived and sided with and reinforced the forces of Mahmud II.
The final battle was played out on 4 June at Stup, a small locality on the road between Sarajevo and Ilidà ¾a. After a long, intense battle, it seemed Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàhad once again defeated the Sultan's army. Near the very end, however, Herzegovinian troops under the command of Ali-paà ¡a Rizvanbegoviàand Smail-aga ÃÂengiàbroke through defences Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàhad set up on his flank and joined the fighting. Overwhelmed by the unexpected attack from behind, the rebel army was forced to retreat into the city of Sarajevo itself. It was decided that further military resistance would be futile. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàfled to GradaÃÂac as the imperial army entered the city on 5 June and prepared to march on Travnik. Upon realising the difficulties that his home and family would experience if he stayed there, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàdecided to leave GradaÃÂac and continue on to Austrian lands instead.
If the choice to flee Bosnia was not already clear, the Sultan's furious fatwa declaring Gradaà ¡ÃÂevià"no good", an "evil-doer", a "traitor", a "criminal" and a "rebel" may have convinced Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàto leave. Due to various customs and procedures, however, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviÃÂ's departure from Bosnia was held up for several days. After pleading with Austrian officials to ease their restrictions, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàfinally reached the Sava River boundary with a large party of followers on 16 June. He crossed the river into Habsburg lands the same day, along with some 100 followers, servants, and family. Though he expected to be treated as a Bosnian vizier, he instead found himself held in quarantine in Slavonski Brod for nearly a month, with his weapons and many of his possessions taken away.
Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàand other rebels managed to flee across the Sava to Vinkovci and then Osijek, in Austrian territory. Some 66 men, 12 women, 135 servants and 252 horses accompanied him.
Austrian officials faced constant pressure from the Ottoman government to move Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàas far away from the border as possible. On 4 July he was moved to Osijek where he essentially lived in internment. His communications with the rest of his family and social circle were severely limited and he complained about his treatment to the authorities several times. His conditions would eventually improve, and before he left Osijek he remarked to local officials that he had enjoyed his stay there. Although intensely homesick and only partially in control of his destiny, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàretained his pride and dignity. He was said to have lived a luxurious life that included jousting competitions with his companions.
In late 1832, he agreed to return to Ottoman territory to receive a ferman of pardon from the Sultan. The terms, read to him in Zemun, were very harsh, insisting that Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviànot only never return to Bosnia, but also never to set foot on the European lands of the Ottoman Empire either. Disappointed, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas forced to obey the terms and rode on to Belgrade. He entered the city on 14 October in the manner of a true vizier, riding a horse decked out in silver and gold and accompanied by a large procession. He was greeted as a hero by the Muslims in Belgrade and treated like an equal by the local pasha. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàstayed in the city for two months, during which his health deteriorated (as was documented by the local doctor Bartolomeo Kunibert). He left the city for Constantinople in December, but as his daughter was still very young, his wife remained in Belgrade, joining him in the spring of the following year.
In Constantinople, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàlived in an old janissary barracks at atmejdan (Hippodrome square) while his family lived in a separate house nearby. He lived a relatively quiet life for the next two years, the only notable event being an offer from the Sultan for Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàto become a high-ranking pasha in the Nizami army; an offer that Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàindignantly refused.
He died in Constantinople in 1834 at the age of 32 under controversial circumstances, and was most probably buried in the backyard of the Eyup Mosque in Istanbul, or nearby Eyüp Cemetery.
Upon his death, he became something of a martyr for Bosnian pride. There was a well-known saying among Bosniaks that for years after his death not a single man among our people would be able to hear his name and not shed a tear. This positive sentiment was not exclusive to the Muslim population, as Christians from Posavina are thought to have shared a similar view for decades.
Although a majority of the Bosniaks in Herzegovina supported the cause of Husein Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviÃÂ, some of its ruling kapetans such as Ali-paà ¡a Rizvanbegoviàsupported Sultan Mahmud II for their gains, in the years that followed the Herzegovina kapetans suffered during the Herzegovina Uprising (1875âÂÂ1878) mainly due to the lack of a centralised authority in Bosnia Eyalet.
The first historical literature written about Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàcan be found in Safvet-beg Baà ¡agiÃÂ's work from 1900, A short introduction into the past of Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, due to historical differences between the Baà ¡agiàand Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàfamilies, Safvet-beg's view of Husein-kapetan is somewhat opinionated. A year later, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas mentioned by Kunibert in his works on the first Serbian Uprising, which painted a positive picture of Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàas a tragic hero.
In the years that followed, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas mentioned, either specifically or in the context of the movement he led, by D. PavloviÃÂ, Slavko KaluÃÂerÃÂiÃÂ, and Hamdija Kreà ¡evljakoviÃÂ. The general sentiment was that the autonomy movement was merely a reaction to imperial reforms by the Bosnian upper class. This view would be predominant among historians for decades. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàhad a minor resurgence during World War II when Ustaà ¡e launched a propaganda-rooted proposal to bring his remains back to Sarajevo.
During the time of Communist Yugoslavia, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàand his movement were rarely mentioned. The perceived upper-class resistance to the implementation of modern reforms did not go well with communist ideology. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas briefly mentioned in such a light by Avdo SuÃÂeska in his 1964 work on Bosnian captains. It would be another 24 years before Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàwas mentioned again. This time it was in Galib à  ljiva's 1988 work on Bosnia in the first half of the 19th century. Though several historiographical controversies were resolved, there was no significant shift in the perception of Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviÃÂ.
Since the Yugoslav Wars and the Bosniak National Awakening, Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàand his movement have experienced a rebirth among historians and the common public alike. Works by Ahmed S. AliÃÂiÃÂ, Mustafa ImamoviÃÂ, and Husnija Kamberoviàhave all cast Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàin a more positive light. Gradaà ¡ÃÂeviàis once again widely considered the greatest Bosniak national hero and is a symbol of national pride and spirit. The main streets in GradaÃÂac and Sarajevo are both named after him, as well as numerous other places in Bosnia and Herzegovina.