my-server
← Wiki

Whittaker model

In representation theory, a branch of mathematics, the Whittaker model is a realization of a representation of a reductive algebraic group such as GL<sub>2</sub> over a finite or local or global field on a space of functions on the group. It is named after E. T. Whittaker even though he never worked in this area, because pointed out that for the group SL<sub>2</sub>(R) some of the functions involved in the representation are Whittaker functions.

Irreducible representations without a Whittaker model are sometimes called "degenerate", and those with a Whittaker model are sometimes called "generic". The representation θ<sub>10</sub> of the symplectic group Sp<sub>4</sub> is the simplest example of a degenerate representation.

Whittaker models for GL<sub>2</sub>

If G is the algebraic group GL<sub>2</sub> and F is a local field, and is a fixed non-trivial character of the additive group of F and is an irreducible representation of a general linear group G(F), then the Whittaker model for is a representation on a space of functions ƒ on G(F) satisfying

used Whittaker models to assign L-functions to admissible representations of GL<sub>2</sub>.

Whittaker models for GL<sub>n</sub>

Let be the general linear group , a smooth complex valued non-trivial additive character of and the subgroup of consisting of unipotent upper triangular matrices. A non-degenerate character on is of the form

for ∈ and non-zero ∈ . If is a smooth representation of , a Whittaker functional is a continuous linear functional on such that for all ∈ , ∈ . Multiplicity one states that, for unitary irreducible, the space of Whittaker functionals has dimension at most equal to one.

Whittaker models for reductive groups

If G is a split reductive group and U is the unipotent radical of a Borel subgroup B, then a Whittaker model for a representation is an embedding of it into the induced (Gelfand–Graev) representation Ind(), where is a non-degenerate character of U, such as the sum of the characters corresponding to simple roots.

See also

References

  • J. A. Shalika, The multiplicity one theorem for , The Annals of Mathematics, 2nd. Ser., Vol. 100, No. 2 (1974), 171–193.

Further reading