The WTFPL is a permissive free software license. As a public domain like license, the WTFPL is essentially the same as dedication to the public domain. It allows redistribution and modification of the work under any terms. The name is an abbreviation of Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License.
The first version of the WTFPL, released in March 2000, was written by Banlu Kemiyatorn for his own software project. Sam Hocevar, Debian's former project leader, wrote version 2.
The WTFPL intends to be a permissive, public-domain-like license (not a copyleft). It differs from public domain in that an author can use it even if their country's laws provide no mechanism to renounce one's own copyright.
The WTFPL does not include a no-warranty disclaimer, unlike other permissive licenses, such as the MIT License. Though the WTFPL is untested in court, the official website offers a disclaimer to be used in software source code.
The text of Version 2, the most current version of the license, written by Sam Hocevar:
The WTFPL is not in wide use among open-source software projects; according to a 2016 review by Black Duck Software, the WTFPL was used by less than one percent of open-source projects. Examples include the OpenStreetMap Potlatch online editor, the video game Liero (version 1.36), yalu102 and some MediaWiki extensions. More than 12,000 Wikimedia Commons files and more than 34,000 Projects on GitHub were published under the terms of the WTFPL.
The license was confirmed as a GPL-compatible free software license by the Free Software Foundation, but its use is "not recommended". In 2009, the Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source license due to redundancy with the Fair License.
The WTFPL version 2 is an accepted Copyfree license. It is also accepted by Fedora as a free license and GPL-compatible.
Some software authors have said that the license is not very serious; forks have tried to address wording ambiguity and liability concerns. OSI founding president Eric S. Raymond interpreted the license as written satire against the restrictions of the GPL and other software licenses; WTFPL version 2 author Sam Hocevar later confirmed that the WTFPL is a parody of the GPL. Free-culture activist Nina Paley said she considered the WTFPL a free license for cultural works.
Google does not allow its employees to contribute to projects under public domain equivalent licenses like the WTFPL (including Unlicense and CC0), while allowing contributions to 0BSD licensed and US government PD projects.