The Vilayet of the Danube or Danubian Vilayet (; , Dunavska(ta) oblast, more commonly ÃÂÃÂýðòÃÂúø òøûðõÃÂ, Danube Vilayet) was a first-level administrative division (vilayet) of the Ottoman Empire from 1864 to 1878. In the late 19th century it reportedly had an area of .
The vilayet was created by merging the Eyalets of Nià ¡, Vidin and Silistra (in its post-1826 borders, after losing all kazas south of the Balkan Mountain that were spun off into the Edirne Vilayet). The Danube Vilayet was meant to become a model province, showcasing all the progress achieved by the Porte through the modernising Tanzimat reforms. Other vilayets modelled on the vilayet of the Danube were ultimately established throughout the empire by 1876, with the exception of the Arabian Peninsula and the by then semi-independent Egypt. Rusçuk, today Ruse in Bulgaria, was chosen as the capital of the vilayet due to its position as a key Ottoman port on the Danube.
The province disappeared after the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–78, when its north-eastern part (Northern Dobruja) was incorporated into Romania, some of its western territories into Serbia, while the central and southern regions made up most of the autonomous Principality of Bulgaria and a part of Eastern Rumelia.
Upon its establishment in 1864, the Danube Vilayet included the following sanjaks:
In 1868, the Sanjak of Nià ¡ was detached and made part of the Prizren Vilayet.
In 1876, the Sanjak of Nià ¡ and the Sanjak of Sofia were spun off into the short-lived Sofia Vilayet but were subsequently annexed to the Vilayets of Adrianople and Kosovo Vilayets only a year later, in 1877.
Midhat Pasha was the first governor of the vilayet (1864âÂÂ1868). During his time as a governor, steamship lines were established on the Danube River; the Ruse-Varna railroad was completed; agricultural credit cooperatives providing farmers with low-interest loans were introduced; tax incentives were also offered to encourage new industrial enterprises.
The first official vilayet newspaper in the Ottoman Empire, Tuna/Dunav, was published in both Ottoman Turkish and Bulgarian and had both Ottoman and Bulgarian editors. Its editors in chief included Ismail Kemal and Ahmed Midhat Efendi.
The vilayet had an Administrative Assembly that included state officials appointed by the Ottoman government as well as six representatives (three Muslims and three non-Muslims) elected from among the inhabitants of the province. Non-Muslims also participated in the provincial criminal and commercial courts that were based on a secular code of law and justice. Mixed Muslim-Christian schools were also introduced, but this reform was abolished after it was met by strong opposition by the populace.
Governors of the Vilayet:
According to the 1831 Ottoman census, the <em>male</em> population of the kazas to subsequently form the Danube Vilayet stood at 477,862 souls, including 306,534 Orthodox Christians or Rayah (64.15%), 159,308 Muslims (33.33%), 11,603 Romani (2.43%) and 417 Jews (0.09%). The census only covered healthy taxable men between 15 and 60 years of age, who were free from disability.
Reliable data about the population of the Nià ¡, Vidin and Silistra Eyalets, which were to form the Danube Vilayet in 1864, appeared only in the late 1850s, in the form of an Ottoman summary population register and a 1858 report by the British consul in Varna, Edward S. J. Neale (also based on the registers). According to Neale, the combined, <em>male and female</em> population of the three eyalets was 1,390,855, including 430,485 Muslims (30.95%), 910,735 Orthodox Bulgarians (65.48%), 10,100 Greeks (0.73%), 25,000 Vlachs (1.80%), 5,000 Jews (0.36%), and 9,535 "others" (0.68%). He noted that the Muslim population was in a steady demographic decline, while the Bulgarian one had increased considerably due to the Tanzimat reforms.
Nevertheless, compared with subsequent Ottoman statistics, Neale's figures appear to be an undercount, especially of Muslims, even though his opinion of population trends is shared by a number of Turkish historians, e.g., Kemal Karpat, who has cited an annual growth rate of 0% for Muslims and 2% for Non-Muslims for much of the 1800s.
According to the first modern Ottoman population register of 1859âÂÂ1860, the Nià ¡ Eyalet, Vidin Eyalet and Silistra Eyalet had a <em>male</em> population of 821,682, whereof 284,934 Muslims (34.68%), including 19,599 Muslim Romani (2.39%), and 536,748 Non-Muslims (65.32%), including 3,258 Non-Muslim Romani (0.4%). Total population, including women, was therefore 1,643,364, of whom 569,969 Muslims and 1,073,496 Non-Muslims. The register, however, did not cover the population of the Sanjaks of Mecidiye (Medgidia) and Sünne (Sulina) in Northern Dobruja, nor any Muhacir population. Compared with theâÂÂalbeit incomplete and poorly executed 1831 censusâÂÂthe figures indicate a whooping population growth of 71.95%, which is difficult to explain by natural growth alone.
At the same time, the proportions of the Muslim, Non-Muslim and Roma populations remained, by and large, similar. The number of Muslims grew by 66.55%, the number of Non-Muslims by 71.95%, while the Christian and Muslim Romani population practically doubled, posting an increase of 97.03%. However, despite steady growth rates, especially among Non-Muslims, the more likely reason for the drastic increase can be sought in the poor quality of the 1831 census, including missing data about a number of heavily populated kazas. In addition, as the census covered healthy taxable men over 15 only, it is unclear how much of the male population was actually counted, with, e.g., Arkadiev suggesting a multiplication factor of 2.02 to just calculate all males.
Muslim & Non-Muslim population in the territory of the future Danube Vilayet as per the Ottoman population register for 1859âÂÂ1860:
Non-Muslims held a clear majority in both the Nià ¡ Eyalet and Vidin Eyalet, at 81.18% and 75.59%, respectively, while the Silistra Eyalet was predominantly Muslim but by a slim margin of 55.17%,
The 1859-1860 figures are important as a benchmark as they are the last Ottoman records to not take into account the massive settlement of Crimean Tatars and Circassians across the Ottoman Empire after their forced expulsion by the Russians. Estimates of the number of Muhacir settled in the Danube Vilayet from 1855 to 1865 vary, from 200,000âÂÂ300,000 according to Kemal Karpat, 300,000 as stated by Turkish historian Nedim ðpek, 300,000 quoted by the 1867 Bulgarian edition of the Danube Official Gazette, 310,000 according to the French Consul-General in Rusçuk, Gabriel Aubaret, 350,000 according to Ottoman statesman and Danube Vilayet Governor, Midhat Pasha, and all the way to 350,000âÂÂ400,000, as estimated by Bulgarian Ottomanist Ventsislav Muchinov (however, for the entire Rumelia). The resettlement took place in two waves: one of 142,852 Tatars and Nogais, with a minority of Circassians, between 1855 and 1862, and a second one of some 35,000 Circassian families, settled in 1863-1864. Thus, nearly half of all 682,000 refugees were ended up in the Danube Vilayet.
Eventually, the Muhacir settlement led to an increase in the share of Muslims in the province to more than 42% by the mid 1870s. According to Kemal Karpat, the Tatar and Circassian colonisation of the vilayet not only offset the heavy Muslim population losses earlier in the century, but also counteracted continued population loss and led to an increase in its Muslim population. Koyuncu also attributes the lion's share of the Muslim population growth to the settlement of Crimean Tatars and Circassians.
<em>Male</em> population of the Danube Vilayet (exclusive of the Sanjak of Nià ¡) in 1865 according to Kuyûd-ñ Atîk (the Danube Vilayet printing press):
<em>Male</em> Muslim & Non-Muslim population in the Danube Vilayet according to the Ottoman Salname (Yearbook) for 1868:
After a vilayet-wide census completed in September 1874, the Danube Official Gazette published a flash summary of results on 18 October 1874, presenting cumulative data only, with no sanjak-by-sanjak breakdown. The results were also used for the 1875 Ottoman Salname, where they were also presented by sanjak, albeit with omissions.
Flash summary of the 1873-1874 Danube Vilayet census (males only), as published by the Danube Official Gazette:.
<em>Total</em> population of the Danube Vilayet by ethnoconfessional group according to French orientalist Ubicini on the basis of the official Ottoman Census of the Danube Vilayet of 1873-1874 (exclusive of the Sanjak of Nià ¡, then part of the Prizren Vilayet):
Thus, according to the 1874 census, there were 963,596 (42.22%) Muslims and 1,318,506 (57.78%) Non-Muslims in the Danube Vilayet, exclusive of the Sanjak of Nià ¡. Adding Nià ¡ resulted in a population breakdown of 1,055,650 (40.68%) Muslims and 1,539,278 (59.32%) Non-Muslims for the province. Muslims formed a majority in the Sanjaks of Rusçuk, Varna and Tulça, while the Sanjaks of Sofia, Vidin, Nià ¡ and Tarnovo had Non-Muslim majorities.
However, nearly a third of all Muslims and close to 15% of the total population of the province were all but recent settlers, and the spectacular increase in the Muslim population of, in particular, the Varna and Tulça Sanjaks was primarily fuelled by Crimean Tatar, Nogai and Circassian Muhacir arriving only in the late 1850s or mid-1860s. 71,146 Crimean Tatar and 6,994 Circassian Muhacir accounted for the majority of the Muslim (126,924 people) and a plurality of the total population of Northern Dobruja, a region spun off from the Tulça vilayet and smaller parts of the Rusçuk and Varna Vilayets and transferred to Romania in 1878.
<em>Male</em> Population of the Danube Vilayet (exclusive of the Sanjak of Nià ¡) in 1875 according to Tahrir-i Cedid (the Danube Vilayet printing press):
The brutality accompanying the suppression of the Bulgarian April Uprising of 1876 and the atrocities committed by irregular Ottoman paramilitaries (primarily Circassian bashi-bazouk) caused outrage across Europe, including the United Kingdom, the hitherto closest Ottoman ally. The disproportionate use of brute force against both insurgents and non-combatants caused the Great Powers to convene the Conference of Constantinople in December 1876 to seek a solution to the Bulgarian Problem.
In conjunction with the Conference, most Great Powers prepared their own estimates for the population of the Danube Vilayet. Authors include Gabriel Aubaret, French Consul-General in Rusçuk; Ottoman army officer Stanislas Saint Clair; French scholars and orientalists Ubicini and Courteille; W.N. Jocelyn, Secretary of the British Embassy in Constantinople; Greek official Stavrides, translator at the British Embassy in Constantinople; Russian diplomats Vladimir Cherkassky and Russian diplomat Vladimir Teplov.
<em>Total</em> population of the Danube Vilayet according to Russian diplomat Vladimir Cherkassky from the Ottoman population register:
<em>Male</em> population of the Danube Vilayet in 1876 according to the Ottoman officer Stanislas Saint Clair:
<em>Total</em> population of the Danube Vilayet (including Nià  and Sofia sanjaks) according to the 1876 edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica:
<em>Total</em> Population of the Danube Vilayet (excluding Nià  sanjak) in 1876 estimated by the French counsel Aubaret from the register: