The Dialect of the Tribe is a nine-page humorous short story by Harry Mathews (1930âÂÂ2017), an American francophone writer, close to Georges Perec, and who joined the Oulipo group in 1973.
It deals with pagolak, a fictional dialect of an equally fictional mountain tribe in central New Guinea, supposedly studied in the 1920s by the Australian linguist Ernest Botherby (Perth, 1869 â Adelaide, 1944). This language is said to have the peculiar feature of being intelligible to neighboring tribes without them understanding the meaning of the words used. Dictionaries thus prove inadequate for comprehending this phenomenon, as do attempts at explanation, to the point where the narrator, like Dr. Botherby, is left to carry out the process himself â in pagolak. The gradual encroachment of an allegedly scientific discourse by another, incomprehensible one in pagolak, creates a comic effect while questioning the translation process, both regarding the performative nature of the result and the untranslatability of the original.
The original publication in 1980 was preceded by the publication of the French translation of an earlier, longer version of the story, which included several details explicitly referring to the author's relationship with Perec, later removed from the final version. Sixteen years later, Mathews reuses the character of Dr. Botherby in Oulipo et traduction: Le cas du Maltais persévérant (Oulipo and Translation: The Case of the Persevering Maltese) for a report on another ethnolinguistic discovery: the Ohos, whose language is limited to the three words "Red equals bad," and the Ouhas, who also can say only one phrase, "Here not there." Botherby's attempt to explain the Ouhas' language to the Ohos leads him to realize that a language can only say what it is capable of saying. This variant refers to a chapter of ' by Perec, particularly the story of the Austrian anthropologist Appenzzell and his observations about the allegedly poor vocabulary of the Kubus of Sumatra.
The two versions of The Dialect of the Tribe and Oulipo and Translation: The Case of the Persevering Maltese form an intertextual network of fictions united by the common theme of translation issues and by the character of Botherby, alluding to Perec's underlying text about Appenzzell, to the relationship between Mathews and Perec, and their shared practices of writing and translation. This short story, which has drawn the attention of several translation specialists, has been linked to various theses from analytic philosophy concerning the stakes of translation. It also resonates with the pioneering work of anthropologist Bronisà Âaw Malinowski, stemming from his fieldwork in New Guinea. Finally, it illustrates the broader conception of translation within Oulipo, treating it as a particular case-constrained writing.
The Dialect of the Tribe was originally published in 1980 in the American journal SubStance and later that same year included, with a dedication to Georges Perec, in the collection Country Cooking and Other Stories. The French translation of this collection, published in 1991 under the title Cuisine de pays, includes a translation by Martin Winckler of the second version of the story, titled Le Dialecte de la tribu.
The original title, The Dialect of the Tribe, is taken from a passage in T. S. Eliot's poem Little Gidding: "Since our concern was speech, and speech impelled us / To purify the dialect of the tribe," where the phrase "to purify the dialect of the tribe" is itself the translation of a verse from Mallarmé's Le Tombeau d'Edgar Poe: "donner un sens plus pur aux mots de la tribu." The choice of this title, which also echoes Baudelaire's translation of Poe, signals to the reader the central importance of the theme of translation in the story.
The first publication in English was preceded, not without relation to the translation theory issues raised by the text, by the 1979 publication of a French translation by Marie Chaix, in a special issue of the journal L'Arc (magazine) devoted to Georges Perec. This was the first, longer version of the story, titled Abanika, traditore?, referring to the Italian phrase traduttore, traditore ("translator, traitor"). Martin Winckler, the translator of the second version published by ÃÂditions P.O.L in 1991, recounts that this was the first translation project entrusted to him by Paul Otchakovsky-Laurens, "as a trial," and adds that the text had previously been translated by Georges Perec himself. As Dennis Duncan points out, the translation published by L'Arc is by Marie Chaix, and concludes, in pagolak, the Papuan language central to the story, with the phrase "Nalaman: Chaixan Marianu," where the pagolak term nalaman designates the translation, or more precisely "the final result of the [translative] transformation."
The 1979 longer version multiplies explicit references to Perec. It is presented in the form of a letter addressed to "My dear Perec" ("Pereca Georgean" in Pagolak) and signed "Mathewsu Harryan." It mentions Mathews's translation of Perec's autobiographical text Les Gnocchis de l'automne, by homophonic reference to the Greek precept gnothi seauton ("know thyself"), and refers to the text on Roussel co-written by Perec and Mathews, with the comment: "Although the New Guinea text has nothing to do with him, our perverse Raymond would certainly have been intrigued by Pagolak." All these mentions evoking a personal dimension are removed in the second version, which, apart from the dedication (present only in the English version), limits itself to referencing the narrator's participation in a Festschrift (a collection of scholarly writings) in honor of the recipient â this detail serving to reinforce the ostensibly scientific character of the text.
The Dialect of the Tribe, just like its first version, Abanika, traditore?, revolves around the narrator's discoveryâÂÂthanks to Miss Maxine Moon, the librarian of Fitchwinder UniversityâÂÂof an article by Dr. Botherby about the language of an isolated New Guinea tribe, the Pagolak.
However, the story provides very little information about the supposed discoverer of Pagolak, limiting itself to mentioning "a certain Ernest Botherby (bless him!)" referred to as "doctor." The name Botherby is likely a nod to Bartlebooth, the character from ' (La Vie mode d'emploi), who himself refers back to Herman Melville's Bartleby and Valery Larbaud's Barnabooth, but also to Borges' Dr. Brodie, who, like Gulliver, encounters the Yahoos. Botherby's Australian nationality, in turn, through a marked homophony in English where Australia and Austria sound very close, evokes the character Marcel Appenzzell, an Austrian anthropologist in Life: A User's Manual, with whom he shares youthfulness, a taste for solitary explorations, and (implicitly in Mathews's work) a filiation with the works of Bronisà Âaw Malinowski.
Beyond the alliterative reference to Appenzzell's native Austria, the choice of Australian nationality for Botherby also helps create a pseudo-scientific realism effect, since ethnolinguistic studies in New Guinea were largely conducted by Australian scientists. Such studies developed after the establishment of the Australian mandate over New Guinea and especially after World War II, whereas the ones from the interwar period were mainly strictly ethnographic, carried out by anthropologists without linguistic training and therefore only produced "naive observations of little [scientific] value." The first rigorous work on the languages of the Sepik Basin â the region supposedly explored by Botherby â was undertaken by the Australian ethnolinguist Donald Laycock in the 1959âÂÂ1960 period. Moreover, in a 1961 article, Laycock emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between language and dialect in the linguistic context of the region. He considers that the term "dialect" should be reserved for variants of a language that do not prevent communication between speakers and that it should not be used for an oral language without a written tradition, nor for a local language differing from the official one.
Mathews adds a few details about Ernest Botherby in another text published in 1997 and translated into French in 2013, Oulipo and Translation: The Case of the Persevering Maltese. Ernest Botherby, born in Perth in 1869 and died in Adelaide in 1944, was "the scholar who founded the Australian school of ethnolinguistics," for whom "the tribes of New Guinea" were "a favorite subject," and who "rose to fame in the late 1920s after publishing several articles" on Pagolak. A specialist in New Guinea tribes and particularly interested in those who had fled all contact with their neighbors, he began anthropological research at the age of twenty-four, basing his work on that of NIcholas Mikloukho-Maclay, one of the first explorers of New Guinea, Samuel Macfarlane, who explored the Fly River, and Friedrich Hermann Otto Finsch, who explored the Sepik.
Botherby's first exploration, reported in The Case of the Persevering Maltese, takes place in the area of the central highlands of New Guinea, near the source of the Fly River. Mathews provides details inspired by travel accounts from the late 19th century, such as that of Samuel Macfarlane:
It is the most linguistically complex region of New Guinea (itself considered the most diverse region in the world in this respect, as nearly 1,000 languages are recorded there, often showing "enormous variation and many unusual features"), where even today, about a hundred Papuan languages, highly heterogeneous, are spoken. In a mountainous valley, Botherby discovers an archaic tribe of "a few hundred individuals, leading a peaceful existence under conditions of extreme simplicity." He names them the Ohos. Their language is reduced to three words and a single expression: "Red equals bad," although they make up for the poverty of their vocabulary by communicating through gestures, notably to indicate directions to Botherby or to express disagreement.
Continuing his exploration, Botherby discovers a second archaic tribe, which he names the Ouhas, whose language, just as rudimentary as that of the Ohos, only allows them to make "invariably the same statement": "Here not there."
A few weeks later, back in the Ohos valley and wishing to share his experience with them, he understands "what every translator learns sooner or later: a language says what it can say, and that's all." Thus, he has no choice but to translate "Here not there" as "Red equals bad." This extreme experience allows Mathews to "playfully contradict" Jakobson's assertion that "languages differ essentially in what they must convey and not in what they may convey."
Le Dialecte de la tribu (French translation), although published earlier, deals with events occurring after the discovery of the Ohos and the Ouhas. This time, it concerns another tribe of New Guinea, speaking a language called "pagolak." The short story takes the form of a letter in which the author reports his discovery of this language after reading a scientific article attributed to Dr. Botherby and titled Kalo gap pagolak, a title meaning "magical transformation of the pagolak." Botherby's article discusses the method used by the tribe speaking pagolak to translate expressions from their language into that of their neighborsâÂÂa method that produces translations that are "effective," "intelligible and acceptable," while hiding "the content," the "primary meaning" of the original statements. The kalo gap pagolak is more precisely the transcription of an oral statement by the abanika, the "chief of the word-chiefs" or "Chief of the Chief-Words" of the tribe, although the faculty of translation is not reserved for him: all members of the tribe who speak pagolak are capable of it.
Although pagolak is a "very primitive," "rudimentary" language, and although there are two dictionaries (one English, the other Dutch), these dictionaries, intended for traders, are arbitrary: they take into account only mercantile criteria and are of no use for understanding the translation method addressed in the kalo gap pagolak. Botherby himself, although providing "useful" and even "very valuable" notes, has "no other choice but to leave the abanikas statement intact" and provide no translation for itâÂÂa solution the narrator eventually applies to his letter.
The abanikas statement is not made up of "words about a [translation] process" whose "substantial content" would need to be explained, but rather of "the words of the process in action;" it is not "a description of the method, but the method itself." As a result, the narrator, following Dr. Botherby, claims he is capable of understanding the kalo gap without being able to reproduce it in another language. This "hermetic transformation" performed by the speaker of pagolak is apprehended through the terms namele and nalaman, which respectively designate the means of the transformation and its resultâÂÂthe transition from one to the other giving rise to a "subtle redistribution of phonemes," a "first demonstration" of the kalo gap, of the "transformative magic" at work. The awareness of the kalo gap is part of the rites of passage into adulthood, called nanmana, which is itself equated, through a "magical pun," with the transformation of the language (namele). The central ritual moment is sitokap utu sisi, meaning "reinstall words in (own) eggs," with the young people emerging from childhood "like seagulls hatching from hens' eggs."
As Mariacarmela Mancarella observes, the presence of Dr. Botherby in the two translated versions of The Dialect of the Tribe and then in The Case of the Persistent Maltese makes this character a sort of common thread, inviting consideration of transtextuality by revealing the "hypertextual" nature (the concept of hypertext is defined by Gérard Genette as the status of a text derived from another oneâÂÂthe hypotextâÂÂand which invites a "relational reading," a connection between the two texts) of Dialecte de la tribu, dAbanika, traditore?, and Oulipo et traduction: Le cas du Maltais persévérant, concerning a "hypotext," '.
Le Dialecte de la tribu is, in its original version, dedicated to Georges Perec. The dedication to Perec in the first edition of The Dialect of the Tribe and the numerous references to him in the draft version not only reflect the friendly bond between the two writers but also underline the importance of their collaboration, beyond the article on Roussel et Venise. Perec notably translated two of Mathews' novels, Les Verts Champs de moutarde de l'Afghanistan (The Green Fields of Afghanistan's Mustard) and Le Naufrage du stade Odradek (The Sinking of the Odradek Stadium); according to Duncan, a scene from Mathews' novel Conversions is reproduced in Chapter 27 of ', which Mathews, in turn, translated for an English-language anthology. Thus, the insertion of The Dialect of the Tribe in the context of an exchange with Perec discreetly testifies to a privileged relationship, prompting Dominique Jullien to remark that "the intertextual relations between Georges Perec and Harry Mathews [...] would certainly deserve a full study of their own." Moreover, in an interview with Burhan Tufail, Mathews acknowledges that he may have been too discreet and that this very discretion may have disappointed Perec: "Alas, he did not fully realize that it was a tribute to our relationship. I think he was disappointed that the connection to his work was not more explicit."
The character of Dr. Botherby thus refers to a chapter of Life: A User's Manual devoted to Appenzzell, an Austrian anthropologist "trained at the school of Malinowski," who, at the age of 23, left for Sumatra in search of a "phantom people that the Malays call the Anadalams, or the Orang-Kubus, or simply the Kubus." Appenzzell gradually realizes that the Kubus he wishes to observe flees from contact with him and that he is the cause of their flight. After six years, Appenzzell must give up his project and return to Europe, having, Perec notes, "practically lost the use of speech." This chapter of Perec's novel draws upon an earlier work of his: the writing in 1975 of a commentary for documentary ', a commissioned work for which Perec, according to his biographer David Bellos, had to read and write about the Kubus of Sumatra and the Papuans of New Guinea. The documentary presents the former as "specialists in avoiding" the white man. Perec commented in 1981: "This story deeply moved me because it exemplifies the anthropological approach: if you want to go observe the 'savages,' they, on the other hand, have no desire to be observed! So I decided to write a fiction about it."
The issue of translation is central to the texts featuring Dr. Botherby, beginning with The Dialect of the Tribe. From the very first paragraph, the narrator evokes "the question of translation in general," and in particular that of Perec's works. He asserts: "Translation is the model, the archetype of all writing." Furthermore, the second version includes an addition compared to the first, which Mariacarmela Mancarella considers "particularly significant:"
Mancarella sees in this a reference to the last sentence of Walter Benjamin's The Task of the Translator:
This fundamental issue is addressed from another angle in the first version of the story:
These statements suggest that the issue in the text is interlingual translation, the translation from one language to another. Emily Apter considers that the story points to one of the "truisms of translation," namely that something is always lost in translation and that, unless one "knows the language of the original, the exact nature of the loss will always be impossible to establish, and even if one has access to it, there is always an incompressible remainder of untranslatability that makes every translation an impossible world, a false regime of semantic and phonetic equivalence." Furthermore, as Alison James emphasizes, in the case of translating Ouha into Oho, it is interlingual translation from one language to another that is at stake, with Mathews seeming concerned with "the inevitable transformation of meaning in the passage from one language or culture to another." For his part, Dennis Duncan, drawing on Emily Apter's reading, considers that the fable of pagolak deals with the same subject as that of the Ohos and the OuhasâÂÂthe "incommensurability" of every language and the impossibility of translating it into any other language, "into English, French... or middle Bactrian."
Several authors believe that Dr. Botherby's experiences evoke or illustrate Quine's analyses on the indeterminacy of translation. Quine, in Word and Object, asks the question: "How can the linguist know that his translation is correct?" However, Mathews would substitute this question with: "What happens if the linguist knows that his translation will always be wrong?" Quine develops his analysis on this issue through what he calls the thought experiment of radical translation, illustrated by the example of the word gavagaï spoken by a native in the jungle at the emergence of a rabbit. The linguist, attempting to understand what this word means, ends up associating it with the observational statement "look, a rabbit," which can be confirmed by the assent of his interlocutor, yet the term does not lose its inscrutability. Quine observes, it is unclear whether "the objects to which the term applies are not, after all, something like rabbits, for example, simple phases, brief temporal segments of rabbits... or perhaps the objects to which 'gavagaï' applies are only the parts, the still undivided pieces of these rabbits." Quine notes that two independent dictionaries of this native language could present different and interchangeable content, each proposing a translation that the other would reject, while still describing the same behavior, which resembles the difficulties encountered in using the two dictionaries of pagolak. Furthermore, Dr. Botherby's disillusioned statement about the difficulty of translating the Ouhas' claim, "Here, not there," into the language of the Ohos, which can say "Red equals bad," seems to echo Quine's remark: "Who would attempt to translate 'neutrinos lack mass' into a jungle language?"
Mark Ford and Dennis Duncan, for their part, suggest that both the attempts at translating pagolak and the ouha in Mathews' works and Perec's notations about the Kubus resonate with Wittgenstein's reflections on language games. Perec reports an incidental remark by Appenzzell about the poverty of the Kubu vocabulary, exemplified by the polysemy of the term sinuya: "These characteristics could apply to a Western carpenter, who, using instruments with very precise names... would ask his apprentice: 'Pass me the thing.'" This allusion, which the context of the novel does not require, refers, for Ford and Duncan, to a passage from Philosophical Investigations where Wittgenstein proposes a model of the "entire language of a tribe," aiming to "dispel the fog by studying the language phenomena in the primitive forms of their usage that allow for a synoptic view of the purpose and function of words." This "complete primitive language" consists of four words used in exchanges between a mason and his apprentice: "block," "column," "slab," and "beam," with the carpenter's injunction in Perec echoing the mason's command in Wittgenstein: "Slab!" for "bring me the slab!" For Duncan, it is "immediately apparent" that the example of the Ohos and Ouhas is intended to perform a "dispelling of the fog," a modeling of the type Wittgenstein sought to carry out.
Marcel Appenzzell, the character in ' to whom Mathews' Dr. Botherby refers, is presented by Perec as a student of Bronisà Âaw Malinowski, with whom he maintains correspondence and through whom he is introduced to Marcel Mauss, "who entrusted him at the Institute of Ethnology with the responsibility for a seminar on the ways of life of the Anadalams." In contrast, the short stories by Mathews where Dr. Botherby appears do not explicitly refer to Malinowski, but the connection is suggested by several clues: the period of scientific activity (the 1920s), the field (New Guinea), and the translation issues that Mathews places at the center of the texts where Botherby appears. Moreover, both Quine's and Wittgenstein's analyses of language, which lead the former to employ the model of gavagaï and the latter to that of the mason, are inspired by or linked to Malinowski's analyses. Quine explicitly refers to these in Word and Object, and Ernest Gellner emphasizes the proximity of Wittgenstein's analyses in Philosophical Investigations to the earlier thesis by Malinowski, which Wittgenstein may have encountered through Charles Kay Ogden, his English translator.
Malinowski provides a general formulation of his analysis in Le problème de la signification dans les langues primitives (The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages), a text published in 1923 as an appendix to the book The Meaning of Meaning by Ogden and Ivor Armstrong Richards, in terms that resonate with Dr. Botherby's considerations on the uselessness of dictionaries for understanding pagolak. He asserts that the available vocabularies of Oceanic languages, which at his time were primarily written by missionaries with the intent of helping their successors, limit themselves to providing the best possible approximation of a local term, without aiming, as a scientific translation would, to determine whether a word corresponds to an idea in the reader's language or whether it corresponds to a completely foreign concept. This is the case with beliefs, customs, ceremonies, or magical rites, for which it would be necessary to provide an "imaginary equivalent" and clarify its meaning through an ethnographic explanation. Malinowski further asserts that in these languages, the use of metaphors, abstractions, and generalizations, combined with the concrete nature of expression, makes any simple and direct translation of words taken in isolation almost impossible, which leads him to develop the notion of "phatic communion," a situation where social ties are created through the exchange of words and, consequently, the role of language in social interaction, emphasizing the importance of the position of words and the context of their usage. These analyses are developed in Coral Gardens, where he claims that the words of one language are never translatable into another and that the difficulty of translation increases with cultural specificities: "sport for England, good food and love-making for France; sentimentality and metaphysical depths for Germany; music, pasta, and painting for Italy." He therefore concludes that "if we understand 'to translate' as finding verbal equivalents between two languages, this task is impossible, and the Italian proverb Traduttore, traditore is true." However, a translation is possible and correct if understood as cultural contextualization, and more specifically, as making the meaning of a word understood as the "effective change" it brings to a situation. As Bertrand Gervais points out, these aspects of phatic communication and performative value are precisely those that take precedence over the denotative function in both the Ohos and Ouhas, as well as in pagolak.
A section of <u>Coral Gardens</u> is dedicated to a problem similar to the one Botherby encounters with pagolak: the translation of magical formulas. Malinowski opts to render them in a "rhythmic and elaborate English version of the indigenous text," believing that "in the original version, the magical language, with its wealth of phonetic, rhythmic, metaphoric, and alliterative effects, with its strange cadences and repetitions, has a prosodic character that must be conveyed to the reader," without, however, taking too many liberties with it. He summarizes the difficulty as the translation of words that lack meaning, or more precisely, words whose function is not linked to their meaning but to a "magical influence that these words are supposed to exert." Emphasizing that, in line with his theory of "phatic communion," the meaning of any utterance is "the effective change it is supposed to bring about in the context of the situation in which it is uttered," Malinowski highlights two aspects that guided his approach: the "coefficient of strangeness," which he also calls the "element of nonsense," meaning that some words are intended not to be understood, and are therefore intrinsically untranslatable; and the "coefficient of intelligibility," meaning that some words belong to everyday language and are intended to be understood.
In Life: A User's Manual, the reference to Malinowski primarily serves to give a sense of reality to Appenzzell's desire for exoticism, embedding it within the context of the participatory observation method Malinowski develops in The Argonauts of the Western Pacific, even though Perec's ethnological reference may rather be the Lévi-Strauss of Tristes Tropiques. More generally, Perec shows a particular interest in applying an anthropological approach to daily life in his writing practice:
However, as Isabelle Dangy observes, this privileging of the endotic does not exclude, in a fictional context, the use of a "fictive, utopian, and semi-parodic ethnology" such as that developed in W or the Memory of Childhood, completed in 1975 just before Perec went to Montreal to collaborate on the commentary of '. Furthermore, as he claims in a 1976 interview, Perec believes that scientific knowledge plays a limited role in the development of his fictions, where it intervenes "not as truth, but as material, or machinery, of the imaginary." From an ethnolinguistic perspective, Appenzzell's considerations are particularly close to the situation described by Botherby with the Ohos and the Ouhas: the Kubus, notes Perec's ethnologist, use "an extremely reduced vocabulary, not exceeding a few dozen words," a fact that leads Appenzzell to wonder whether, "like their distant neighbors, the Papuans," the Kubus do not "deliberately impoverish their vocabulary, eliminating words each time there is a death in the village. One consequence of this fact is that a single word designates an increasingly larger number of objects." This observation is a reference to A Void, where Perec quotes on the last page, among other quotes termed "metagraphs," a 1937 geography manual by ÃÂtienne Baron:
Perec probably read this quote from Barthes, who presents it in 1966 in Critique and Truth while commenting:
This trope about Papuan language, often repeated elsewhere, contradicts a consistent note by Papuan language specialists. One of the first, Reverend Samuel Macfarlane, countered the then-popular opinion that the Papuans did not have a proper language, pointing out that, on the contrary, their languages are "in some respects superior to ours," including in terms of vocabulary, some of which had words "as precise in their meaning as if they had been defined by Johnson." With this stereotype, Appenzzell diverges from the recommendations of his mentor, Malinowski, who, based on his fieldwork with the Trobrianders, argued that "the multiplicity of uses of each word is not due to any negative phenomenon such as mental confusion, poverty of language, perverse or careless usage."
Malinowski believes that the same word, used in a variety of meanings, "fulfills a very specific function," that is, "to introduce a familiar element into an indefinite situation." To characterize this fact, Malinowski does not use the notion of polysemy or metaphor, but rather the concept of homonymy, asserting that it would be "erroneous to agglutinate all the meanings into a confused category" and condemning the "armchair anthropologist" who assumes a "pre-logical mentality" without "investigating the different meanings [of a word] or examining whether they are not true homonyms, that is, different words with the same sound." This position, however, has been criticized: Edmund Leach describes the "doctrine of homonyms" as a "desperate expedient," and Quine observes that Malinowski, wishing to "spare" the Trobrianders from an accusation of prelogical thinking, multiplies the translations of the same word according to the context to avoid any contradiction.
If this example is ambivalent, as it contains both an interlingual dimension (the translation of Kafka into French) and an intralingual dimension (the rewriting of it), the intralingual conception of translation, within the same language, emerges in the article Translation from the Oulipo Compendium, where Harry Mathews states that translation is "a central principle of Oulipian research, but not in the usual sense of the term; Oulipian translation techniques are used within the same language, and each technique manipulates an element of the text that has been artificially isolated from the whole, whether it concerns meaning, sound, grammar, or vocabulary."
Mathews summarizes his point of view for journalist Lynne Tillman: "Perhaps writing is nothing but a translation â in the end, a translation that doesn't want to be identified as such," an assertion that carries two aspects: on the one hand, the position of writing as transformation, as manipulation through constraints, an analysis shared within the Oulipo; and on the other hand, Mathews' personal choice not to reveal the constraints he uses, thus giving the impression of "following rules from elsewhere," much like Raymond Queneau and in contrast to Perec (who, however, does not reveal all of them).
In this sense, according to Bertrand Gervais, Le Dialecte de la tribu "seems to speak, with its practice of the kalo gap pagolak, about interlingual translation, when it only speaks of intralingual translation, which is at the heart of Oulipian practice." In this sense, the narrator's statement can be interpreted in the story: "One could say that, insofar as true writing is a form of translation, the text from which it operates is infinitely difficult since it is nothing less than the universe itself." For Gervais, Mathews' story is a trompe-l'Ã Âil:
To highlight this dimension of intralingual translation at work in the pagolak, Thomas Beebee emphasizes one aspect: the use of the palindrome. He observes that the very name of the magical method, kalo gap, is a palindrome of pagolak; that the two components of the method, namalam (the end) and namele (the means), are quasi-palindromes; that nanmana (the initiatory rite) is an analogical transformation of namalan; that as the text progresses toward its conclusion, the palindromes become more "monstrous," such as nasavuloniputitupinoluvasan, a large palindrome that contains a small one, tit, in its center; that the final exhortation, which the narrator no longer bothers to translate, is also palindromic; that it again has tit at its center and uses, in at least one sense, all the words of pagolak previously employed:
According to Bertrand Gervais, the Oulipian dimension of the intralingual game takes precedence, in Le Dialecte de la tribu, over the apparent discourse regarding interlingual translation: it is not only a tribute to one of the most prominent members of Oulipo, Georges Perec, but also a "self-reflexive" text about Oulipo as a "literary and interpretative community," as a tribe, and about its dialect. Moreover, as Camille Bloomfield and Hermes Salceda observe, both dimensions of translation, interlingual and intralingual, combine in Oulipian text translation, aiming to "produce in the target language an effect comparable to that produced by the source text in the source culture." This is, for example, the ambition of Umberto Eco's Italian translation of Raymond Queneau's Exercises in Style, about which the translator states: "One must, rather than translate, recreate in another language."