The Fall of the Earl of Essex is a 1731 tragedy by James Ralph. An adaptation of Restoration play The Unhappy Favourite (1681) by John Banks, it premiered at Goodman's Fields Theatre on 1 February 1731 and ran for four consecutive performances. The text was issued anonymously later that year. Ralph retained BanksâÂÂs plot but rewrote much of the dialogue, removed or softened several sensational episodes (including the âÂÂbox on the earâÂÂ), altered stage business (the Queen addresses Essex on his first entrance; the scaffold is shown and EssexâÂÂs body is brought on), and regularised the verse with longer, reflective speeches and act-closing similes. Staged at a âÂÂlittleâ theatre, the play has been read within the opposition-minded climate of the early 1730s; while direct identification with Sir Robert Walpole has been judged speculative, some scholars view the piece as obliquely anti-Walpole. Critical opinion has been cool: nineteenth-century commentator John Genest called the alteration dull (though better than BanksâÂÂs original), and later critics have likewise judged it unsuccessful. When Goodman's Fields returned to the Essex story in 1734 and 1745, bills styled the mainpiece as BanksâÂÂs original (The Unhappy Favourite / The Earl of Essex) rather than RalphâÂÂs adaptation.
The play opened at Goodman's Fields Theatre in Whitechapel on 1 February 1731; bills styled it âÂÂA New Tragedyâ and credited Ralph. BanksâÂÂs The Unhappy Favourite (1681) had already fixed the EssexâÂÂElizabeth story for later dramatists, and standard histories discuss RalphâÂÂs reliance on that model. The venueâÂÂone of LondonâÂÂs âÂÂlittleâ theatres rather than a patent theatreâÂÂshowed a mixed but sometimes oppositional repertoire in the early 1730s.
At the court of Elizabeth I the council, led by Burleigh, presses charges against the Earl of Essex for exceeding orders in Ireland by negotiating a truce. The Queen, torn between favour and duty, confronts Essex on his return but commits him to custody.
EssexâÂÂs allies, notably the Earl of Southampton, lament his fall. The case proceeds, and the QueenâÂÂs indecision persists. In a private interview she gives Essex a token, promising that if it is returned to her in extremity she will grant whatever he asks, and he is sent to the Tower. Sir Walter Raleigh and Burleigh further harden opinion against him, while Lady Essex petitions for mercy.
In the prison, Lady Nottingham offers to intercede. Essex refuses to sue for his own life but entrusts her with the QueenâÂÂs token and asks above all for clemency toward Southampton and Lady Essex. Nottingham, spurned, withholds the token and tells the Queen that no such appeal was made. Stung by this report, the Queen orders immediate execution.
On the scaffold hung with black, Southampton is reprieved, while Essex exhorts him to live and protect his family. Essex goes to his death offstage; the consequences of NottinghamâÂÂs deception and the QueenâÂÂs grief close the action.
It was performed at Goodman's Fields on 1, 2, 3, and 4 February 1731. The third night (3 February) was advertised as a benefit for the author.
Nicoll lists further performances on 16 April 1734 and on 2 January, 29 January, and 13 December 1745; however, the London Stage Database records those Goodman's Fields dates under BanksâÂÂs The Unhappy Favourite (styled The Earl of Essex) rather than RalphâÂÂs adaptation.
The play was printed in octavo in 1731, issued anonymously, under the title The Fall of the Earl of Essex⦠AlterâÂÂd from the Unhappy Favourite of Mr. Banks. Ralph did not attach his name to the edition; the preface adopts a self-deprecating tone, hoping that BanksâÂÂs âÂÂGeniusâ might elevate his own âÂÂTinsel.âÂÂ
The adaptation retains BanksâÂÂs plot but pares back episodes judged melodramatic. It drops the well-known âÂÂbox on the earâ scene between Elizabeth and Essex, has the Queen address Essex on his first entrance, shows the scaffold in Act V, and brings on EssexâÂÂs body in a coffin; much of the dialogue was newly written.
In technique and style, asides are replaced with direct exchanges; brisk repartee yields to longer, measured speeches. The verse is regularised and more reflective, with set pieces on ambition, court life, and withdrawal from the world (e.g., EssexâÂÂs wish to âÂÂleave all Courts ⦠[and] herd with milder MonstersâÂÂ). Acts often close with an extended simile in rhymed couplets; Act II ends with a seafaring conceit.
The printed paratexts state the adapterâÂÂs aims: the prologue praises Banks for having âÂÂsketchâÂÂd the bold Design ⦠[and] markâÂÂd the Passions strong,â yet says the colours were âÂÂrudely laid,â and adds that the adapter âÂÂlays his own imperfect Schemes asideâ and âÂÂinvokes the Genius of the Bards of Old.â The title page quotes Richard SteeleâÂÂs 1709 estimate of Banks.
Although the text does not name contemporary figures, modern scholarship reads it within the opposition-leaning theatrical climate of the early 1730s. Goodman's Fields showed no fixed partisan line, yet it staged opposition pieces in this period.
On The Fall of the Earl of Essex specifically, Loftis argues that identifying its courtiers with Walpole âÂÂrequires imagination,â but notes clear analogies (Essex as a queenâÂÂs favourite; Walpole and Queen Caroline) and lines that in 1731 would have sounded like an arraignment of WalpoleâÂÂs peace policyâÂÂfor example BurleighâÂÂs charge that Essex âÂÂbetrayâÂÂd his Charge ⦠commensâÂÂd a Truce against [the QueenâÂÂs] absolute Command.âÂÂ
In this context, Elizabeth R. McKinsey characterizes RalphâÂÂs adaptation as âÂÂopaquely anti-Walpole.âÂÂ
In 1832, John Genest described the alteration as âÂÂvery dull,â though âÂÂon the whole ⦠better than the original piece.â In 1962, J. M. Bastian judged the adaptation âÂÂnot successful.âÂÂ
RalphâÂÂs adaptation was performed on four consecutive nights at Goodman's Fields (1âÂÂ4 February 1731). When the Essex story returned to the theatre in 1734, listings styled the mainpiece as The Unhappy Favourite; in 1745 they styled it as The Earl of Essex, rather than RalphâÂÂs adaptation.