TarskiâÂÂGrothendieck set theory (TG, named after mathematicians Alfred Tarski and Alexander Grothendieck) is an axiomatic set theory. It is a non-conservative extension of ZermeloâÂÂFraenkel set theory (ZFC) and is distinguished from other axiomatic set theories by the inclusion of Tarski's axiom, which states that for each set there is a "Tarski universe" it belongs to (see below). Tarski's axiom implies the existence of inaccessible cardinals, providing a richer ontology than ZFC. For example, adding this axiom supports category theory.
The Mizar system and Metamath use TarskiâÂÂGrothendieck set theory for formal verification of proofs.
TarskiâÂÂGrothendieck set theory starts with conventional ZermeloâÂÂFraenkel set theory and then adds âÂÂTarski's axiomâÂÂ. We will use the axioms, definitions, and notation of Mizar to describe it. Mizar's basic objects and processes are fully formal; they are described informally below. First, let us assume that:
TG includes the following axioms, which are conventional because they are also part of ZFC:
It is Tarski's axiom that distinguishes TG from other axiomatic set theories. Tarski's axiom also implies the axioms of infinity, choice, and power set. It also implies the existence of inaccessible cardinals, thanks to which the ontology of TG is much richer than that of conventional set theories such as ZFC.
More formally:
where denotes the cardinality of a set. In short, Tarski's axiom states that every set belongs to a Tarski universe. If a Tarski universe is transitive, it is also a Grothendieck universe. Conversely, assuming the axiom of choice, every Grothendieck universe is a Tarski universe (i.e. satisfies Tarski's axiom).
The set looks much like a âÂÂuniversal setâ for âÂÂit not only has as members the powerset of , and all subsets of , it also has the powerset of that powerset and so onâÂÂits members are closed under the operations of taking powerset or taking a subset. It's like a âÂÂuniversal setâ except that of course it is not a member of itself and is not a set of all sets. That's the guaranteed universe belongs to. And then any such is itself a member of an even larger âÂÂalmost universal setâ and so on. Tarski's axiom is an axiom that guarantees vastly more sets than ZFC does.
The Mizar language, underlying the Mizar system's implementation of TG and providing its logical syntax, is typed and the types are assumed to be non-empty. Hence, the theory is implicitly taken to be non-empty. The existence axioms, e.g. the existence of the unordered pair, is also implemented indirectly by the definition of term constructors.
The system includes equality, the membership predicate and the following standard definitions:
The Metamath system supports arbitrary higher-order logics, but it is typically used with the "set.mm" definitions of axioms. The ax-groth axiom adds Tarski's axiom, which in Metamath is defined as follows: