Sirenik, Sirenik Yupik, Sireniki Yupik (also Old Sirenik or Vuteen), or Sirenikskiy is an extinct Eskaleut language. It was spoken in and around the village of Sireniki () in Chukotka Peninsula, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Russia. The language shift has been a long process, ending in total language death. In January 1997, the last native speaker of the language, a woman named Vyjye (Valentina Wye) (), died. Ever since that point, the language has been extinct; nowadays, all Sireniks speak Siberian Yupik or Russian. Despite this, censuses as late as 2010 report up to 5 native speakers of Sirenik.
is the endonym for the eponymous settlement of Sireniki. The endonym for the people itself is (; ); the singular form is .
This article is based on Menovschikov (1964), with cited examples transliterated from Cyrillic transcription to the International Phonetic Alphabet.
Sirenik is an Eskimoan language, one of the two major groupings of the Eskaleut languages. The exact genealogical classification of Sirenik within its group is uncertain. Some argue that Sirenik is a remnant of a third group of Eskimoan languages, in addition to Yupik and Inuit groups (see a visual representation by tree and an argumentation based on comparative linguistics); others regard it as belonging to the Yupik branch, or as forming a YupikâÂÂSirenik branch with Yupik.
Many words are formed from entirely different roots to those in Siberian Yupik. In addition, the grammar has several peculiarities compared to the other Eskimoan languages as well as Aleut. For example, although most Eskaleut languages, including Sirenik's neighboring relative Siberian Yupik, have dual number, it is not known in Sirenik. The peculiarities amounted to mutual unintelligibility with even its nearest language relatives. This forced Sirenik people to use Chukchi as a lingua franca when speaking with neighboring Eskimo peoples. Thus, any external contacts for Sirenik people required using a different language: they either resorted to the use of a lingua franca, or used the Siberian Yupik language (definitely a mutually unintelligible, different language for them, not just a dialect of their own). This difference from all their language relatives may be the result of a supposed long isolation from other Eskimo groups: Sirenik people may have been in contact only with speakers of unrelated languages for many centuries in the past, and their language may have been influenced, especially by non-relative Chukchi.
Although the number of its speakers was very few even at the end of the nineteenth century, the language had at least two dialects in the past.
As for its morphological typology, it has polysynthetic and incorporative features, just like the other Eskimoan languages.
Like all other Eskimo languages, the morphology is rather complex. A description grouped by lexical categories follows.
Although morphology will be treated grouped into a nominal and a verbal part, many Eskimo languages show features which âÂÂcrosscutâ any such groupings in several aspects:
Some grammatical categories (e.g. person and number) are applicable to both verbal and nominal lexical categories.
Although person and number are expressed in a single suffix, sometimes it can be traced back to consist of a distinct person and a distinct number suffix.
Paradigms can make a distinction in 3rd person for âÂÂselfâÂÂ, thus the mere personal suffix (of the verb or noun) can distinguish e.g.
Thus, it can be translated into English (and some other languages) using a reflexive pronoun. This notion concerns also other concepts in building larger parts of the sentence and the text, see section #Usage of third person suffixes.
Although other Eskimo languages know more than the familiar two grammatical numbers, by having also dual, Sireniki uses only singular and plural. Sireniki is, as mentioned above, peculiar in this aspect, alongside Greenlandic, within the EskimoâÂÂAleut language family, with even its neighboring Siberian Yupik relatives having dual number.
Sireniki had an unusual wide range of deictic distinctions between up to four distances (near, medial, far and out_of_view) which could be horizontal âÂÂunaâÂÂ>âÂÂignaâÂÂ>âÂÂiknaâÂÂ, vertical âÂÂmanaâÂÂ>âÂÂunygnaâÂÂ>âÂÂpiknaâÂÂ, marking a movement like approaching the speaker âÂÂuknaâÂÂ, away from them âÂÂagnaâÂÂ, refer to conversational topics be they definite âÂÂugnaâÂÂ>âÂÂkâÂÂamnaâÂÂ>oov âÂÂamnaâ or indefinite âÂÂkâÂÂakymnaâÂÂ>âÂÂkâÂÂagnaâÂÂ>oov âÂÂakymnaâ or describe sth in the past âÂÂimnaâÂÂ.
Suffix -- meaning âÂÂto be similar to sthâÂÂ:
Predicative form of a noun can be built using suffix --:
Not only the grammatical cases of nouns are marked by suffixes, but also the person of possessor (use of possessive pronouns in English) can be expressed by agglutination.
It is just an excerpt for illustration: not all cases are shown, Sirenik language has more grammatical cases. The table illustrates also why Sirenik language is treated as agglutinative (rather than fusional).
There is no grammatical gender (or gender-like noun class system).
Sireniki is an absolutiveâÂÂergative language.
Cases (listed using Menovà ¡ÃÂikov's numbering):
To see why a single case can play such distinct roles at all, read morphosyntactic alignment, and also a short table about it.
Some finer grammatical functions are expressed using postpositions. Most of them are built as a combinations of cases
in a similar way as we use expressions like "on top of" in English.
Also at verbs, the morphology is very rich. Suffixes can express grammatical moods of the verb (e.g. imperative, interrogative, optative), and also negation, tense, aspect, the person of subject and object. Some examples (far from being comprehensive):
The rich set of morphemes makes it possible to build huge verbs whose meaning could be expressed (in most of widely known languages) as whole sentences (consisting of more words) . Sireniki â like the other Eskimo languages â has polysynthetic and incorporative features, in many forms, among others polypersonal agreement.
The polysynthetic and incorporative features mentioned above manifest themselves in most of the ways Sirenik language can express grammatical categories.
For background, see transitivity. (Remember also section #ErgativeâÂÂabsolutive.)
See also Nicole Tersis and Shirley Carter-Thomas (2005).
Even the grammatical polarity can be expressed by adding a suffix to the verb.
An example for negative polarity: the negation form of the verb (to go):
Also linguistic modality can be expressed by suffixes. Modal verbs like "want to", "wish to" etc. do not even exist:
The table illustrates also why Sirenik is treated as agglutinative (rather than fusional).
Four grammatical voices are mentioned in:
all of them are expressed by agglutination, thus, no separate words are required.
A distinction between two kinds of participles (adverbial participle and adjectival participle) makes sense in Sireniki (just like in Hungarian, see and for detailed description of these concepts; or in Russian, see and ).
Sireniki has many kinds of participles in both categories. In the following, they will be listed, grouped by the relation between the âÂÂdependent actionâ and âÂÂmain actionâ (or by other meanings beyond this, e.g. modality) â following the terminology of Menovschikov (1964). A sentence with a participle can be imagined as simulating a subordinating compound sentence where the action described in the dependent clause relates somehow to the action described in the main clause. In English, an adverbial clause may express reason, purpose, condition, succession etc., and a relative clause can express many meanings, too.
In an analogous way, in Sireniki Eskimo language, the "dependent action" (expressed by the adverbial participle in the sentence element called adverbial, or expressed by the adjectival participle in the sentence element called attribute) relates somehow to the âÂÂmain actionâ (expressed by the verb in the sentence element called predicate), and the participles will be listed below grouped by this relation (or by other meanings beyond this, e.g. modality).
They can be translated into English e.g. by using an appropriate adverbial clause. There are many of them, with various meanings.
An interesting feature: they can have person and number. The person of the dependent action need not coincide with that of the main action. An example (meant in the British English usage of âÂÂshall / shouldâ in the 1st person: here, conveying only conditional, but no necessity or morality):
Another example (with a different adverbial participle):
They will be discussed in more details below.
An adverbial participle âÂÂexplaining reason, purpose or circumstance of actionâ is expressed by suffix -- / -- (followed by appropriate person-number suffix). Examples:
Another example, with a somewhat different usage:
Using the adverbial participle -- / --, the dependent action (expressed by the adverbial participle in the sentence element called adverbial) finishes just before the main action (expressed by the verb in the sentence element called predicate) begins.
It can be expressed by suffix --. Examples:
where
Another example:
Dependent action is conditional: it does not takes place, although it would (either really, or provided that someâÂÂmaybe irrealâÂÂconditions would hold). Confer also conditional sentence.
Sireniki Eskimo has several adverbial participles to express that. We can distinguish them according to the concerned condition (conveyed by the dependent action): it may be
It is expressed with suffix -- / --, let us see e.g. a paradigm beginning with (if I get off / depart); (if you get off / depart):
Confer counterfactual conditional. Sireniki can compress it into an adverbial participle: it is expressed with suffix -- / --.
The dependent action is expressed with an adverbial participle. The main action is conveyed by the verb. If also the main action is conditional (a typical usage), than it can be expressed with a verb of conditional mood. The persons need not coincide.
An example (meant in the British English usage of âÂÂshall / shouldâ in the 1st person: here, conveying only conditional, but no necessity or morality):
The example in details:
Dependent action:
There are more kinds of them.
They can be used not only in attributive role (as in the above examples), but also in predicative role:
Adjectival participle - / - conveys a meaning related rather to modality (than to the relation of dependent action and main action). It conveys meaning âÂÂable toâÂÂ.
Sireniki is (just like many Eskimo languages) an ergativeâÂÂabsolutive language. For English-language materials treating this feature of Sireniki, see Nikolai Vakhtin (2000).