Quo Vadis, Aida? () is a 2020 internationally co-produced war drama film written, produced and directed by Jasmila à ½baniÃÂ, and based on Hasan NuhanoviÃÂ's book Under the UN Flag. An international co-production of twelve production companies, the film was shown in the main competition section of the 77th Venice International Film Festival.
The film dramatizes the July 1995 Srebrenica massacre of over 8,300 Bosniak men and boys by the Bosnian Serb Army under the command of General Ratko MladiÃÂ (Boris IsakoviÃÂ) which was part of the wider Bosnian genocide in the Bosnian War. The plot focuses on Aida SelmanagiÃÂ (Jasna ÃÂuriÃÂiÃÂ), a translator for the United Nations, who tries to juggle her professional obligations with attempts to save her husband (Izudin BajroviÃÂ) and two sons (Boris Ler and Dino BajroviÃÂ) from certain death.
Quo Vadis, Aida? earned a nomination for Best International Feature Film at the 93rd Academy Awards, and received two BAFTA Award nominations. It also won four European Film Awards, including Best Film.
A direct sequel titled Quo Vadis, Aida? - The Missing Part, and starring Jasna ÃÂuriÃÂiÃÂ, is expected to be released in 2026.
The film opens with former secondary school teacher Aida SelmanagiÃÂ translating the negotiations between the Dutchbat commander Thom Karremans and the Mayor of Srebrenica. The nervous Mayor questions Karremans about Dutchbat's plans in case NATO's airplanes do not come to aid them against the advancing Army of Republika Srpska (VRS); Karremans convinces him that the planes would come. In Aida's apartment, her husband Nihad and sons Hamdija and Sejo watch the news report on the VRS finally capturing the besieged Srebrenica, despite the town being designated a United Nations Safe Area. The SelmanagiÃÂs flee their apartment and go to the United Nations base in PotoÃÂari. A column of thousands of civilians march towards the base. The base, however, cannot take them all in. Aida is torn between her translating job at the base and the attempts to find her family, whom she lost in the crowd. She finds Sejo inside the base, and he tells her that Nihad and Hamdija are stuck outside.
VRS general Ratko MladiÃÂ takes a celebratory walk through the streets of destroyed Srebrenica, while showing off for the cameras and claiming the town has been liberated. The Dutch require three representatives of civilians in the base who will accompany them to the negotiations with MladiÃÂ. Aida manages to convince Major Rob Franken to take Nihad, since there weren't enough volunteers within the base. Under cover of night, with Franken's consent, Aida smuggles Nihad and Hamdija into the base. Nihad, alongside Muharem and ÃÂamila, accompanies Dutchbat at the negotiations. MladiÃÂ promises to let civilians leave the Srebrenica enclave for the ARBiH-controlled Kladanj with buses that he himself will provide. Nihad and the Dutch believe him, while ÃÂamila is aware MladiÃÂ plans to execute them all.
While Karremans is still with MladiÃÂ, VRS troops arrive to the UN base and demand to be let inside. Karremans orders Franken to let them in via a handheld transceiver. VRS commander Joka mocks the Bosniak men inside the base, and humiliates the civilians. The buses arrive and the VRS orders to separate the men from the women and children. Aida, now aware of her family's fate, begs the Dutch to protect them but they refuse to defy orders. Tarik, a fellow UN translator, adds Aida's family to the list of the base personnel in an attempt to protect them; the Dutch, however, cross them out.
While Aida struggles to hide her family in one of the machines in the baseâÂÂwhich is an abandoned battery factoryâÂÂoutside, Mladiàfilms himself promising safety to a bus full of Bosniak women. The Dutch help the VRS separate the men from the women and children. Some of them are even distressed by the cries of separated families, but do not react. Aida's family is found and taken away. At the last minute, Franken offers Nihad protection for his participation in the UN negotiations. Aida and Nihad try to get Franken to protect one of their sons instead, but Franken remains adamant. Nihad then boards one of the trucks together with his sons, along with other men, as devasted Aida cries and screams after them. The truck arrives at Dom Kulture in Pilica and the men are grouped inside. Machine guns emerge from outside the building through its windows, opening fire on the men inside. The residents of Pilica drink their coffee around the building, while the sounds of gunfire pierce the air.
Time has passed. Aida returns to her family apartment in Srebrenica, which she fled from in the film's opening minutes. She meets with Vesna, a young Serb woman, and her little son, who now live there. Vesna returns her family photos; Aida tells her to move out as soon as possible. When Vesna expresses concern for Aida's safety, Aida replies that she has nothing left to lose. On the staircase, she passes and says hi to Joka, who doesn't recognize her; a second later she realizes that he is Vesna's husband and that he lives in her apartment. Aida goes to identify remains dug up from mass graves; in the mass of remains, she recognizes Nihad's and Sejo's by their clothing. She burst into tears. Some time later, Aida is shown working as an elementary school teacher. As she supervises the children's school play, the camera shows the perpetrators and victims of the massacre in the audience, including Joka and Vesna.
Jasmila à ½baniàand her husband Damir Ibrahimoviàfound the basis for the film in Under the UN Flag, a book by the Srebrenica survivor Hasan Nuhanoviàwho worked as a translator at the UN base in PotoÃÂari. They obtained the rights and started working on the screenplay with NuhanoviÃÂ. Nuhanoviàleft the project due to creative differences between him and à ½baniÃÂ, who thought that changing the protagonist to a woman would allow the audience to connect with them better. Nuhanoviàalso found the process of writing the screenplay too painful.
Thom Karremans refused to meet à ½baniÃÂ, so she consulted with David Harland, former UN chief of civil affairs for Bosnia and Herzegovina, who investigated UN reports on what happened in Srebrenica. In the meantime, Ibrahimoviàfound that it was impossible to fund the film solely from Bosnia and Herzegovina, so companies from Austria, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania and Turkey joined the production. However, the complexity of the production made the funding difficult. à ½baniàand Ibrahimoviàthen assembled all the producers at the 69th Berlin International Film Festival and held a meeting. Ibrahimoviàconvinced them to start pre-production, claiming that the project would "die" otherwise. Despite running out of money halfway through production, Ibrahimoviàsecured funds with a â¬500,000 loan from a bank.
In order to create a world for the film for viewers to enter, à ½baniàanalyzed authentic war videos on YouTube, as well as videos she received surreptitiously. She had access to seven hours of video footage of how Dutch soldiers lived and what life was like at the base. This helped her with the set design details and the spirit of the UN base. To Jutarnji list, à ½baniàstated that, "for the Dutch, Bosnian Muslims were not human beings equal to them." However, she praised the Dutch actors, producers and foundation for their eagerness to participate in the film: "In any case, Srebrenica is a great trauma for the Netherlands. [...] That is the difference between us and real democratic societies. Their citizens know that this act was shameful and it does not occur to them to relativize or deny the event."
Serbian actress Jasna ÃÂuriÃÂiàwas the first choice for the role of the protagonist. ÃÂuriÃÂiàand à ½baniàhad previously worked together on For Those Who Can Tell No Tales (2013). When it came to the role of Ratko MladiÃÂ, à ½baniàat one point considered not showing him at all, but filming him from behind. However, the idea was abandoned because the director did not want to mystify him or "give him some kind of aura that did not belong to him". ÃÂuriÃÂiÃÂ's husband Boris Isakoviàwas hesitant to accept the role of Ratko Mladiàdue to the MladiÃÂ's perceived heroism among Bosnian Serbs, and was subjected to pressure in Serbia after accepting it.
Many of the film's extras survived horrors of war themselves. One day, filming was even interrupted after two women, who were Srebrenica survivors themselves, got upset at the sight of IsakoviÃÂ in the role of MladiÃÂ.
à ½baniàconnected with the Mothers of Srebrenica and held theatre workshops for local children with the aim of encouraging coexistence; however, she and Ibrahimoviàbelieved that filming in the town of Srebrenica would be impossible, as it is situated in Republika Srpska and predominantly populated by Serbs. Mladen GrujiÃÂiÃÂ, the mayor of Srebrenica at the time, even denied the genocide and had never visited the Srebrenica Genocide Memorial.
Filming began in July 2019 in the Herzegovinian towns of Mostar and Stolac. The production struggled to secure military equipment for the filming, as Bosnian Serb officials denied their requests. An unnamed friend of IbrahimoviÃÂ pulled some strings with an unnamed minister and got two tanks for the filming. The filming was finished in September 2019.
The film had its world premiere at the 77th Venice International Film Festival on 3 September 2020. It was also screened at the 2020 Toronto International Film Festival on 13 September 2020. On 10 October 2020, the film had its Bosnian-Herzegovinian premiere at the Srebrenica Genocide Memorial. In February 2021, Super LTD acquired U.S. distribution rights to the film. It was released in the United States through virtual cinema on 5 March 2021, followed by video on demand on 15 March 2021.
The NuhanoviàfamilyâÂÂNasiha and Ibro, and their sons Hasan and MuhamedâÂÂserved as the basis for the film's Selmanagiàfamily. The role of the UN translator was, however, shifted from the son Hasan Nuhanoviàto the matriarch Aida SelmanagiÃÂ. Hasan, just like Aida, unsuccessfully attempted to get the Dutch to protect his family. Ibro Nuhanoviàdid go to negotiate with Ratko MladiÃÂ, just like Nihad SelmanagiÃÂ. The characters of ÃÂamila and Muharem were based on the real-life people ÃÂamila Omanoviàand Nesib Mandà ¾iÃÂ. Unlike the character of ÃÂamila, who was groped by a Serb soldier while searched for weapons before entering the building to negotiate, the real-life ÃÂamila Omanoviàwas allowed to enter the building without being searched at all.
The negotiations scene was a recreation of the documentary footage: ÃÂamila did reveal that she had two children and a grandchild, to which Mladiàexpressed surprise that she is already a grandmother at her age, and she did identify one of MladiÃÂ's men as her former classmate. ÃÂamila's son ÃÂermin Omanoviàrevealed that ÃÂamila heard another one of her Serb former classmates threatening with roasting "children on a spit". Distressed, ÃÂamila unsuccessfully attempted suicide at one point. She later urged ÃÂermin and ÃÂermin's sister to separate from her, because she feared they would indeed get skewered on a spit if seen with her. When convoys started leaving the UN base for Tuzla, she managed to get on board with her children and grandchild. ÃÂermin, who was 14 years old at the time, testified that she jumped out of the truck as soon as it departed, because she did not want to risk her children's lives. ÃÂermin and his sister arrived to Kladanj, while ÃÂamila managed to get to Tuzla after all. Later, she testified at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), and died in 2007 from a heart attack. Nesib Mandà ¾iÃÂ, just like Muharem in the film, was told by Mladiàthat he held the destiny of his people in his hands.
The real-life UN translator Emir SuljagiÃÂ served as the basis for the character of Tarik. Just like Tarik attempted to rescue the SelmanagiÃÂ family, SuljagiÃÂ tried to rescue Muhamed NuhanoviÃÂ listing him as the member of the base's personnel. Muhamed, just like the SelmanagiÃÂ family, was crossed out by the Dutch and was expelled from the base. SuljagiÃÂ also made another list, writing down the names of all 239 civilians inside of the base, including his grandfather Sadik HasanoviÃÂ, an imam. SuljagiÃÂ added Hasan NuhanoviÃÂ's parents and brother later; all 239 were expelled from the base.
Just like Aida begged the Dutch to protect her family, Hasan NuhanoviÃÂ begged them to protect his. Muhamed NuhanoviÃÂ, just like Sejo SelmanagiÃÂ, rebelliously put out his cigarette, told Hasan (i.e. Aida in the film) not to beg anymore, and left with the Serbs. On 11 July 1995, Muhamed was twelve days shy of his 21st birthday, unlike Sejo who was 17 years old in the film. Hasan identified Muhamed's remains by the clothing, just like Aida did in the film. Ibro's remains had Hasan's UN ID with them; Hasan had given it to Muhamed, hoping it would have saved him somehow, and stated that he takes that as proof that Muhamed and Ibro were together.
Ibro and Muhamed were buried in the Branjevo primary mass grave, and their remains were later relocated to the ÃÂanÃÂari Road secondary mass graves near Kamenica. Ibro and Muhamed were most likely executed in the Dom Kulture club in Pilica near Zvornik; this was also depicted in the film. Dom Kulture was notable for its location in the town centre, unlike all other execution sites which were on remote locations; this was also reflected in the film, which shows Serb residents of the town drinking coffee on their balconies while gunshots are heard from Dom Kulture. According to Draà ¾en ErdemoviÃÂ's ICTY testimony, he and his VRS comrades were indeed sitting in a pub in Pilica across from Dom Kulture while gunshots and explosions could be heard from inside the building. Nasiha Nuhanoviàleft the UN base for Kladanj on one of the buses from the convoy, but she was separated from her companions before reaching the town. She, alongside six more people, was taken to Jarovlje near Vlasenica where they were executed and their bodies burned; her remains were found at a garbage dump near Vlasenica in 2009.
In charge of Vlasenica was Milenko StaniÃÂ, who served as a loose basis for the character of Joka. His family did move into the NuhanoviÃÂ family's apartment. Unlike Joka's wife Vesna in the film, the real-life Vesna StaniÃÂ chased Hasan NuhanoviÃÂ away from the apartment's front door in 2000 and did not give him his family photographs. At that time, Milenko StaniÃÂ was the president of Serb Democratic Party's Vlasenica branch. Hasan received his family's photographs in 2002 in Sarajevo, from a Serb lady who was his Serb friend's girlfriend's mother. She lived in the NuhanoviÃÂ apartment after the NuhanoviÃÂs fled and before the StaniÃÂs moved in. As with Aida in the film, these photographs are Hasan's only memories of his dead family.
On Rotten Tomatoes, of critic reviews are positive, and the average rating is . The critics consensus on the website states: "Quo Vadis, Aida? uses one woman's heartbreaking conflict to offer a searing account of war's devastating human toll." According to Metacritic, the film received "universal acclaim" based on a weighted average score of 97 out of 100 from 16 critic reviews. It was declared Metacritic's Official Best Movie of 2021 and Best International Movie of 2021.
Ryan Gilbey of New Statesman stated "à ½baniàhas shaped the factual into an eloquent and conscientious picture that purrs along as suspensefully as any ticking-bomb thriller, using ÃÂuriÃÂiÃÂ's performance as its engine." Jude Dry of IndieWire wrote that "à ½baniàlays bare the deeply human toll of violence and war", and Peter Bradshaw wrote in The Guardian that "after 25 years, the time has come to look again at the horror of Srebrenica, and à ½baniàhas done this with clear-eyed compassion and candor." Jessica Kiang for Variety states that "this is not historical revisionism, if anything, Quo Vadis, Aida? works to un-revise history, re-centering the victims' plight as the eye of a storm of evilsâÂÂnot only the massacre itself, but the broader evils of institutional failure and international indifference." Kevin Maher writes in The Times that "it's incendiary, furiously committed film-making from the director Jasmila à ½baniÃÂ, who also adds an unnerving ending about the burden that Srebrenica survivors still bear."
"The final act of Quo Vadis, Aida . . . makes clear that many other perpetrators escaped with impunity," writes film critic A. O. Scott in The New York Times. "The war ended, and some version of normalcy returned, but à ½baniàtakes no consolation in the banal observation that life goes on. It's true that time passes, that memory fades, that history is a record of mercy as well as of savagery. But it's also trueâÂÂas this unforgettable film insistsâÂÂthat loss is permanent and unanswerable."
Jurica PaviÃÂiàof Jutarnji list praised à ½baniàfor making a film about the Srebrenica genocide, deeming it "the riskiest move of not only the Sarajevan filmmaker, but the entire Bosnian-Herzegovinian cinema." He further praised her for managing to deal with the subject without swerving into "chauvinist slop", unlike the Croatian films from the 1990s, despite his initial scepticism. He finally compared Srebrenica in the aftermath of the massacre to Vukovar in the aftermath of the Vukovar massacre: "In Vukovar, the Croat majority is in power, and what's more â Croatian nationalism embodied in Ivan Penava. Srebrenica, on the other hand, ended up within the territorial scope of Republika Srpska and Dodik's party [<nowiki/>SNSD] is in power. One would say: as if the crime in Srebrenica â paid off." Writing for the same publication, Nenad Polimac praised à ½baniÃÂ's decision to focus on Aida's desperation and hysteria as she's trying to save her family, and not the horrors taking place in and around the town: "In this regard, Quo Vadis, Aida? is a virtuoso directed film in which à ½baniàdemonstrated a skill we had no idea she possessed. [...] Overall, Jasmila à ½baniàmade a very brave film about a delicate subject, which most of her colleagues would have turned into a pathetic epic, but she stuck to her concept and didn't make (too many) mistakes."
Hasan NuhanoviÃÂ, however, criticised some scenes from the film, namely the scene when Emir Hadà ¾ihafizbegoviÃÂ's character demands to be let into the UN base: "The point of the film was not supposed to be the arrogance of the Serb forces towards UNPROFOR, but rather a deliberate action by the Serb side to show the world a civilized face, while killing, shooting, and slaying Bosniaks, while at the same time UNPROFOR was busy with themselves. Go there, to the left, etc., all cultured, civilized, until the victim steps in front of the machine guns."
In September 2020, Quo Vadis, Aida? was selected as the Bosnian entry for the Best International Feature Film at the 93rd Academy Awards, making the shortlist of fifteen films. On 15 March 2021, the film was officially recognized as a nominee in that category. It won the Audience Award at the 50th edition of the International Film Festival Rotterdam and the Best International Film Award at the 2021 Gothenburg Film Festival. The film was also nominated for and later on won the Best International Film Award at the 36th Independent Spirit Awards. In March 2021, 74th British Academy Film Awards nominated the film for Best Film Not in the English Language and à ½baniàearned a nomination in the Best Director category.
In December 2021, Quo Vadis, Aida? won the Award for Best Film at the 34th European Film Awards. Also, à ½baniàwon the Award for Best Director and Jasna ÃÂuriÃÂiàwon the Award for Best Actress at the same awards.