Proto-Romance language

Proto-Romance is the result of applying the comparative method to reconstruct the latest common ancestor of the Romance languages. The closest real-life counterpart to Proto-Romance would have been a colloquial variety of Late Latin sometimes referred to as Vulgar Latin.

Phonology

Vowels

Monophthongs

Diphthong

appears to be the only phonemic diphthong that can be reconstructed.

Phonetics

• Vowels were lengthened in stressed open syllables.
• Stressed may have yielded incipient diphthongs like in metaphonic conditions.
• Metaphony, if it can be projected back to Proto-Romance, may have initially been limited to open syllables. That is, it would have targeted allophonically lengthened .

Constraints

• did not occur in unstressed position.
• did not occur in the second syllable of words with the structure ˌσσˈσσ.

Consonants

Palatalized consonants

• There is scholarly disagreement over whether palatalization was phonemic in Proto-Romance.
• Palatalized consonants tended to geminate between vowels. The extent of this varied by consonant.'
• would have been an affricate like or .

Phonetics

• in word-initial position was assigned a prop-vowel [ɪ], as in .'
• was likely at first, with later developments varying by region.'
• might have been fricatives or approximants between vowels.
• might have been retroflex.'
• might have been bilabial.

Constraints

• did not occur in intervocalic position.

Morphology

The forms below are spelt as they are in the cited sources, either in Latin style or in phonetic notation. The latter may not always agree with the phonology given above.

Nouns

Nouns are reconstructed as having three cases: a nominative, an accusative, and a genitive-dative:'

Some nouns of the –C type had inflections with alternating stress or syllable count:

There were also ‘neuter’ nouns. In the singular they would have been treated as masculine and in the plural as feminine, often with a collective sense.

Adjectives

Positive

Comparative

For the most part, the typical way to form a comparative would have been to add magis or plus (‘more’) to a positive adjective. A few words can be reconstructed as having a comparative ending -ior, which would have been inflected as follows:'

Superlative

Superlatives would have been formed by adding definite articles to comparatives.

Pronouns

Personal

Tonic

The stressed or 'strong' forms:

Atonic

The unstressed or 'weak' forms:

Interrogative/relative

As follows:

Verbs

Present

Preterite

Participles

See also

• Phonological changes from Classical Latin to Proto-Romance

Notes

References

Bibliography

• Original in German: