In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a PROP is a symmetric strict monoidal category whose objects are the natural numbers n identified with the finite sets and whose tensor product is given on objects by the addition on numbers. Because of âÂÂsymmetricâÂÂ, for each n, the symmetric group on n letters is given as a subgroup of the automorphism group of n. The name PROP is an abbreviation of "PROduct and Permutation category".
The notion was introduced by Frank Adams and Saunders Mac Lane; the topological version of it was later given by Michael Boardman and Rainer Vogt. Following them, J. P. May then introduced the term âÂÂoperadâÂÂ, which is a particular kind of PROP, for the object that Boardman and Vogt called the "category of operators in standard form".
There are the following inclusions of full subcategories:
where the first category is the category of (symmetric) operads.
An important elementary class of PROPs are the sets of all matrices (regardless of number of rows and columns) over some fixed ring . More concretely, these matrices are the morphisms of the PROP; the objects can be taken as either (sets of vectors) or just as the plain natural numbers (since objects do not have to be sets with some structure). In this example:
There are also PROPs of matrices where the product is the Kronecker product, but in that class of PROPs the matrices must all be of the form (sides are all powers of some common base ); these are the coordinate counterparts of appropriate symmetric monoidal categories of vector spaces under tensor product.
Further examples of PROPs:
If the requirement âÂÂsymmetricâ is dropped, then one gets the notion of PRO category. If âÂÂsymmetricâ is replaced by braided, then one gets the notion of PROB category.
is a PROB but not a PROP.
is an example of PRO that is not even a PROB.
An algebra of a PRO in a monoidal category is a strict monoidal functor from to . Every PRO and category give rise to a category of algebras whose objects are the algebras of in and whose morphisms are the natural transformations between them.
For example:
More precisely, what we mean here by "the algebras of in are the monoid objects in " for example is that the category of algebras of in is equivalent to the category of monoids in .