The OHCHR Fact-Finding Report: Human Rights Violations and Abuses related to the Protests of July and August 2024 in Bangladesh was prepared by the United Nations fact-finding mission team on Bangladesh. It is the result of an independent investigation by Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) into human rights violations that occurred in the country between 1 July and 15 August 2024. The investigation focused on the government's handling of the July uprising during this period, including allegations of extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, detention and torture and the suppression of free speech. The mission sought to gather facts, identify responsible parties and propose recommendations to prevent future violations.
In the summer of 2024, Bangladesh experienced a wave of student protests demanding political reforms, better economic opportunities, and broader civil liberties. These protests grew significantly from July through mid-August and led to large-scale confrontations with security forces. The government's response to the protests included the deployment of police and military units, which led to violent clashes. Over 1,400 people were reported to have died as a result of the violence during this period, with numerous others injured, detained, or subjected to mistreatment. The violence, combined with reports of human rights abuses, prompted both domestic and international calls for an independent investigation into the events. In response, the interim government of Bangladesh, led by chief adviser Muhammad Yunus, requested the United Nations to send a fact-finding team to investigate the situation. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights formed the fact-finding team to determine the scope of the violations and to provide an independent and impartial assessment of the events.
The primary objectives of the OHCHR Fact-Finding Team was to establish the facts regarding the human rights violations that occurred between July and August 2024. This involved collecting evidence from various sources, including direct testimonies from victims and witnesses, documents, photographs, and videos that were not publicly available. The team also sought to identify responsibilities for the abuses, including whether any government officials, security forces, or other groups were responsible for violations of international human rights law.
Another objective was to analyse the root causes of the violence, particularly the political, social, and economic factors that contributed to the unrest. The mission sought to determine whether the violence was a result of systemic repression or specific actions taken by the government or law enforcement. Furthermore, the team aimed to provide concrete recommendations to the government of Bangladesh on how to address past violations and prevent such abuses from occurring in the future.
The Adviser for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Md. Touhid Hossain reiterated the government's support of the mission.
The OHCHR Fact-Finding Team started their investigation on 14 September 2024 into the events of July and August 2024. The team visited several key cities in Bangladesh, including Dhaka, Chattogram, Rangpur, and other locations affected by the protests and violence. Interviews were conducted with a range of individuals, including victims, witnesses, law enforcement officers, and medical practitioners. The team also collected information from human rights organisations, civil society groups, and other stakeholders involved in the protests.
As part of its investigation, the mission called for submissions from individuals, groups, and organisations to provide additional evidence or testimonies that had not been made publicly available. The mission's investigation was independent of any national legal processes. The fact-finding team worked under the mandate of the United Nations Human Rights Office to determine the facts but did not have the authority to prosecute or arrest individuals.
The United Nations fact-finding mission on Bangladesh, published the report on 12 February 2025 by the OHCHR, documented widespread human rights violations during the protests between July and August 2024. The report, based on over 250 interviews and various digital pieces of evidence, outlined several key issues and conclusions regarding the crackdown by former Bangladeshi government officials.
The report made several recommendations to address the violations identified:
Following the report, interim government's chief adviser Muhammad Yunus expressed his support for the report, stating:
Bangladesh Nationalist Party, one of the major opposition parties, welcomed the report and its findings, calling it a "wake-up call" for the Bangladeshi government. Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, the BNP general secretary, stated that the UN report was a critical document that confirmed widespread repression and political violence and called on the Indian government to repatriate Hasina.
Shafiqur Rahman, ameer of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, also endorsed the report calling it "a document of genocide" and called on the Interim Government to prosecute the perpetrators.
Mohammad A. Arafat, former Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting of Awami League urged global action against the interim government, citing the report highlights public fear under the administration. He also denied state-led violence as a conspiracy, accusing Muhammad YunusâÂÂs administration of feeding false testimonies to UN inspectors using coerced state employees. While acknowledging security force lapses during past unrest, he demands YunusâÂÂs resignation for partisan governance, advocating a return to presidential authority and fair elections to restore democracy and stability.
The report mentioned that UN warned the Bangladesh Army about their human rights violations during protests, as involvements on human rights violations can cause restrictions from the United Nations peacekeeping. In reaction, Inter-Services Public Relations denied it and said that the army is not aware about warning and probably the warning was given to the government instead of the army. They also claimed that the army worked for keep people safe during the protests.