Mihovil Klaià(August 19, 1829 â January 3, 1896) was a Croatian politician and a leader of the Croatian national revival in Dalmatia.
KlaiÃÂ was born in Dubrovnik. He obtained a PhD in architecture in Padua, Italy.
He was a member of the National Party and was elected as member of the Diet of Dalmatia in the National Committee. Miho KlaiÃÂ was President of the Diet of Dalmatia and created the newspaper Il Nazionale.
Despite the persecution of the Austrian government, he fought all his life for the introduction of Croatian into education and demanded the administrative union of the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia with Dalmatia.
Within the People's Party, KlaiÃÂ quickly came into conflict with Mihovil PavlinoviÃÂ, though PavlinoviÃÂ eventually gave up on enforcing his views over the entire party and privately rejected the Interconfessional laws that the German liberals had passed in 1868, 1869 and 1874, which strengthened the powers of state over those of the church.
In the majority Serbian district of Obrovac, which had voted for the Zemljaci in 1873, a feeling of betrayal prevailed after certain political decisions by the now-ruling People's Party, including a lack of fulfilment of certain promises made by KlaiÃÂ. After a series of meetings held in the Krka monastery from October 1873 to February 1874 under the leadership of Vladimir Desnica, Vladimir SimiÃÂ, Nikodim Milaà ¡, and . It drew up a list of demands from Mihovil KlaiÃÂ, seeking from him an affirmation of the equality of the Serbian ethnonym, language and script, the removal of "clericals" from the party's mouthpiece, Narodni list and the introduction of Cyrillic into public schools as a sign of Pan-Slavic reciprocity. The demands did not represent an ultimatum, being under the influence of the more pragmatic Vladimir SimiÃÂ. Similar demands had been made to Klaiàin a private letter likely from Simiàbefore the 1873 election, and in response to the 1874 demands he replied publicly in Narodni list.
On 29 January 1877, Stjepan Mitrov Ljubià ¡a gave a speech before the Diet of Dalmatia in which openly opposed the unification of Dalmatia with Croatia-Slavonia. With the assent of KlaiÃÂ, with whom Ljubià ¡a had a personal feud, the decision was made in the People's Party to target Ljubià ¡a. They had the verification commission annul Ljubià ¡a's election on the grounds that one of his voters had not yet been of age. The People's Party, in the majority, accepted the proposal. In his final address, Ljubià ¡a held a speech accusing the People's Party of religious and ethnic intolerance, declaring that the Serbian national movement would work independently in the future. Shortly thereafter, Nikodim Milaà ¡ published an article in Glas Crnogorca calling for the foundation of a separate Serbian party in Dalmatia with its own media outlet, because of the loss of confidence of the Serbs in the People's Party. The result was a lasting exchange of polemics between Narodni list representing the Croats with Pavlinoviàat their head and Glas Crnogorca and ' representing the Serbs with Milaà ¡ at their head.
On the Bosnian question of the 1870s in the leadup to the Austro-Hungarian campaign of 1878, two opposite opinions on the fate of the Bosnian vilayet formed in the Diet of Dalmatia. Mihovil PavlinoviÃÂ led the People's Party in arguing it ought to be annexed by Austria-Hungary, and then given to the Croatian element of the Triune Kingdom they desired. KlaiÃÂ, still a People's Party candidate but increasingly intermediate between the Party norm and the Slavic wing of the Autonomist Party, preferred a Serbian annexation of Bosnia and eventually of the same territory the People's Party wanted for their Kingdom of Croatia, including Dalmatia.
After the Austrian occupation of Bosnia, however, KlaiÃÂ accepted the change as a done deal. During the elections in July 1879, KlaiÃÂ ran as a People's Party candidate for the electoral district Zadar-Pag-Benkovac-Obrovac. Zadar remained the last stronghold of the Autonomist Party, leaving the Serbian voters of Benkovac and Obrovac with the decisive vote. The election became especially contentious in Obrovac, where the Serbs refused to accept the program of the People's Party to unite all four, and now five, kingdoms, into a single "Croatian" kingdom, which Sava BjelanoviÃÂ would later term the "Quintune" kingdom (), referring to Bosnia, Slavonia, Croatia, Fiume (or part of the Austrian Littoral) and Dalmatia. Some compromise-leaning Serbs proposed or Jovo MedoviÃÂ run instead of KlaiÃÂ. PavlinoviÃÂ proposed the municipal administrator () of Obrovac, Vladimir SimiÃÂ, run. This would have been just to prevent the development of a Serb-Autonomist coalition, but such a coalition was already forming. The Autonomists decided to run Gustav IvaniÃÂ against KlaiÃÂ, as IvaniÃÂ was a son-in-law of the Zadar Autonomist leader . IvaniÃÂ signed a list of demands from the Serbs, including the rejection of uniting Dalmatia with Croatia-Slavonia and the recognition of the Serbs as an independent ethnicity. Even with KlaiÃÂ, the People's Party was unwilling to match IvaniÃÂ's demands, and lost the election in December. It was the first loss of many to the new Italo-Serbian coalition, and this gained the Autonomists a majority in the Diet of Dalmatia. Many Croats of the People's Party then accused the Serbs of treachery.
Upon the foundation of the Serbian Party, KlaiÃÂ took a relatively mild stance against it for a Croat politician, as he considered it likely to dissipate over time, without support from the government at any level. For this reason, he considered it prudent to simply ignore the party. Following this advice, the Narodni list paid only peripheral attention to the Serbian Party in 1880 and 1881, and generally within the scope of attacks on the Autonomists. PavlinoviÃÂ ended this at the end of 1881 with a polemic directed against Sava BjelanoviÃÂ, because BjelanoviÃÂ had signed a letter of criticism of PavlinoviÃÂ as a "Catholic Serb", to which PavlinoviÃÂ responded with accusing BjelanoviÃÂ of trying to convert Catholic Slavs to Serbdom.
Soon after, Srpski list was founded to represent the new Serbian party. It directed most of its criticism against PavlinoviÃÂ, while deriding KlaiÃÂ's liberal wing as PavlinoviÃÂ's "subjects" (). Sava BjelanoviÃÂ led a liberal Serbian wing, often supported by Serbian Eastern Catholics, especially in Dubrovnik. BjelanoviÃÂ's death in 1897 led to a schism within the Serbian Party between conservatives and liberal-radicals.