Martin Lacko (Born in 1976 in Pieà ¡à ¥any) is a Slovak historian. He specialises in modern Slovak history, particularly the period of the Slovak state from 1939 to 1945. Originally a mainstream historian with internationally acclaimed and cited works, Lacko has been considered controversial since 2014 due to his historical revisionist positions and his open support for the far-right ýSNS party.
Lacko studied history and philosophy at the Comenius University. He completed his doctorate at the Historical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences in Bratislava. Lacko worked as a member of the scientific research section of the National Memory Institute in Bratislava. He specializes in Slovak history during the Second World War and has published over 30 academic studies on this topic in Slovakia and abroad.
In 2002âÂÂ2004, he organised the conference Slovenská republika 1939-1945 oÃÂami mladých historikov (The Slovak Republic 1939âÂÂ1945 in the Eyes of Young Historians) three times. Lacko was regarded (see section Controversies) as one of the most renowned Slovak historians of the so-called âÂÂyoung generation of historiansâÂÂ, who in their assessment of Slovak history, especially the Slovak state, see themselves as a middle way between the âÂÂglorifying worksâ of exiled Slovak historians such as Milan Stanislav ÃÂurica and Frantià ¡ek Vnuk and the âÂÂstrongly negative worksâ of Slovak historians still active under the communist regime such as Ivan Kamenec and Duà ¡an KováÃÂ.
Lacko was originally regarded as a renowned historian in Slovakia. Lacko's work also attracted international attention. For example, the German historian Tatjana Tönsmeyer (2011) wrote in her review of Lacko's 2008 monograph on the Slovak National Uprising:
The picture of the uprising painted by Lacko is much more multifaceted than earlier accounts, but Tönsmeyer is critical of the fact that Lacko does not take into account the results of international research and, in Tönsmeyer's opinion, pursues a âÂÂhistorical-political intentionâÂÂ. Lacko constructs an image of history for Slovak society for which he claims âÂÂtruthâÂÂ, offers military âÂÂheroesâ in particular and hopes that his readership will take a positive view of Slovak statehood. The German historian Martin Zückert also comments on Lacko's monograph on the Slovakian National Uprising. In his essay (2011) on the Slovakian resistance against the Tiso regime, Zückert categorises Lacko's work among those accounts that âÂÂcritically assess the role of the partisans and the Soviet Unionâ and have recently caused controversy in Slovakia. The Czech historian Lenka à  indeláà Âová (2013), on the other hand, writes about Lacko's account of the history of Slovakia from 1939 to 1945, also published in 2008, that Lacko's work and that of Ivan Kamenec and Ján KorÃÂek in particular proved to be helpful for an overall picture of developments in the Slovak state.
In 2014, a controversy broke out in Slovakia over Lacko. The ultra-nationalist Slovakian website www.29august1944.sk, which criticised the Slovak National Uprising against the National Socialists and the Slovak collaborationist regime as an âÂÂanti-national betrayalâÂÂ, named Martin Lacko as one of the historians supporting it. Since then, he has been cited in Slovakian media as a âÂÂcontroversial historianâÂÂ.
At the end of October 2015, Lacko signed a declaration supporting Marian Kotleba's far-right party against the backdrop of the ongoing election campaign for the 2016 parliamentary elections. In early September 2016, Lacko was dismissed as an employee of the âÂÂInstitute of the Memory of the Nationâ (Slovak: ÃÂstav pamäti národa, ÃÂPN), which investigates the crimes of both the National Socialists and the Communists in Slovakia. In 2017, it became known that Lacko was now officially working as an assistant to MP Natália Grausová from the Kotleba party.
Document collections
Monographs