MÃÂnuka honey () is a monofloral honey produced from the nectar of the mÃÂnuka tree, Leptospermum scoparium.
The mÃÂnuka tree is indigenous to New Zealand and parts of coastal Australia. The word mÃÂnuka is the MÃÂori name of the tree; however, as with many MÃÂori words, the older spelling manuka (without a macron) remains relatively common in English.
The mÃÂnuka tree (Leptospermum scoparium), from which mÃÂnuka honey is derived, has long been regarded as a taonga (treasure) in MÃÂori tradition. The plant was used in rongoÃÂ (traditional medicine), with infusions of the leaves taken for colds and fevers, and oils or poultices from the bark applied to wounds and skin conditions. In MÃÂori cosmology, mÃÂnuka is associated with TÃÂne Mahuta, the atua (god) of forests, reinforcing its status as a plant of mana (prestige) and spiritual significance.
In contemporary New Zealand, mÃÂnuka honey has become both a cultural emblem and a commercial product. It is frequently described as âÂÂliquid goldâ in media and marketing, symbolising natural heritage and national identity. The honey is often presented as a premium gift in ceremonial contexts and is used to promote New ZealandâÂÂs image abroad. For MÃÂori enterprises, mÃÂnuka honey production is also linked to cultural revitalisation and economic development, connecting indigenous stewardship of land with participation in global trade.
MÃÂnuka honey is produced by European honey bees (Apis mellifera) foraging on the mÃÂnuka (Leptospermum scoparium), which evidence suggests originated in Australia before the onset of the Miocene aridity. It grows uncultivated throughout both southeastern Australia and New Zealand.
The mÃÂnuka tree flowers at the same time as Kunzea ericoides, another Myrtaceae species also called kÃÂnuka, which often shares the same growing areas. Some apiarists cannot readily differentiate these species, as both flowers have similar morphology and pollen differentiation between the two species is difficult.
There have been increasing turf disputes between producers operating close to large mÃÂnuka tree clumps. Cases have been reported of many hives being variously sabotaged, poisoned, or stolen.
MÃÂnuka honey is composed primarily of fructose and glucose, with smaller amounts of sucrose and maltose, having a relatively higher total sugar content compared to Malaysian honeys. It is markedly viscous, has a dark cream to dark brown colour, and a strong flavour, characterised as "earthy, oily, herbaceous", and "florid, rich and complex". It is described by the New Zealand honey industry as having a "damp earth, heather, aromatic" aroma, and a "mineral, slightly bitter" flavour.
MÃÂnuka honey contains leptosperin, lepteridine and 2â²-methoxyacetophenone, which are unique to mÃÂnuka among honeys, as well as flavonoids and phenolic compounds. It also contains o-anisic acid, 2â²-methoxyacetophenone, kojic acid, dihydroxyacetone, methylglyoxal, flavonoids, glyoxal, 3-deoxyglucosulose, methyl-syringate and leptosin.
MÃÂnuka honey for export from New Zealand must be independently tested to verify that it is derived from the tree. The Ministry for Primary Industries has developed a government standard called the MÃÂnuka Honey Science Definition test to ensure that all mÃÂnuka honey is pure when it leaves the country. The test has five attributes, four of which are chemical, and one of which is the DNA of Leptospermum scoparium. The honey must pass all five tests to be labeled as pure New Zealand mÃÂnuka honey. This testing came into effect on 5 January 2018. Independent quality and rating organisation, the UMF Honey Association then certifies four quality factors for honey harvested, packed, and sealed in New Zealand.
The UMF Honey Association was originally known as the Active MÃÂnuka Honey Association (AMHA), and was formed in 2002. In 2011, the AMHA became The Unique Manuka Factor Honey Association (UMFHA).
The Australian MÃÂnuka Honey Association (AMHA) was established in 2017 following the discontinuation of the New Zealand MÃÂnuka Honey industry's use of the acronym AMHA. They established a set of standards for authentic Australian mÃÂnuka honey to be pure natural mÃÂnuka honey, produced entirely in Australia, and be tested by an independent, approved laboratory to ensure it meets minimum standards of naturally occurring methylglyoxal (MGO), dihydroxyacetone (DHA), and leptosperin; authenticity carries the AMHA's Mark of Authenticity. The Australian standard of authencitiy requires that mÃÂnuka honey has at least 85 mg per kg of MGO and 170 mg per kg of DHA. According to the AMHA, "MGO is responsible for much of the special activity of mÃÂnuka honey", deriving from the honey chemical DHA, which occurs naturally in the flower nectar of mÃÂnuka trees.
In New Zealand, mÃÂnuka honey is graded by the amount of natural signature chemicals it contains, and is dual-graded using MGO (methylglyoxal) concentration in mg/kg and UMF (Unique MÃÂnuka Factor). Blended (multifloral) mÃÂnuka is graded using the MGS system, which has a linear relationship with MGO value, but is numerically different from UMF.
In the UK, mÃÂnuka honey is graded with MGO and NPA (non-peroxide activity), which measures the non-peroxide activity in the honey. The NPA is positively correlated with MGO content, and is made to be numerically near-identical to the UMF.
There is also a K-factor rating, which counts the number of pollen particles, having no correlation with the concentration of any active chemical. UMF, MGS, and K-factor collectively indicate that the honey is genuine.
MÃÂnuka honey is one of New ZealandâÂÂs most valuable primary exports, commanding premium prices in international markets due to its distinctive chemical profile and reputation for quality. In 2020, mÃÂnuka honey exports were valued at approximately NZ$446 million, representing more than 90% of the countryâÂÂs total honey export earnings. By 2024, export value had declined to NZ$387 million.
Industry analysts describe the sector as highly cyclical, with periods of rapid expansion followed by sharp contractions. Between 2020 and 2023, production volumes fell by more than 50%, while export demand dropped by over a quarter, leading to downward pressure on prices.
Although New Zealand remains the largest producer, mÃÂnuka honey is also harvested in Australia from related Leptospermum species, creating competition over branding and market access. Globally, mÃÂnuka honey accounts for a small fraction of total honey volume but a disproportionately high share of value. New Zealand produces only about 1% of the worldâÂÂs honey by volume but captures nearly 9% of global trade value, largely due to mÃÂnuka exports.
Demand is concentrated in a handful of overseas markets. Research by New Zealand Trade and Enterprise found that in the United States, five brands controlled 84% of online mÃÂnuka honey sales in 2022, reflecting strong brand consolidation and barriers to entry for smaller producers. Other major markets include China, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan, where grading systems such as UMF (Unique MÃÂnuka Factor) and MGO (methylglyoxal content) strongly influence price differentiation.
As a result of the high premium paid for mÃÂnuka honey, an increasing number of products now labeled as such worldwide are adulterated or counterfeit. According to research by the Unique MÃÂnuka Factor Honey Association (UMFHA), the main trade association of New Zealand mÃÂnuka honey producers (New Zealand being the main producer of mÃÂnuka honey in the world), while only of mÃÂnuka honey are produced in New Zealand every year, six times as much are marketed internationally as mÃÂnuka honey, of which are in the UK alone.
In governmental agency tests in the UK between 2011 and 2013, a majority of mÃÂnuka-labeled honeys sampled lacked the non-peroxide anti-microbial activity of mÃÂnuka honey. Likewise, of 73 samples tested by UMFHA in Britain, China, and Singapore in 2012âÂÂ13, 43 tested negative. Separate UMFHA tests in Hong Kong found that 14 out of 56 mÃÂnuka honeys sampled had been adulterated with syrup. In 2013, the UK Food Standards Agency asked trading standards authorities to alert mÃÂnuka honey vendors to the need for legal compliance.
The UMFHA trademarked a honey rating system called Unique MÃÂnuka Factor, but there is a confusing range of competing rating systems for mÃÂnuka honeys. In one UK chain in 2013, two products were labeled "12+ active" and "30+ total activity", respectively, for "naturally occurring peroxide activity", and another "active 12+" for "total phenol activity", yet none of the three was labeled for strength of the non-peroxide antimicrobial activity specific to mÃÂnuka honey.
Between 2022 and 2025, the US FDA issued warning letters to four manufacturers (including an Australian company) of mÃÂnuka honey products advertised as eye therapies, and one claiming anti-allergic properties. The FDA stated that these manufacturers were advertising unapproved drugs, making false health claims, and engaging in illegal interstate commerce of misbranded drugs.