Malik ibn Nuwayra (: died 632), was the chief of the Banu Yarbu, a clan of the Banu Hanzala, which was a large section of the powerful tribe of Bani Tamim.
Malik was appointed by Muhammad to collect zakah for the Banu Yarbu, but after MuhammadâÂÂs death, he reportedly refused to send it to Medina. Abu Bakr ordered his execution through Khalid ibn al-Walid, with historical sources attributing it to alleged apostasy.
Malik was reportedly appointed by Muhammad as the collector of the ('alms tax') for his clan. After MuhammadâÂÂs death, he is said to have withheld zakah, prompting Abu Bakr to order his execution through Khalid ibn al-Walid. In 632, KhalidâÂÂs forces encountered Malik and his men, who affirmed their faith and offered no resistance. Despite objections from an Ansarite companion, Khalid reportedly ordered their execution and later married MalikâÂÂs widow, Layla bint al-Minhal. Umar is said to have urged KhalidâÂÂs removal from command, but Abu Bakr reportedly declined, stating, âÂÂI will not sheathe a sword which God has drawn for His service.âÂÂ
Historians suggest Malik was executed for apostasy, citing his alleged support for Sajah, a self-proclaimed prophetess, his refusal to recognize Muhammad as a prophet, or his denial of zakah obligations. According to 8th-century historian Sayf ibn Umar, Malik allied with Sajah, his kinswoman, but abandoned her after her defeat by Banu Tamim clans and returned to al-Butah, where he faced Muslim forces. Sayf and other early historians, such as al-Tabari, noted that Malik called Muhammad "your companion" and rejected zakah. However, Wilferd Madelung disputes this, arguing that if Malik had renounced Islam, Umar and others would not have opposed his execution. Ali al-Sallabi emphasizes MalikâÂÂs refusal to pay zakah as the primary issue, citing early sources like Ibn Sallam al-Jumahi and al-Nawawi, who state that some apostates, continued to perform prayer but rejected zakah, thereby denying a core pillar of Islam. Ibn Hajar cites a narration in which MalikâÂÂs brother admitted his apostasy, which he presents as evidence for why Umar, during his caliphate, took no action against Khalid regarding the incident. Ibn Taymiyyah defends Khalid, arguing that his decision was a valid ijtihad and that the case remains uncertain; he adds that criticizing Khalid would involve speculation, which is prohibited in Islamic law.
Due to conflicting early sources, the exact circumstances of MalikâÂÂs death remain unclear. Ella Landau-Tasseron notes that "the truth behind Malik's career and death is likely to remain obscured by a multitude of conflicting reports." Al-Dhahabi emphasizes the prior piety of those involved and cautioned against both excessive praise and unjust blame. W. Montgomery Watt adds that the sources on Banu Tamim during the Ridda Wars are unclear, partly due to "the enemies of KhÃÂlid b. al-Walëd have twisted the stories to blacken him".