The MahÃÂvÃÂkyas (sing.: , ; plural: , ) are the 'Great Sayings' of the Upanishads, with mahÃÂ meaning 'great' and vÃÂkya <nowiki></nowiki>sentence'. The MahÃÂvÃÂkyas are traditionally considered to be four in number, though actually five are prominent in the post-Vedic literature:
MahÃÂvÃÂkyas are instrumental in Advaita Vedanta, as they are regarded as valid scriptural statements that reveal the self (), which appears as a separate individual existence (), is, in essence, non-different (not two-ness) from Brahman, which, according to Advaita, is nirguna. In contrast, these statements are less prominent in most other Hindu traditions, which emphasize a qualified or dualistic relationship between the self and Brahman, whom they regard as saguna, often identified with Vishnu, Shiva, Shakti, etc.
People who are initiated into sannyasa in Advaita Vedanta are being taught the four [principal] mahavakyas as four mantras, "to attain this highest of states in which the individual self dissolves inseparably in Brahman". According to the Advaita Vedanta tradition, the four Upanishadic statements indicate the real identity of the individual (jivatman) as sat (the Existent), Brahman, consciousness. According to the Vedanta-tradition, the subject matter and the essence of all Upanishads are the same, and all the Upanishadic Mahavakyas express this one universal message in the form of terse and concise statements. In later Sanskrit usage, the term mahÃÂvÃÂkya came to mean "discourse", and specifically, discourse on a philosophically lofty topic.
The concept of mahavakyas has a prehistory in Mimamsa, where it differs from its use in Advaita Vedanta. Instead of a concise philosophical truth, a mahavakya in Mimamsa is a complex sentence that integrates and finalizes the meaning of smaller sentences (avantara-vakya). This structure follows the principle of paryavasana (completion), where the larger sentence absorbs its parts to become the primary source of authority. In full form, a mahavakya serves as a Vedic "ritual manual", unifying all instructions into a guide for performing the ritual.
Chandogya Upanishad 6.8.7, in the dialogue between Uddalaka and his son à Âvetaketu. It appears at the end of a section, and is repeated at the end of the subsequent sections as a refrain:
In ChU.6.8.12 it appears as follows:
Tat Tvam Asi (Devanagari: à ¤¤à ¤¤à ¥Âà ¤¤à ¥Âà ¤µà ¤®à ¤¸à ¤¿, Vedic: tát tvam ási) is traditionally translated as "Thou art that", "That thou art", "That art thou", "You are that", "That you are", or "You're it"; although according to Brereton and others the proper translation would be "In that way [=thus] are you, Svetaketu", or "that's how you are":
In Ch.U.6.8.7 tat refers to Sat, "the Existent", Existence, Being. Sat, "the Existent", then is the true essence or root or origin of everything that exists, and the essence, Atman, which the individual at the core is. As Shankara states in the Upadesasahasri:
While the Vedanta tradition equates sat ("the Existent") with Brahman, as stated in the Brahma Sutras, the Chandogya Upanishad itself does not refer to Brahman.
According to Brereton, followed by Patrick Olivelle and Wendy Doniger, the traditional translation as "you are that" is incorrect, and should be translated as "In that way [=thus] are you, Svetaketu." That, then, in ChU.6.8.12 refers to "the very nature of all existence as permeated by [the finest essence]", and which is also the nature of Svetaketu. Lipner expresses reservations on Brereton's interpretation, stating that it is technically plausible, but noting that "Brereton concedes that the philosophical import of the passage may be represented by the translation 'That you are', where tat as 'that' would refer to the supreme Being (sat/satya)."
Major Vedantic schools offer different interpretations of the phrase:
Aham BrahmÃÂsmi (Devanagari: à ¤ à ¤¹à ¤®à ¥ à ¤¬à ¥Âà ¤°à ¤¹à ¥Âà ¤®à ¤¾à ¤¸à ¥Âà ¤®à ¤¿), "I am Brahman" is in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.10 of the Shukla Yajurveda: Aham Brahmasmi is the core philosophy in advaita vedanta, indicating absolute oneness of atman with brahman.
Ahaá¹ BrahmÃÂsmi then means "I am the Absolute" or "My identity is cosmic", but can also be translated as "you are part of god just like any other element".
In his comment on this passage, Sankara explains that here Brahman is not the conditioned Brahman (saguna); that a transitory entity cannot be eternal; that knowledge about Brahman, the infinite all-pervading entity, has been enjoined; that knowledge of non-duality alone dispels ignorance; and that the meditation based on resemblance is only an idea. He also tells us that the expression Aham Brahmaasmi is the explanation of the mantra
He explains that non-duality and plurality are contradictory only when applied to the Self, which is eternal and without parts, but not to the effects, which have parts. The aham in this memorable expression is not closed in itself as a pure mental abstraction but it is radical openness. Between Brahman and aham-brahma lies the entire temporal universe experienced by the ignorant as a separate entity (duality).
VidyÃÂranya in his Panchadasi (V.4) explains:
Aitareya Upanishad 3.3 of the Rigveda, translation Olivelle:
Several translations, and word-orders of these translations, are possible:
PrajñÃÂnam:
PrajñÃÂnam as a whole means:
Related terms are jñÃÂna, prajñàand prajñam, "pure consciousness". Although the common translation of jñÃÂnam is "consciousness", the term has a broader meaning of "knowing"; "becoming acquainted with", "knowledge about anything", "awareness", "higher knowledge".
Brahman:
Meaning: Most interpretations state: "PrajñÃÂnam (noun) is Brahman (adjective)". Some translations give a reverse order, stating "Brahman is PrajñÃÂnam", specifically "Brahman (noun) is PrajñÃÂnam (adjective)": "The Ultimate Reality is wisdom (or consciousness)". Sahu explains:
And according to David Loy,
Ayam Atma Brahma () is a MahÃÂvÃÂkya which is found in 1-2 of the Mandukya Upanishad of the Atharvaveda:
In Sanskrit:
While translations tend to separate the sentence in separate parts, Olivelle's translation uses various words in adjunct sets of meaning:
The Mundaka Upanishad, in the first section of the second Mundaka, defines and explains the Atma-Brahma doctrine. It claims that just as a burning fire produces thousands of sparks and leaps and bounds in its own form, so the living beings originate from Brahman in its own form. Brahman is immortal, except the body, it is both external and internal, ever generated, except the mind, except the breath, yet from it emerges the inner soul of all things.
From Brahman breath, mind, senses, space, air, light, water, earth, everything is born. The section expands on this concept as follows,
The Mundaka Upanishad verse 2.2.2 claims that Atman-Brahman is real. Verse 2.2.3 offers help in the process of meditation, such as Om. Verse 2.2.8 claims that the one who possesses self-knowledge and has become one with Brahman is free, not affected by Karma, free from sorrow and Atma-doubt, he who is happy. The section expands on this concept as follows,
The Mandukya Upanishad repeatedly states that Om is ÃÂtman, and also states that turiya is ÃÂtman. The Mandukya Upanishad forms the basis of Gaudapada's Advaita Vedanta, in his Mandukya Karika.
According to the Guru Gita, "Ayam Atma Brahma" is a statement of practice.
====
<blockquote>à ¤¸à ¤°à ¥Âà ¤µà ¤ à ¤Âà ¤²à ¥Âà ¤µà ¤¿à ¤¦à ¤ à ¤¬à ¥Âà ¤°à ¤¹à ¥Âà ¤® à ¤¤à ¤Âà ¥Âà ¤Âà ¤²à ¤¾à ¤¨à ¤¿à ¤¤à ¤¿ à ¤¶à ¤¾à ¤¨à ¥Âà ¤¤ à ¤Âà ¤ªà ¤¾à ¤¸à ¥Âà ¤¤ à ¥¤ à ¤ à ¤¥ à ¤Âà ¤²à ¥ à ¤Âà ¥Âà ¤°à ¤¤à ¥Âà ¤®à ¤¯à ¤ à ¤ªà ¥Âà ¤°à ¥Âà ¤·à ¥ à ¤¯à ¤¥à ¤¾à ¤Âà ¥Âà ¤°à ¤¤à ¥Âà ¤°à ¤¸à ¥Âà ¤®à ¤¿à ¤Âà ¤²à ¥Âà ¤²à ¥Âà ¤Âà ¥ à ¤ªà ¥Âà ¤°à ¥Âà ¤·à ¥ à ¤Âà ¤µà ¤¤à ¤¿ à ¤¤à ¤¥à ¥Âà ¤¤à ¤ à ¤ªà ¥Âà ¤°à ¥Âà ¤¤à ¥Âà ¤¯ à ¤Âà ¤µà ¤¤à ¤¿ à ¤¸ à ¤Âà ¥Âà ¤°à ¤¤à ¥Âà ¤ à ¤Âà ¥Âà ¤°à ¥Âà ¤µà ¥Âà ¤¤ à ¥¥ à ¥©.à ¥§à ¥ª.à ¥§ à ¥¥
sarvaá¹ khalvidaá¹ brahma tajjalÃÂniti à ÂÃÂnta upÃÂsëta | atha khalu kratumayaḥ puruá¹£o yathÃÂkraturasmimÃÂlloke puruá¹£o bhavati tathetaḥ pretya bhavati sa kratuá¹ kurvëta || 3.14.1 ||
1. All this is Brahman. Everything comes from Brahman, everything goes back to Brahman, and everything is sustained by Brahman. One should therefore quietly meditate on Brahman. Each person has a mind of his own. What a person wills in his present life, he becomes when he leaves this world. One should bear this in mind and meditate accordingly.</blockquote>
Sarvam idam, all this; khalu; no doubt; brahma, is Brahman; tajjalÃÂn, from this everything comes, into this everything disappears, and on this everything is sustained; iti à ÂÃÂntaḥ upÃÂsëta, meditate on this fact quietly; atha khalu kratumayaḥ puruá¹£aḥ, because each person has a mind of his own; asmin loke, [therefore] in his present life; yathàkratuḥ puruá¹£aḥ bhavati, just as a person wills; itaḥ pretya tathàbhavati, he becomes that when he leaves this world; saḥ kratum kurvëta, [therefore] he should be careful about what he wants.
The word brahman means âÂÂthe oldest,â âÂÂthe biggest.â Tejas (fire), jala (water), and pá¹Âthivë (earth) emerged from Brahman in that order, so they are called tajja. Then they disappear in Brahman in the reverse order, so they are called talla. In the past, in the present, and in the futureâÂÂthey are sustained in Brahman. They are, therefore, one with Brahman. The Upaniá¹£ad says here to think over this with kratuâÂÂthat is, with great effort, and with deep concentration.
Kratu also means will, or will power. It is your will that decides your destiny. à Ârë Ká¹Âá¹£á¹Âa said to Arjuna (Bhagavad Gëtà8.6): âÂÂO son of Kunti, at the time of death when a person leaves the body, he attains whatever object he thinks of, as he has been [previously] constantly absorbed in its thought.â This shows the importance of your kratu.
Other Mahavakyas are: