Khroskyabs (, previously known as Lavrung, native name in the Wobzi dialect: bósÃÂæi "Tibetan language") is a Gyalrongic language of China. It is called Guanyinqiao in Ethnologue after a town in western Sichuan where one dialect of the language is spoken, Thugsrje Chenbo (). It has been referred to as Lavrung in previous publications.
Speakers are classified as ethnic Tibetans by the Chinese government.
Based on shared phonological and morphological innovations, identifies two major branches of Khroskyabs: Core Khroskyabs dialects and Njorogs (ä¸ÂéÂÂè¯Â). Core-Khroskyabs dialects are further divided into Phosul and Thugschen. The Thugschen dialects include Siyuewu (æÂ¯è·ÂæÂ¦), Wobzi (ä¿ÂçÂÂ), 'Brongrdzong (æÂ¨å°Âå®Â) and Guanyinqiao (è§Âé³桥).
Huang (2007:155) recognizes 3 main dialects of Khroskyabs (, using the term Lavrung Chinese: Lawurong æÂÂÃ¥ÂÂæÂÂ) by a total of about 10,000 people dispersed along the Duke River (æÂÂæÂ¯æ²³) Valley of northwestern Sichuan, just to the west of Barkam Town. The dialects are:
Khroskyabs names and speaker populations for Guanyinqiao dialect locations are (Huang 2007:1-2):
Khroskyabs names and speaker populations for Yelong dialect locations are (Huang 2007:1-2):
The Wobzi dialect has 42 consonantal phonemes, shown in the table below. Other Khroskyabs dialects exhibit similar systems.
Khroskyabs dialects present complex consonant clusters. A consonant cluster in Wobzi is composed of three parts, preinitial(s), initial and medial, which can be tested through a partial reduplication process. 757 consonant clusters are attested according to . A single cluster can contain up to six consonants in a row: ÃÂjnlzdÃÂÃÂ "to be made to buy for one's benefit".
The ordering of preinitials in a consonant cluster follows a language-specific sonority hierarchy :
ÃÂ- > j- > N-, m- > v- > r-, l- > s-, z-
Wobzi Khroskyabs has 9 vowel phonemes, listed in the table below. One diphthong is found, æi. Most Core-Khroskyabs dialects have similar vowel systems. In Phosul, a complete series of velarised vowels are attested : ià, uà, eà, oà, ÃÂà.
Except for conjugated verb forms, Khroskyabs does not allow complex codas. In the Wobzi dialect, complex codas are prohibited even in conjugated verbs. The rhymes attested in Wobzi Khroskyabs are listed in the table below, with forms in conjugated verbs between parentheses.
Two tones are attested in Khroskyabs, a high (H) tone, noted ÃÂÃÂ, and a high-falling (HL) tone, noted ÃÂÃÂ. Some minimal pairs in Wobzi Khroskyabs are illustrated in the table below.
Only one syllable in a phonological word can bear a tone, and the surface tones of the other syllable(s), if existent, are derived from the tone-bearing syllable.
Khroskyabs dialects have two number markers, =ne for dual and =ÃÂi for plural: kÃÂpÃÂÃÂ=ne (book=) "two books", kÃÂpÃÂÃÂ=ÃÂi (book=) "(more than two) books". Like many East Asian languages, number markers are prohibited when a numeral is present:
Khroskyabs presents a rich array of classifiers. A non-exhaustive list of classifiers in the Wobzi dialects is shown below (with the numeral prefix ÃÂÃÂ- "one").
Vocative is formed by assigning a high-falling tone to the penultimate syllable of a noun phrase.
A series of enclitic case markers are attested in Khroskyabs. The Wobzi case markers are listed in the table below.
Khroskyabs possesses a definite article tÃÂ. The article follows the noun it marks as definite, but comes before plural and case markers.
Khroskyabs also has two demonstratives, cÃÂÃÂ(tÃÂ) "this" and æÃÂtà"that". They precede the noun they attach to, and are obligatorily accompanied by the definite article tÃÂ.
In the Wobzi dialect, the obligatory definite article when paired with demonstratives is suppressed in the dual and plural numbers, but in Siyuewu no such suppression occurs.
The Khroskyabs verb exhibits a templatic morphology with a strong prefixing preference, which means every affix is obligatorily positioned in its own slot which is impossible to change. The table below shows the verbal template of Wobzi Khroskyabs .
Prefixes:
Suffixes:
In the following subsections, some characteristics of the affixes are presented.
The superlative prefix sÃÂÃÂ<sub>b</sub>- is compatible with stative verbs and only very few dynamic verbs: sÃÂÃÂ<sub>b</sub>-tsða (<small>SUPERL</small>-be.good<sub>1</sub>) 'best', but *sÃÂÃÂ<sub>b</sub>-và(<small>SUPERL</small>-go<sub>1</sub>).
Negative has four allomorphs. mÃÂ- is used when no other prefix precedes: mÃÂ-tsðâ (<small>NEG<sub>1</sub></small>-be.good) (it is not good); mæ- is used when an orientational prefix precedes: næ-mæ-tsðâ (<small>IPFV.PST</small>-<small>NEG<sub>2</sub></small>-be.good<sub>1</sub>); mÃÂ- is used in perfective or past forms of a verb that prohibits the use of orientational prefixes in such situations: mÃÂ-vdé (<small>NEG<sub>3</sub></small>-see<sub>2</sub>) '(s)he did not see' (vdê 'to see' does not allow any orientational prefix in past form); tÃÂ- is used in irrealis situations, imperative, jussive and conditional with ÃÂÃÂ- (not zÃÂÃÂ-): æ-tÃÂ-dzî-n (<small>IMP</small>-<small>NEG<sub>4</sub></small>-eat<sub>1</sub>-2) 'Don't eat!'; ÃÂÃÂ-tÃÂ-dzi (<small>JUSS</small>-<small>NEG<sub>4</sub></small>-eat<sub>1</sub>) 'Let her/him not eat. '
The interrogative prefixes ÃÂÃÂ- and ÃÂÃÂ- cannot coexist.
The irrealis prefix ÃÂÃÂ- and the conditional prefix zÃÂÃÂ- cannot coexist.
The causative prefix s- in Wobzi Khroskyabs undergoes various morphophonological processes, including voicing assimilation, lateral dissimilation, affrication, metathesis and lateral assimilation.
Autobenefactive N- appears as an archiphoneme having several surface forms according to the phonological environment, especially the place of articulation.
Noun incorporation is attested in Wobzi Khroskyabs as well as other Khroskyabs dialects. The incorporational construction is mainly formed by a nominal part (in its full form or Status Constructus form) and a verbal part. In many cases, a denominal prefix is attached to incorporational forms.
Usually, the nominal part precedes the verbal part, but one example with the verbal part preceding the nominal part is attested:
Khroskyabs dialects distinguish transitive verbs from intransitive verbs unambiguously. Argument indexation presents two patterns, the intransitive pattern and the transitive pattern.
The intransitive paradigm in Wobzi Khroskyabs is illustrated in the table below. There are three suffixes, first person singular -Ã Â, first person non-singular (or plural) -j, and second person -n. Third person is unmarked. The subject argument agrees with verb.
The transitive paradigm exhibits a hierarchical alignment. Khroskyabs has a 1>2>3 empathy hierarchy. In terms of suffixes, within SAP (Speech-act participants, usually first and second persons) arguments, the verb indexes the P (patientive argument), otherwise it indexes the SAP argument, if exists. The inverse prefix u- occurs when the P ranks higher than the A, as well as almost all 3âÂÂ3 scenarios with a TAM prefix on the verb. In all inverse and 3âÂÂ3 scenarios, the ergative marker =ãàmust occur on the A. The transitive paradigm in Wobzi Khroskyabs is shown in the table below.
Below are some examples of the direct configuration:
The inverse configuration:
In 3âÂÂ3 scenarios, if there is a TAM prefix, the inverse marker must occur, otherwise it does not surface.
Argument indexation in Wobzi Khroskyabs is largely simplified compared to other Khroskyabs dialects. Guanyinqiao, Siyuewu and 'Brongrdzong all present the distinction between singular, dual and plural for first and second persons. The Siyuewu transitive paradigm is illustrated below.
Most Khroskyabs verbs present two stems, a few verbs present three stems, and only a handful have only one stem. Roughly speaking, Stem 1 is used in non-past, Stem 2 in past, and Stem 3 in irrealis contexts. If a verb presents only two stems (without Stem 3), the functions of Stem 3 is covered by Stem 1; and if a verb presents only Stem 1, Stem 1 covers the functions of both Stem 2 and Stem 3. Some verbs may only present Stem 2.
In all the Khroskyabs dialects known to us, there are generally 5 strategies of stem alternation: tone alternation (glottal inversion), rime alternation, aspration alternation and suppletion. The following description is mainly based on the Wobzi dialect, if not specifically mentioned differently.
Tone alternation is by far the most common strategy between Stem 1 and Stem 2. For monosyllabic verbs, a simple inversion between the high tone and the high falling tone is observed. If the original tone is high, the Stem 2 will be assigned a falling tone and if the original tone is falling, the Stem 1 will be assigned a high tone.
As for polysyllabic verbs, there are two situations. If the last syllable has a high tone, it will change to a falling tone in Stem 2, otherwise a high tone is assigned to the last syllable in Stem 2.
Rime alternation is also widely attested. Rime alternation is usually combined with tone alternation.
In many cases, only the vowel is changed in Stem 2.
In some other cases, the rime in Stem 2 is changed to -ÃÂã in spite of the original rime.
Some Stem 2 forms present open syllables, while their corresponding Stem 1 forms are closed syllables.
Aspiration alternation is rare. It is only attested in (rÃÂ-)tô 'to come (Stem 1)', whose Stem 2 is (rÃÂ-)tðó.
Suppletion is found in three-stem verbs. These verbs are motion verbs or conveyance verbs. See the table below.
Verb stems usually combine with orientational prefixes to express different properties of tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality. Stem 1 is employed in non-past contexts, Stem 2 in past and perfective contexts and Stem 3 in irrealis contexts.
A verb in Stem 1 can be used without an orientational prefix for a generic fact. It can also combine with the orientational prefix rÃÂ- in a sensory or inferential non-past context.
Stative verbs distinguish past imperfective from perfective, while dynamic verbs present only a general past tense. Stem 2 is required in these situations. Examples of the Stem 2 of the stative verb ndæà'to like' is illustrated below.
Dynamic verbs do not make the distinction between imperfective and perfective, therefore, their meaning in Stem 2 depends on the context.
Denominalisation is mainly through prefixation in Khroskyabs. There are five denominal prefixes attested in Wobzi Khroskyabs, listed in the table below. The prefixes are of limited productivity. The most productive one is n-.
Apart from prefixation, suffixation is also attested. The Wobzi verb mkðÃÂÃÂ-rà"to emit smoke" is based on the noun mkðÃÂà"smoke", suffixed by -rÃÂ. In Siyuewu Khroskyabs which preserves more stop codas, a -d suffix is attested with certain denominalised verbs: rvî "axe" vs. rvæÃÂd "to chop", dzà"food" vs. dzîd "to eat", etc.
Zero derivation is found between verbs and nouns. The form rmê can either be a noun meaning "name", or a verb meaning "to be named". The direction of derivation is unknown.
In a few cases, subtraction can play a role in denominalisation. The noun mbÃÂrlÃÂÃÂn "plane (tool)" is borrowed from Tibetan à ½ à ½Âà ½´à ½¢à ¼Âà ½£à ½ºà ½Âà ¼ bur.len "plane (tool)", and the derived verb form is mbÃÂrlÃÂà"to plane", with the final -n dropped.