The Huainanzi is an ancient philosophical and governmental Chinese text made up of essays from scholarly debates held at the court of Liu An, Prince of Huainan, before 139 BCE. Compiled as a compendium for an enlightened sovereign and his court, the work attempts to define the conditions for a perfect socio-political order, derived mainly from a perfect (or enlightened) ruler. With a notable Zhuangzi 'Taoist' influence, alongside Chinese folk theories of yin and yang and Wu Xing, the Huainanzi draws on Taoist, Legalist, Confucian, and Mohist concepts. But it subverts the latter three in favor of a less active ruler, as prominent in the early Han dynasty before the Emperor Wu.
The early Han authors of the Huainanzi likely preceded Taoist identification, and differ from Taoism as later understood. Later Confucian bibliographers classified it as Zajia or 'Syncretist', but came to often consider it a Taoist classic, at least by extension of its use of Laozi and Zhuangzi. K.C. Hsiao and the work's modern translators considered it a 'principal' example of Han 'Taoism', retrospectively. Sima Tan may have even had the "subversive 'syncretism'" of the Huainanzi in mind when he coined the term Daojia ("Taoism"), claiming to "pick what is good among the Confucians and Mohists". Its ideas theoretically contributed to the founding of the Taoist church in 184 c.e.
The Huainanzi is said to have been compiled by Liu An for presentation to the Emperor Wu of Han. While the modern translators of the Huainanzi did believe it had been compiled by a Liu An, they believed much of it was earlier written during the reign of Wu's father, Emperor Jing of Han.
Debates on organization of the government had already begun under Jing. Liu An himself would have been around during Jing's reign, and the process of debate and organization were not quick; although increasing under Jing, they date back to the founding of the Han dynasty.
More recent scholarship argues that the final chapter of the Huainanzi, Yaolue, was composed after Liu An's death.
Scholars are reasonably certain regarding the date of composition for the Huainanzi. Both the Book of Han and Records of the Grand Historian record that when Liu An paid a state visit to his nephew the Emperor Wu of Han in 139 BC, he presented a copy of his "recently completed" book in twenty-one chapters. Recent research shows that Chapters 1, 2, and 21 of the Huainanzi were performed at the imperial court.
The Huainanzi is an eclectic compilation of chapters or essays that range across topics of religion, history, astronomy, geography, philosophy, science, metaphysics, nature, and politics. It discusses many pre-Han schools of thought, especially the HuangâÂÂLao form of religious Daoism, and contains more than 800 quotations from Chinese classics. The textual diversity is apparent from the chapter titles, listed under the table of contents (tr. Le Blanc, 1985, 15âÂÂ16).
Some passages are philosophically significant, with one example combining Five Phase and Daoist themes. âÂÂ
Anthony C. Yu argued that the Huainanzi can be "unmistakenly denominated" as Taoist in the sense of emphasizing "essential sincerity" as "moving the cosmos", versus Dong Zhongshu's (Confucian) theory of "resonance between heaven and humanity". Recalling the scholarship of Wang Aihe, the two are taken to be rival models for the emperor, who is "no longer a self-evident entity", but rather a "set of complex and dynamic relations" - in practice, positional power relations, contested through a proliferation of cosmological theories and interpretations of omens.
The Huainanzi says that "essential sincerity will be felt within" and cause corresponding movement in the Heavens. While the Huainanzi has heavy Laozi & Zhuangzi influences, Yu admits that such an example of language and terminologies, was "fairly common" across ideologies in the Han dynasty. Language and ritual later taken as Taoist-specific, was more general-milieu than later perceived. It becomes an example of Taoist(-specific) ritual in Tang dynasty poetic fiction, though the association is "interesting to note."
Alongside the Tao Te Ching (Laozi) and Zhuangzi, the Huainanzi includes influences from such works as the Classic of Poetry, Book of Changes, Book of Documents, Han Feizi, Guanzi, Mozi, Lüshi Chunqiu, Chu Ci, and the Classic of Mountains and Seas. Although several of the aforementioned works come to be considered Confucian classics, it is mainly chapter 12 which draws on a combination of Confucian texts, the Lunyu (Analects), Mencius, Xunzi, and Zisizi. Scattered anecdotes are comparable to Mencius, though sometimes differing.
Quantitatively, the Huainanzi's most major influences are the Zhuangzi (269 references) and encyclopedic Lüshi Chunqiu (190), with the Lüshi Chunqiu quoted in twenty of the Huainanzi's twenty one chapters. Most prominently influencing chapters 3-5, much of chapter five quotes directly from the Lushi Chunqiu's first twelve chapters. The Huainanzi's second most major influences are drawn from the Tao Te Ching (99) and Han Feizi (72), or a bit less than half as much, including traces of the Han Feizi's predecessor Shen Buhai.
The first, second and twelfth chapters of the work are based on the Laozi, with Chapter's 2 title "Activating the Genuine" referring to the Dao. But in the evaluation of the Huainanzi's modern translators, the work most strongly resonates with the Zhuangzi. All of Chapter 2's primary themes draw on the Zhuangzi, with one section drawing on such classic Inner Zhuangzi imagery as the "Great Clod" representing Earth and the Dao, and "The Butterfly Dream".
Zhuangzi influences only existed as traces in the earlier, late Warring States period Han Feizi, and the Mawangdui silk texts Huangdi sijing, entombed in the early Han dynasty, still did not associate Laozi and Zhuangzi together. In these terms, the Huainanzi is notable as the main evidence of Zhuangzi influence in the Han dynasty.
The Huainanzi is the first Han dynasty work pairing together the Han Feizi's combination of Shang Yang and Shen Buhai, but disparagingly glosses them together as penal (Shen Buhai issued laws, but was not evidently as penal as Shang Yang). One section briefly re-frames a story from the Han Feizi, adding Laozi, Confucius and Han Fei as characters. Confucius is portrayed as approving Laozi leniency (in the Huainanzi's framing "to attract those who would admonish (the ruler"), while Han Fei decries what he takes to be a failure to punish the officials as abandoning ritual.
If Dong Zhongshu was familiar with the Huainanzi, its "syncretism" would likely have infuriated him, deciding for itself the relation between fundamental Confucian texts and relegating them to one quarter of the "fundamentals of rulership." Though positively receiving earlier reunification of the empire, the Huainanzi opposed a growing expansion of centralized government, with its upcoming class of attending (Confucian) scholar-officials.
Not believing decentralization would win out, the Huainanzi sought to forge a "third way" between centralization and decentralization - with the interest of the local kingdoms in mind. To this end, it places heavenly prognosticators above (Confucian) ritual specialists, and advocates ideas of wuwei nonaction, recommending the ruler put aside trivial matters to follow Fuxi and Nüwa, abiding in Pure Unity as Empty Nothingness. Aiming to demonstrate how every text before it is part of its own integral unity, the Huainanzi posed a threat to the Han court.
Translations that focus on individual chapters include: