() is a gender-neutral personal pronoun in Swedish intended as an alternative to the gender-specific ("she") and ("he"). It can be used when the gender of a person is not known or when it is not desirable to specify them as either a "she" or "he". The word was first proposed in 1966, and again in 1994, with reference to the Finnish , a personal pronoun that is gender-neutral, since Finnish does not have grammatical genders. However, it did not receive widespread recognition until around 2010, when it began to be used in some books, magazines and newspapers, and provoked media debates and controversy over feminism, wokeness, gender neutrality, and parenting. In July 2014, it was announced that would be included in Svenska Akademiens ordlista, the official spelling dictionary of the Swedish Academy. In April 2015, the gender neutral pronoun hen and 13,000 other new words were added in a new official dictionary of the Swedish language. It has been claimed that the word has lost some of its feminist-activist connotation in Sweden as it is used in the media, court rulings and books.
Initially, it was treated as a neologism and faced opposition by some, including the major newspaper that banned it in 2012, but later started using the pronoun. The Swedish Language Council has not issued any proscriptions against the use of , but recommends the inflected forms ("her(s)/his") as the possessive form and the object form ("her/him") over , which also occurs. has two basic usages: as a way to avoid a stated preference to either gender; or as a way of referring to individuals who are agender, genderqueer or non-binary.
The Swedish language has a set of personal pronouns which is more or less identical in form to that of English. The common pronouns used for human beings are either ("he") or ("she"). While Swedish and Danish historically had the same set of three grammatical genders as modern German, with masculine, feminine and neuter, the three-gender system fell out of use from the dialects out of which the respective standard languages were developing sometime in the late Middle Ages. The system contracted so that words of masculine and feminine gender folded into a common gender while the neuter gender remained. In Swedish and Danish, there are two words that would translate to the English pronoun "it": for common gender words and for neuter gender words. Both are gender-neutral in the sense of not referring to male or female, but they are not used to refer to human beings except in specific circumstances.
Attempts to introduce as a gender-neutral pronoun date back to 1966 when linguist Rolf DunÃÂ¥s suggested it in the regional newspaper Upsala Nya Tidning. In 1994, it was again proposed by linguist Hans Karlgren in the national newspaper as a practical alternative to more complicated literary alternatives, noting its similarity to Finnish . In 2008, the feminist cultural magazine Ful became the first periodical to adopt a consistent usage of . By 2009, Nationalencyklopedin, a modern standard Swedish encyclopedia, had created an article about describing it as a "suggested gender-neutral personal pronoun instead of and ".
In January 2012, the children's book ("Kivi and Monster Dog") by Jesper Lundqvist was published. The book consistently used instead of or and sparked a lively media debate. In the February 2012 issue of Nöjesguiden, a Stockholm-based arts and entertainment monthly, was used consistently in all texts with the exception of direct quotes. By late 2012, the word had generated so much publicity that Hufvudstadsbladet, Finland's largest Swedish-language newspaper by circulation, declared that "hen is here to stay".
In November 2012, Swedish linguist Per Ledin made a survey of the use of in a corpus of Swedish blogs. His conclusion was that use among bloggers had been rising steadily from 2009 to 2012 and that it should be considered as an established word. However, accounted for just 0.001% of total usage of personal pronouns.
The airline Norwegian employed the term in an ad campaign in 2012 as a tongue-in-cheek provocation with the slogan "The businesshen's airline". By late 2012, began to see use in official documents in some government agencies. The Court of Appeal for Lower Norrland applied the term in a ruling on official misconduct by a police officer.
appeared in an official political context for the first time in February 2013 when Swedish Minister for Gender Equality Maria Arnholm used it in a debate in the Riksdag, the Swedish parliament. In commenting on the debate afterwards, Arnholm described the word as "a practical way of simplifying" and "a smart way of developing language". By 2013, Boden Municipality had adopted manuals of style to be used by their employees in an official context where was recommended "to avoid repetition of he/she in texts where sex is unclear or where we wish to include both sexes".
By early 2014, had become an established term both in traditional media and among bloggers. The language periodical SprÃÂ¥ktidningen concluded that the instances of usage had gone from one instance for every 13,000 uses of to just under 1 in 300. In late July 2014, the Swedish Academy announced that in April 2015, would be included in Svenska Akademiens ordlista, the most authoritative spelling dictionary on the Swedish language. Its entry will cover two definitions: as a reference to individuals belonging to a specified sex or third gender, or as a reference without specifying sex/gender. In May 2015, was introduced in legal text (the driver's license law), in the self-ruling area ÃÂ land, a part of Finland which is officially Swedish-speaking.
While the Swedish Language Council, the primary regulatory body of the Swedish language, suggests as one of several gender-neutral constructions, the word is not necessarily recommended above the alternatives. Rather, the Council advises the reader to use whichever construction is more contextually apt, considering the target audience. Alternatives to include , equivalent to English it; rewriting as plural, which is ungendered in Swedish much like in English; repeating the noun instead of using a pronoun or using ("he or she"). The council also recommends against using the object form ("her/him") with the reasoning that it is too similar to ("him"), which undermines the gender-neutral intention of the word, and that the case system on which the form is based is a remnant that is no longer used in Swedish; is instead recommended as both the subject and object form (as in ; "I saw him/her") while is the recommended possessive form (i.e. "her(s)/his").
After the use of by the Minister for Gender Equality, and following a meeting of the Speaker of the Riksdag together with party representatives, the Parliament made an official announcement that should not be used in official government documents, but that individual members of parliament are free to use it in spoken debates and written motions. A handful of other authorities, such as the Equality Ombudsman and the National Financial Management Authority, use the pronoun routinely.
From an early stage, has generated controversy and reactions in media. In 2010, the early use of the word prompted reactions of ridicule and skepticism. Columnist Lisa Magnusson taunted it as a "mega-feminist piece of poultry", In early 2012, a series of interviews and articles about the use of in , one of Sweden's leading newspapers, generated widespread debate. Referring to young children as was considered especially controversial, sparking critical reactions from the general public, officials within public daycare and media pundits.
In September 2012, issued a ban on the use of in its articles on the advice of chief editor Gunilla Herlitz. As a reaction to this, journalist and programmer Oivvio Polite created the website dhen.se, a site that mirrored the content of the paper's online edition, but with all instances of and replaced with . An employee at Dagens Nyheter reacted by filing a complaint to the police against dhen.se for violating Swedish copyright law, but later retracted his accusation when the newspaper's management proved unwilling to pursue legal action.
The most controversial aspect of the use of has been vis-à-vis young children, especially in public schools. Egalia, a preschool in Södermalm, an upper middle-class borough in central Stockholm, had been at the forefront of gender-neutral pedagogy, and quickly adopted the use of . This policy sparked debate and controversy in Sweden and received widespread attention in international media in 2011âÂÂ2012.