my-server
← Wiki

Differentiation of integrals

In mathematics, the problem of differentiation of integrals is that of determining under what circumstances the mean value integral of a suitable function on a small neighbourhood of a point approximates the value of the function at that point. More formally, given a space X with a measure μ and a metric d, one asks for what functions f : X Ã¢Â†Â’ R does

for all (or at least μ-almost all) x&nbsp;∈&nbsp;X? (Here, as in the rest of the article, B<sub>r</sub>(x) denotes the open ball in X with d-radius r and centre x.) This is a natural question to ask, especially in view of the heuristic construction of the Riemann integral, in which it is almost implicit that f(x) is a "good representative" for the values of f near x.

Theorems on the differentiation of integrals

Lebesgue measure

One result on the differentiation of integrals is the Lebesgue differentiation theorem, as proved by Henri Lebesgue in 1910. Consider n-dimensional Lebesgue measure λ<sup>n</sup> on n-dimensional Euclidean space R<sup>n</sup>. Then, for any locally integrable function f&nbsp;:&nbsp;R<sup>n</sup>&nbsp;→&nbsp;R, one has

for λ<sup>n</sup>-almost all points x&nbsp;∈&nbsp;R<sup>n</sup>. It is important to note, however, that the measure zero set of "bad" points depends on the function f.

Borel measures on R<sup>n</sup>

The result for Lebesgue measure turns out to be a special case of the following result, which is based on the Besicovitch covering theorem: if μ is any locally finite Borel measure on R<sup>n</sup> and f&nbsp;:&nbsp;R<sup>n</sup>&nbsp;→&nbsp;R is locally integrable with respect to μ, then

for μ-almost all points x&nbsp;∈&nbsp;R<sup>n</sup>.

Gaussian measures

The problem of the differentiation of integrals is much harder in an infinite-dimensional setting. Consider a separable Hilbert space (H,&nbsp;⟨&nbsp;,&nbsp;⟩) equipped with a Gaussian measure γ. As stated in the article on the Vitali covering theorem, the Vitali covering theorem fails for Gaussian measures on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Two results of David Preiss (1981 and 1983) show the kind of difficulties that one can expect to encounter in this setting:

  • There is a Gaussian measure γ on a separable Hilbert space H and a Borel set M&nbsp;⊆&nbsp;H so that, for γ-almost all x&nbsp;∈&nbsp;H,
  • There is a Gaussian measure γ on a separable Hilbert space H and a function f&nbsp;∈&nbsp;L<sup>1</sup>(H,&nbsp;γ;&nbsp;R) such that

However, there is some hope if one has good control over the covariance of γ. Let the covariance operator of γ be S&nbsp;:&nbsp;H&nbsp;→&nbsp;H given by

or, for some countable orthonormal basis (e<sub>i</sub>)<sub>i∈N</sub> of H,

In 1981, Preiss and Jaroslav Tišer showed that if there exists a constant 0&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;q&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;1 such that

then, for all f&nbsp;∈&nbsp;L<sup>1</sup>(H,&nbsp;γ;&nbsp;R),

where the convergence is convergence in measure with respect to γ. In 1988, Tišer showed that if

for some α&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;5&nbsp;⁄&nbsp;2, then

for γ-almost all x and all f&nbsp;∈&nbsp;L<sup>p</sup>(H,&nbsp;γ;&nbsp;R), p&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;1.

As of 2007, it is still an open question whether there exists an infinite-dimensional Gaussian measure γ on a separable Hilbert space H so that, for all f&nbsp;∈&nbsp;L<sup>1</sup>(H,&nbsp;γ;&nbsp;R),

for γ-almost all x&nbsp;∈&nbsp;H. However, it is conjectured that no such measure exists, since the σ<sub>i</sub> would have to decay very rapidly.

See also

References