Deborah Esther Lipstadt (born March 18, 1947) is an American historian and diplomat, best known as author of the books Denying the Holocaust (1993), History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier (2005), The Eichmann Trial (2011), and ' (2019). She served as the United States special envoy for monitoring and combating anti-semitism from 2022 to 2025. Since 1993 she has been the Dorot Professor of Modern Jewish History and Holocaust Studies at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.
Lipstadt was a consultant to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. In 1994, President Bill Clinton appointed her to the United States Holocaust Memorial Council, and she served two terms. On July 30, 2021, President Joe Biden nominated her to be the special envoy for monitoring and combating anti-semitism. She was confirmed by voice-vote on March 30, 2022, and sworn in on May 3, 2022. She served in that position until January 2025. Lipstadt was named one of the 100 most influential people in the world by Time magazine in 2023.
Lipstadt was born in New York City to a Jewish family, the daughter of Miriam (née Peiman) and Erwin Lipstadt. Her mother was born in Canada, and her father, a salesman, was born in Germany. Her parents met at their neighborhood synagogue. She has an older sister, Helene, a historian, and a younger brother, Nathaniel, an investor on Wall Street.
In her youth, she studied at the Hebrew Institute of Long Island, and grew up in Far Rockaway, Queens. She studied with Rabbi Emanuel Rackman at Temple Shaarei Tefillah. Lipstadt spent summers at Camp Massad.
She spent her junior year of college â which turned out to include the Six-Day War â in Israel, where she stayed as an exchange student at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. She completed a Bachelor of Arts in American history at the City College of New York in 1969. She then enrolled at Brandeis University where she completed her master's degree in 1972 and then her Ph.D. in Near Eastern and Judaic Studies in 1976. Her doctoral dissertation was entitled "The Zionist Career of Louis Lipsky, 1900âÂÂ1921".
After receiving her Ph.D., Lipstadt began teaching, first at the University of Washington in Seattle from 1974 to 1979, then as an assistant professor at UCLA. When she was denied tenure there, she left in 1985 to be the director of the independent Brandeis-Bardin Institute for two years, during which time she also wrote a monthly column for The Jewish Spectator. Lipstadt then received a research fellowship from the Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism at Hebrew University of Jerusalem, during which she studied Holocaust denial, and taught at Occidental College part time.
Lipstadt then became an assistant professor of religion at Emory University in Atlanta in January 1993, becoming the Dorot Professor of Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies that fall. She helped to create the Tam Institute for Jewish Studies there. She considered teaching as a visiting professor at Columbia University but didn't take the post as she felt at risk and Columbia would use her as a sop to show it was fighting antisemitism when that was not true.
In May 2021, Lipstadt was considered for an ambassadorship position at the Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism in the Biden administration.
On July 30, 2021, President Joe Biden nominated Lipstadt for this role. Opposition from Senator Ron Johnson, whom she had tweeted was advocating "white supremacy/nationalism," delayed her nomination for many months. Her initial nomination expired at the end of the year and was returned to President Biden on January 3, 2022.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held hearings on her nomination on February 8, 2022. On March 29, 2022, the committee favorably reported her nomination out of committee. Her nomination was supported by all committee Democrats, as well as senators Mitt Romney and Marco Rubio. It was confirmed by voice vote on March 30, 2022, and she was sworn in on May 3, 2022.
Lipstadt was part of the Biden administration team that launched the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023.
On October 17, 2023, in a joint statement with Michal Cotler-Wunsh (Israel's antisemitism envoy), published by the U.S. State Department, Lipstadt condemned the October 7 attacks.
In September 2024, Lipstadt attended the Jewish New Year ceremony at the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. with Israeli Ambassador Michael Herzog, Zioness founder Amanda Berman, and cybertechnology official Anne Neuberger.
Lipstadt is noted for being among the commentators who imply that antisemitism is an eternal phenomenon. She once likened antisemitism to "a virus without a cure," which researcher Steven Beller criticized as inaccurate and absolving antisemites of responsibility. Although Lipstadt often distinguished between "legitimate criticism of Israel," and criticism that "crossed the line" into antisemitism, she did not specify where she considered that line to be, specifically whether other democratic visions than the two-state solution were antisemitic.
On September 5, 1996, author David Irving sued Lipstadt and her publisher Penguin Books for libel in an English court for characterizing some of his writings and public statements as Holocaust denial in her book '.
Lipstadt's legal defense team was led by Anthony Julius of Mishcon de Reya while Penguin's was led by Kevin Bays and Mark Bateman of Davenport Lyons. Both defendants instructed Richard Rampton QC, while Penguin also instructed Heather Rogers as junior counsel. The expert witnesses for the defence included Cambridge historian Richard J. Evans, Christopher Browning, Robert Jan van Pelt, and Peter Longerich.
English libel law places the burden of proof on the defendant rather than the plaintiff. using the justification defense, namely by demonstrating in court that Lipstadt's accusations against Irving were substantially true and therefore not libelous. The case was argued as a bench trial before Mr Justice Gray, who produced a written judgment 349 pages long detailing Irving's systematic distortion of the historical record of World War II. The Times (April 14, 2000, p. 23) said of Lipstadt's victory, "History has had its day in court and scored a crushing victory."
Despite her acrimonious history with Irving, Lipstadt has stated that she is personally opposed to the three-year prison sentence Austria imposed on Irving for two speeches he made in 1989, where he claimed there had been no gas chambers at Auschwitz. In Austria, minimizing the atrocities of the Third Reich is a crime punishable with up to ten years' imprisonment. Speaking of Irving, Lipstadt said, "I am uncomfortable with imprisoning people for speech. Let him go and let him fade from everyone's radar screens ... Generally, I don't think Holocaust denial should be a crime. I am a free speech person, I am against censorship."
In February 2007, Lipstadt warned of "soft-core denial" at the Zionist Federation's annual fundraising dinner in London. Referring to groups such as the Muslim Council of Britain, reportedly she stated: "When groups of people refuse to commemorate Holocaust Memorial Day unless equal time is given to anti-Muslim prejudice, this is soft-core denial." According to Jonny Paul, "She received huge applause when she asked how former United States President Jimmy Carter could omit the years 1939âÂÂ1947 from a chronology in his book"; referring to his recently published and controversial book ', she said: "When a former president of the United States writes a book on the IsraeliâÂÂPalestinian crisis and writes a chronology at the beginning of the book in order to help them understand the emergence of the situation and in that chronology lists nothing of importance between 1939 and 1947, that is soft-core denial."
Along the same lines, Lipstadt has criticized the German philosopher and historian Ernst Nolte for engaging in what she calls "soft-core denial" of the Holocaust, arguing that Nolte practices an even more dangerous form of negationism than the Holocaust deniers. Speaking of Nolte in a 2003 interview, Lipstadt stated:
In late 2011, Lipstadt attacked American and Israeli politicians for what she called their invocation of the Holocaust for contemporary political purposes, something she thought mangled history. She rebuked Republican Party presidential candidates for speeches that 'pandered' to the Evangelical constituency, as much as it did to the Republican Jewish Coalition. She also judged Howard Gutman's remarks on causal links between Muslim antisemitism and the IsraeliâÂÂPalestinian conflict as "stupid". According to Haaretz, "She decried the 'hysteria' and 'neuroses' of many Jews and Israelis who compare the current situation in Europe and in the Middle East to the Holocaust-era":
In the same interview, she argued that "If anti-Semitism becomes the reason through which your Jewish view of the world is refracted, if it becomes your prism, then it is very unhealthy. Jewish tradition never wanted that." She said "You listen to Newt Gingrich talking about the Palestinians as an 'invented people'âÂÂit's out-Aipacking AIPAC, it's out-Israeling Israel". On a visit to London in September 2014, Lipstadt criticized the Israeli government and said that the government had "cheapened" the memory of the Holocaust by using it to justify war. She has also rejected the view that Israeli military actions during the 2014 IsraelâÂÂGaza conflict constituted a genocide.
Lipstadt returned to the theme of soft-core Holocaust denial in The Atlantic when responding to the Trump administration's statement on International Holocaust Remembrance Day, January 27, 2017, which was condemned for the absence of a specific mention of Jews, as the principal victims of the Holocaust or of antisemitism itself. "The Holocaust was de-Judaized. It is possible that it all began with a mistake. Someone simply did not realize what they were doing. It is also possible that someone did this deliberately."
In February 2019, Lipstadt resigned her membership in the Young Israel synagogue movement because its national council president defended Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's facilitation of a merger between the Bayit Yehudi party and the extremist Otzma Yehudit party.
In October 2019, Lipstadt had a letter to the editor published in The New York Times, prompted by the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Literature to Peter Handke, in which she wrote that the Nobel Committee awarded Handke a platform "he does not deserve" and that "the public does not need him to have", adding that such a platform could convince some that his "false claims must have some legitimacy".
In 2020, LipstadtâÂÂs interview in âÂÂâÂÂConfronting Holocaust DenialâÂÂâ with David Baddiel focuses on her landmark legal battle against Holocaust denier David Irving and the broader question of whether deniers should ever be given a public platform. In the documentary, Lipstadt discusses the emotional and intellectual toll of the trial, the strategies used by deniers to distort historical fact, and the importance of confronting falsehoods directly rather than allowing them to circulate unchallenged. Her conversation with Baddiel underscores the documentaryâÂÂs central theme: that rigorous historical scholarship and survivor testimony remain essential tools in countering denialism.
In September 2024, she came under criticism by CAIR over a joke made about the 2024 Lebanon pager explosions.
In January 2025, Lipstadt said in Brussels: "We are at an inflection point. Antisemitism is becoming increasingly normalized...[antisemitic comments] are freely heard on streets of some of our leading Western democracies in many countries, including this country." In April, Lipstadt disagreed with the characterisation of the activists deported under the second Trump presidency as 'martyrs and heroes'. In a later interview with Isaac Chotiner, she blamed universities for "opening the door" to the Trump administration's deportation campaign.
In January 2026, Lipstadt asserted that an arson attack on the Beth Israel Congregation in Jackson, Mississippi was "another step in the globalization of the intifada." She walked back her comment after the arsonist was revealed to have been motivated by far-right antisemitism and not the pro-Palestinian movement.
After the publication of Denying the Holocaust in June 1993, Lipstadt received the 1994 National Jewish Book Award. Already a consultant to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, President Bill Clinton appointed her in 1994 to the United States Holocaust Memorial Council. In 1997, Lipstadt received the Emory Williams teaching award for excellence in teaching. She is also a recipient of the Albert D. Chernin Award from the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, which is given to "an American Jew whose work best exemplifies the social justice imperatives of Judaism, Jewish history and the protection of the Bill of Rights, particularly the First Amendment." Previous recipients of the Award include Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Alan Dershowitz. Lipstadt was awarded the 2005 National Jewish Book Award in the Holocaust category for History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier and the 2019 National Jewish Book Award in Education and Jewish Identity for Antisemitism: Here and Now.
Lipstadt has received honorary doctorates from a number of institutions, including Ohio Wesleyan University, John Jay College of Criminal Justice of the City University of New York, Yeshiva University, and the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, among others.
In March 2026, Lipstadt faced criticism after a video circulated online in which she referenced the Jewish Torah reading âÂÂâÂÂParshat ZachorâÂÂâÂÂ. In the clip, Lipstadt stated:
<blockquote> âÂÂThose of us who were in synagogue yesterday heard Parshat Zachor, a very brief reading from Deuteronomy about Amalek, what Amalek did to you. What are we told to do? DonâÂÂt forget⦠remember⦠and wipe them out!â </blockquote>
The remarks referenced a passage in the Book of Deuteronomy (Deuteronomy 25:17âÂÂ19) concerning Amalek, an ancient biblical enemy of the Israelites. Critics argued that the language of âÂÂwipe them outâ echoed genocidal rhetoric and was particularly inflammatory given the context of the ongoing IsraelâÂÂHamas war. The clip spread widely on social media and prompted accusations that Lipstadt was invoking religious texts to justify violence against modern adversaries.
Supporters responded that Lipstadt was quoting or paraphrasing a traditional synagogue reading associated with âÂÂâÂÂParshat ZachorâÂÂâÂÂ, which is recited annually before the Jewish festival of Purim, and argued that the remarks were taken out of context. The incident fueled debate about the use of biblical language in contemporary political discourse.
Lipstadt's comments regarding the role of Poles during the Holocaust have generated debate among historians and public officials. In interviews and public remarks, Lipstadt has stated that while many Poles helped Jews during the German occupation of Poland, others collaborated in the persecution of Jews, including by denouncing or attacking them. In one interview she claimed that âÂÂfar moreâ Poles harmed Jews than helped them, a statement that drew criticism from some scholars and commentators.
Critics, including several historians of Poland and World War II, have argued that such remarks risk implying collective Polish complicity in the Holocaust and do not adequately reflect the historical circumstances of Nazi-occupied Poland. They note that Poland was occupied by Nazi Germany rather than governed by a collaborationist regime, and emphasize that millions of ethnic Poles were themselves victims of Nazi rule. Some scholars have also argued that generalizations about Polish behavior during the occupation can obscure the wide range of responses among the population, which included rescue, indifference, denunciation, and violence.
Lipstadt has been a prominent supporter of the controversial IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism. During her tenure as the United States Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, she promoted the definition as a tool for identifying and responding to antisemitism in government and civil society.
The definition has been the subject of debate among scholars and free speech advocates. Some academics and civil liberties organizations have argued that aspects of the definition and its accompanying examples could be used to discourage or restrict criticism of Israel in academic or political contexts. Supporters of the definition, including Lipstadt, have rejected this interpretation and argue that it does not prohibit criticism of Israeli government policies but provides guidance for recognizing contemporary forms of antisemitism. Critics have argued, however, that the distinction between antisemitism and criticism of Israel can be difficult to apply in practice, and that the definition's examples relating to Israel may create a chilling effect on academic or political speech about Israeli policies.