On 11 March 2006, former Yugoslav president Slobodan Miloà ¡eviàdied in his prison cell of a heart attack at age 64 while being tried for war crimes at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague. Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's four-year trial had been a major international news story, and he died a few months before its verdict was due. His death occurred shortly after the Tribunal rejected his request to seek specialized medical treatment at a cardiology clinic in Moscow. A report published on 30 May 2006 confirmed that he had died of natural causes and that there was "no poison or other chemical substance found in his body that contributed to the death".
Miloà ¡eviàwas found dead in his cell on 11 March 2006 in the UN war crimes tribunal's detention centre in the Scheveningen section of The Hague. An official in the chief prosecutor's office said that Miloà ¡eviàhad been found at about 10 a.m. and had apparently been dead for several hours. His trial had been due to resume on 14 March with testimony from the former president of Montenegro, Momir BulatoviÃÂ. A request for the autopsy in the presence of a Serbian pathologist was granted, and his body was transported to the Dutch Forensic Institute.
It was established that Miloà ¡eviàdied of a heart attack. Suspicions have been voiced:
Miloà ¡eviàhad been suffering from heart problems and high blood pressure. Initially, the Dutch coroner failed to establish the cause of his death. Consequently, the president of the ICTY ordered an autopsy and a toxicological investigation. Immediately after his death was announced, rumours that Miloà ¡eviàhad been poisoned started circulating.
An autopsy was held in the Netherlands; its preliminary results found that Miloà ¡eviàhad died of myocardial infarction, the medical term for a heart attack. The Tribunal warned that it was impossible to rule out poisoning at the time of their statement, as the toxicological tests had not been completed. The Tribunal had denied Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's request for travel to Russia for specialist medical treatment. He planned to appeal this decision, saying that his condition was worsening. Shortly before his death, Miloà ¡eviàcomplained about wrong medical treatment to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. The Russian Foreign Ministry confirmed that it received the letter from Miloà ¡eviàwith his medical complaints. In the letter as provided by Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's lawyer Zdenko TomanoviÃÂ, Miloà ¡eviàcomplained that he was being given a drug used against tuberculosis and leprosy, and that it was done in secrecy and without him (Miloà ¡eviÃÂ) knowing anything about it. In his hand written letter to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Miloà ¡eviàsaid he never used any drugs on his own, nor was he ill and in need of medicine:
Miloà ¡eviàcomplained, in the same letter, that even though the medical report containing information that the drug used to treat leprosy was found in his blood dated from 12 January, he had only found out and received the report four days earlier. The same was reported later by former pro-Miloà ¡eviàMontenegrin President Momir BulatoviÃÂ, who was due to testify for Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's defence. According to BulatoviÃÂ, Miloà ¡eviàhad stopped taking the drug and consequently was afraid of being poisoned. In his letter, Miloà ¡eviàmotivated his desire to be treated in Russia (by "Russian physicians, who rank among the most respected physicians in the world"), saying that:
Lawyer Zdenko Tomanoviàtold reporters that his client had feared Miloà ¡eviàwas being poisoned and cited the aforementioned letter, as well as the medical report two months before his death, according to which Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's blood contained rifampicin - a drug that is normally used to treat leprosy and tuberculosis and which would have neutralized some of the effects of Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's medicines for his high blood pressure and heart condition. Tomanoviàsaid he had made a formal request for the autopsy to take place in Moscow. The Tribunal rejected the request, allowing instead a pathologist from Serbia to attend the autopsy. In his statement, Tomanoviàsaid: "I demanded protection for Slobodan Miloà ¡eviàover his claims that he was being poisoned. I still haven't received any reply and that's all I have to say at this time."
Dutch toxicologist Donald Uges confirmed that the drug had been found in Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's blood and suggested that he may have deliberately taken these drugs in order to get out of jail and seek medical treatment in Russia, where Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's widow, Mirjana MarkoviÃÂ, and son, Marko, were still living in exile. Likewise, sources at the Tribunal stated that Miloà ¡eviàhad regular access to unprescribed drugs that were smuggled into his cell under a lax prison regime. Timothy McFadden, the prison governor responsible for Miloà ¡eviÃÂ, is reported to have complained, in vain, in December and January that he could no longer monitor drugs taken by the former leader. Miloà ¡eviàhas the key to his own office, which had a fax machine, a computer and a telephone, and access to a private "comfort room" for visits by his wife.
The Tribunal confirmed that preliminary results of blood tests shows there is no indication that Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's death by heart attack was caused by poisoning. Judge Fausto Pocar, president of the UN war crimes tribunal, told a news conference: "So far no indications of poisoning have been found. I would like to stress that these are provisional results." Tribunal registrar Hans Holthuis confirmed that traces of rifampicin were found in an earlier 12 January blood test. However, Pocar said that there are no traces of the drug were found at the time of Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's death. According to The Hague, district public prosecutor Moraal, referring to the NFI/Dutch Forensic Institute, "rifampicin disappears from the body quickly, and the fact that no traces were found implies only that it is not likely that rifampicin had been ingested or administered in the last few days before death".
Leo Bokeria, Director of Moscow's Bakulev Heart Surgery Center, confirmed that Miloà ¡eviàhad died of a heart attack, but said adequate treatment in Moscow or in any one of many countries, including the Netherlands, would have rescued him. According to Bokeria, the necessary medical procedures (coronary angiography and stenting) were "elementary". Bokeria said he saw "nothing showing signs of suicide", but there remained questions over whether Miloà ¡eviàreceived adequate care while standing trial at the U.N. tribunal.
Bokeria also claimed that the center had sent Pocar a letter informing him that Miloà ¡eviàneeded hospital treatment and naming several countries beside Russia where that could be done. The Times medical columnist Thomas Stuttaford commented that, taking into account what had been known about Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's health condition for years, he was "surprised that he (Miloà ¡eviÃÂ) lived for as long as he did". According to Stuttaford, given the data that existed, Miloà ¡eviàshould have been considered for a coronary bypass or angioplasty; while these operations might be rendered impossible by severe heart defects, that can only be established by a careful analysis of the heart, and one would have thought that if this had been done, someone would have mentioned it. According to Stuttaford, using rifampicin might have been a cunning way to kill a man that needs no expertise.
The conclusions of the Dutch investigation into Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's death were finally announced. Investigators concluded that Miloà ¡eviàhad died of natural causes, and final toxicological studies had confirmed there were no traces of poisoning or substances which could have triggered the heart attack. Tribunal prosecutors also announced that although non-prescribed medicines had been found in Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's cell three months earlier, no such medicines were found in his cell on the day he died. The president of the UN Yugoslav war crimes tribunal welcomed the final report that formally closed the Dutch investigation, but he said that the Tribunal will continue to investigate the medical treatment Miloà ¡eviàhad received during his five-year detention.
ICTY Chief Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte deplored Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's death, saying that it had "deprived victims of justice". Concerning the causes of Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's death, she concluded that suicide could not be ruled out and declined to comment on speculation that Miloà ¡eviàmay have been poisoned. In an interview with the Rome newspaper, La Repubblica, Del Ponte stated:
In Serbia, tens of thousands of Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's supporters criticized the Tribunal for allegedly being more or less responsible for his death. Members of his Socialist Party advisors were particularly harsh - for example, senior official Ivica DaÃÂiàsaid that "Miloà ¡eviàdid not die in The Hague, he was killed in The Hague". President Boris TadiÃÂ, who was an opponent of Miloà ¡eviàand the Socialist Party, said that in his opinion the U.N. war crimes tribunal was responsible for Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's death, but he added that it would not hamper Serbia's future cooperation with the court.
Most notable was a letter Marko Miloà ¡eviÃÂ, son of Slobodan Miloà ¡eviÃÂ, sent to The President of the ICTY, The Chairman of the Security Council of the OUN, The Secretary General of the OUN, and to Judge Parker who led the investigation into Slobodan Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's death. In his letter, Marko Miloà ¡eviàaccuses the Hague Tribunal for negligence and for the death of his father. In one part of the letter, Miloà ¡eviàagrees that his father was not poisoned and accuses the ICTY for being misleading:
Marko Miloà ¡eviàthen continues about the logic of the investigation into his father's death:
The Miloà ¡eviàfamily raised questions about the legitimacy of the ICTY conducted investigation:
Marko Miloà ¡eviàthen concludes that the ICTY is playing on "straw man" policy:
Marko Miloà ¡eviàdoubted the intentions of the ICTY:
As (one of the) conclusion(s), Marko Miloà ¡eviàoffers:
There was a strong controversy across Serbia regarding Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's funeral, as the Socialist Party and nationalist leaders demanded that it should be state-sponsored and high-profile. In particular, it was argued that Miloà ¡eviàought to have a prominent resting place in the "Alley of the Greats," where other Serbian leaders are buried, which the Tribunal rejected. As a result, the Socialist Party threatened to withdraw its support, which was essential for the ruling coalition. Finally, the Tribunal decided that Miloà ¡eviàshould have a private burial in his hometown, Poà ¾arevac. Nevertheless, a farewell ceremony was organised by the Socialist Party outside the federal parliament in Belgrade. About 50,000 of Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's supporters attended the ceremony, which turned into a mass demonstration, with a succession of fiery speeches by prominent supporters. Afterwards, Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's coffin was taken to his hometown for burial in the backyard of his family home. Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's family and close friends pulled out of his funeral, citing anonymous threats and contradictory statements from Serbian authorities regarding the requested guarantees that they would not be arrested. Miloà ¡eviÃÂ's daughter Marija stated that the Socialist Party had hijacked the funeral for political ends.