Amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and fractional ALFF (fALFF) are resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) metrics that quantify the power of spontaneous, low-frequency (~0.01âÂÂ0.10 Hz) fluctuations of the BOLD signal within a voxel or region of interest. ALFF measures the square root of the power spectrum within a predefined low-frequency band (commonly 0.01âÂÂ0.08 or 0.01âÂÂ0.10 Hz). The exact upper cutoff depends on the sampling rate (repetition time, TR) and must be below the Nyquist frequency (1/(2÷TR)). fALFF is the ratio of power within that low-frequency band to the total power across a broader band (often 0âÂÂ0.25 Hz), which reduces nonspecific physiological noise relative to ALFF.
Electrophysiological studies suggest that low-frequency BOLD oscillations partly reflect spontaneous neuronal activity: simultaneous EEGâÂÂfMRI demonstrates that canonical resting-state networks exhibit distinct electrophysiological signatures whose power covaries with BOLD fluctuations. Early rs-fMRI work also showed that frequencies below ~0.1 Hz dominate functional connectivity patterns.
The ALFF metric was popularized in early rs-fMRI studies in the midâÂÂ2000s and applied to clinical populations. A widely cited report applied ALFF to children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), describing regional increases and decreases relative to typically developing peers. The fALFF variant was introduced to improve specificity to gray-matter neuronal fluctuations by normalizing low-frequency power to the whole-band power.
ALFF and fALFF are typically computed as follows: (1) preprocess rs-fMRI time series (slice timing correction, realignment, nuisance regression, spatial normalization, andâÂÂoptionallyâÂÂtemporal filtering); (2) transform each voxel's time series to the frequency domain with a FFT and obtain the power spectrum; (3) define a low-frequency band (commonly 0.01âÂÂ0.08 or 0.01âÂÂ0.10 Hz, constrained by the Nyquist frequency 1/(2÷TR)) and compute ALFF as the square root of the average power within that band; and (4) compute fALFF as the ratio of power in the low-frequency band to the power across a broader band (e.g., up to the Nyquist frequency set by TR; often 0âÂÂ0.25 Hz for TRâÂÂ2 s).
Some studies partition the spectrum into subâÂÂbandsâÂÂcommonly slowâÂÂ5 (0.01âÂÂ0.027 Hz) and slowâÂÂ4 (0.027âÂÂ0.073 Hz)âÂÂto probe frequencyâÂÂspecific effects; frequencyâÂÂdependent differences in ALFF/fALFF topography are robust across datasets.
Low-frequency BOLD power is influenced by neuronal and nonâÂÂneuronal factors. NonâÂÂneuronal contributors include cardiac and respiratory cycles and cerebrospinal fluid pulsations, which can contaminate signals near large vessels and ventricles. fALFF reduces some of this sensitivity by normalizing lowâÂÂfrequency power to total power, though it does not fully remove physiological noise.
WholeâÂÂbrain ALFF/fALFF maps show relatively high values in regions associated with the default mode network (DMN), including the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, medial prefrontal cortex, and bilateral inferior parietal lobule, consistent with the prominence of lowâÂÂfrequency activity in these areas.
ALFF and fALFF are descriptive markers used in caseâÂÂcontrol comparisons and biomarker discovery across many conditions. Examples include:
ReHo measures the similarity (Kendall's coefficient of concordance) of a voxel's time series with its neighbors, indexing local synchrony rather than amplitude. It is often complementary to ALFF/fALFF in mapping local coherence versus power.
PerAF expresses the average absolute BOLD fluctuation at each voxel as a percentage of its mean signal across time. Unlike ALFF/fALFF, which are bandâÂÂlimited spectral measures, PerAF is a timeâÂÂdomain, scaleâÂÂindependent metric analogous to percent signal change in task fMRI.
ALFF/fALFF are sensitive to preprocessing choices (e.g., filtering, motion regression), physiological noise, and scanner/sequence parameters. Interpretability at the singleâÂÂsubject level is limited; these metrics are most reliable for groupâÂÂlevel comparisons.