Al-Jami' as-Saghir (, ') is a Sunni hadith collection authored by the Islamic scholar JalÃÂl al-Dën al-Suyà «á¹Âë (1445 â 1505 CE/ 849 - 911 H).
Al-Suyà «á¹Âë began compiling seventy-one hadith collections into one grand work titled Jamÿ al-JawÃÂmi, but he did not live long enough to complete it. Al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër is, in a sense, an abridgment of this unfinished monumental work. The author completed it on 28 Rabëÿ al-Awwal 907 (October 11, 1501), and named it al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër min ḥadëth al-bashër al-nadhër. The work is arranged alphabetically, with hadiths generally ordered according to the first two letters of the opening word, andâÂÂby the nature of the method followedâÂÂchains of transmission (isnÃÂds) are omitted. Although the book contains mostly sayings (qawlë ḥadëths), a small section is also devoted to actions (fiÿlë ḥadëths). In the section devoted to the prohibitions of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, hadiths beginning with the verb âÂÂnahÃÂâ (âÂÂhe forbadeâÂÂ) are presented.
As-Saghir is a non-primary hadith work which contains 10,031 hadith. Al-Suyuti extracted all of the hadiths related to Muhammad's speech contrary to Muhammad's actions and compiled them in his smaller collection entitling it Jami al-Saghir.
The collection mainly consists of short hadiths, often one or a few sentences in length, and deals primarily with topics such as creed (ÿaqëdah), etiquette and manners (Adab), medicine, encouragement and warning (targhëb wa tarhëb), knowledge, supplication and remembrance (dua and dhikr), repentance (tawba) and forgiveness (istighfar), and the Prophet's character and virtues (shamÃÂþil and faá¸ÂÃÂþil). Legal (aḥkÃÂm) hadiths are almost absent. The transmitters of the hadiths and the sources where they appear are indicated by symbols (rumà «z) placed at the end of each hadith.
The main sources of the work are: the Kutub al-Sittah, Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal's Musnad, his son ÿAbd AllÃÂh's ZawÃÂþid upon the Musnad, al-ḤÃÂkim al-NësÃÂbà «rë's al-Mustadrak, al-BukhÃÂrë's al-Adab al-Mufrad and al-TÃÂrëkh al-Kabër, Ibn ḤibbÃÂn's á¹¢aḥëḥ, al-ṬabarÃÂnë's three Muÿjams, Saÿëd b. Maná¹£à «r's Sunan, the Muá¹£annafs of Ibn Abë Shaybah, the Muá¹£annafs of ÿAbd al-RazzÃÂq, Abà « Yaÿlàal-Mawá¹£ilë's al-Musnad al-Kabër, al-DÃÂraquá¹Ânë's Sunan, al-Daylamë's Musnad al-Firdaws, Abà « Nuÿaym's Ḥilyat al-AwliyÃÂþ, Abà « Bakr al-Bayhaqë's al-Sunan al-Kubràand Shuÿab al-êmÃÂn, Ibn ÿAdë's al-KÃÂmil, al-ÿUqaylë's al-á¸ÂuÿafÃÂþ, al-Khaá¹Âëb al-BaghdÃÂdë's TÃÂrëkh BaghdÃÂd, Aḥmad b. ÿAlë al-Mawhibë's KitÃÂb al-ÿIlm, Abà « Mà «sàal-Madënë's KitÃÂb al-Dhayl, Abà «âÂÂl-Faraj Ibn al-Jawzë''s al-ÿIlal al-MutanÃÂhiya, al-QarrÃÂb's KitÃÂb Faá¸Âl al-Ramë, al-Mustaáfirë's KitÃÂb al-Ṭibb, and Ibn ÿAbd al-Barr al-Namarë's JÃÂmiÿ BayÃÂn al-ÿIlm. Al-Suyà «á¹Âë used symbols for works he benefited from most, while he wrote out the titles of those he used less frequently.
Al-Suyà «á¹Âë states that he did not include any hadiths transmitted by narrators known to have fabricated hadiths or accused of lying, and that he devised his own method to indicate the strength of each hadith. According to him, all hadiths taken from al-BukhÃÂrë, Muslim, Ibn ḤibbÃÂn, al-ḤÃÂkim, and á¸ÂiyÃÂþ al-Dën al-Maqdisë are considered á¹£aḥëḥ. If any of the hadiths taken from al-Mustadrak have been criticized, he notes them explicitly. He also regards as á¹£aḥëḥ the narrations he transmits from ImÃÂm MÃÂlik's al-Muwaá¹Âá¹Âaþ, Ibn Khuzaymah's á¹¢aḥëḥ, Abà « ÿAwÃÂnah al-WÃÂsiá¹Âë's al-Musnad al-Mukharraj, Ibn al-Sakan's á¹¢aḥëḥ, Ibn al-JÃÂrà «d's al-MuntaqÃÂ, and the hadiths included by Abà « DÃÂwà «d in his Sunan without any criticism.
By contrast, since the works of al-Tirmidhë, Ibn MÃÂjah, Abà « DÃÂwà «d al-ṬayÃÂlisë, Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal, ÿAbd al-RazzÃÂq, Saÿëd b. Maná¹£à «r, Ibn Abë Shaybah, Abà « Yaÿlàal-Mawá¹£ilë, al-ṬabarÃÂnë's al-Muÿjam al-Kabër and al-Muÿjam al-Awsaá¹Â, al-DÃÂraquá¹Ânë, Abà « Nuÿaym, and al-Bayhaqë contain both á¹£aḥëḥ, ḥasan, and á¸Âaÿëf narrations, he indicates the status of each hadith taken from these sources individually. Hadiths drawn from al-ÿUqaylë, Ibn ÿAdë, al-Khaá¹Âëb al-BaghdÃÂdë, Ibn ÿAsÃÂkir, al-ḤÃÂkim al-Tirmidhë, al-ḤÃÂkim al-NësÃÂbà «rë's TÃÂrëkh NësÃÂbà «r, Ibn al-NajjÃÂr al-BaghdÃÂdë's Dhayl TÃÂrëkh BaghdÃÂd, and al-DaylamëâÂÂs Musnad al-Firdaws are classified as weak (á¸Âaÿëf).
In assessing hadiths as á¹£aḥëḥ, ḥasan, or á¸Âaÿëf, al-Suyà «á¹Âë used the symbols (õÃÂ), (ÃÂ), and (ö) respectively. However, due to the carelessness of copyists and printers, these symbols were sometimes written incorrectly. Therefore, as ÿAbd al-RaÃ¾à «f al-MunÃÂwë noted, it is not reliable to depend solely on these markings. A poem summarizing the symbols used in the workâÂÂtitled á¸Âawþ al-Qabas al-Munër li-Rumà «z RijÃÂl al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër was composed in thirty-six verses by Aḥmad b. Makkë al-Ḥamawë al-Ḥasanë in 1056 AH (1646 CE) and published by Muḥammad BÃÂqir ÿUlwÃÂn in Majallat Maÿhad al-Makhá¹Âà «á¹ÂÃÂt al-ÿArabiyya (Cairo, 1975, vol. XXI, pp. 142âÂÂ147). ÿUlwÃÂn had earlier published another article titled ThalÃÂthu ArÃÂjëz fë Rumà «z al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër in the same journal.
According to al-Suyà «á¹Âë, the hadiths in al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër are generally á¹£aḥëḥ or ḥasan, though some weak ones are included. Some scholars, however, claim that fabricated (mawá¸Âà «Ã¿) hadiths are also present. NÃÂá¹£ir al-Dën al-AlbÃÂnë explains the inclusion of some hadiths that al-Suyà «á¹Âë himself labelled mawá¸Âà «Ã¿ in his al-LaþÃÂlë al-Maá¹£nà «Ã¿a and its supplement as due to al-Suyà «á¹Âë not having had the opportunity to evaluate them properly. The number of hadiths in the collection is variously reported as 10,031 or 10,934, but Yà «suf b. IsmÃÂÿël al-NabahÃÂnë, after a careful count, determined the correct number to be 10,010.
Independent works have been written to verify the authenticity levels of the hadiths in al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër. In FayḠal-Qadër, al-MunÃÂwë not only provided commentary on the text but also examined the chains of transmission, carefully evaluating and scrutinizing the authenticity of the ḥadëths. ÿAlë b. Aḥmad b. Saÿëd, known as BàSabrayn, gathered the sound narrations in his IthÃÂf al-NÃÂqid al-Baṣër bi-Khuá¹£à «á¹£ á¹¢aḥëḥ (bi-Qawiyy) AḥÃÂdëth al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër, completed in 1266 AH (1850 CE). Among more recent studies is that of NÃÂá¹£ir al-Dën al-AlbÃÂnë, who, based on al-Fatḥ al-Kabër, evaluated 8,202 narrations as á¹£aḥëḥ or ḥasan and published them in two volumes under the title á¹¢aḥëḥ al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër wa ZiyÃÂdatuh (Beirut, 1406/1986), while classifying 6,469 narrations as âÂÂweak,â âÂÂvery weak,â or âÂÂfabricatedâ and publishing them in six volumes as á¸Âaÿëf al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër wa ZiyÃÂdatuh (Beirut, 1398/1978). Abà «âÂÂl-FayḠIbn al-á¹¢iddëq al-GhumÃÂrë also compiled 453 fabricated hadiths allegedly found in al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër in a small book titled al-Mughër ÿalàal-AḥÃÂdëth al-Mawá¸Âà «Ã¿a fë al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër (Beirut, 1402/1982).
Al-Suyà «á¹Âë later added 4,440 hadiths in a supplement titled ZiyÃÂdat al-JÃÂmiÿ, which Yà «suf al-NabahÃÂnë arranged alphabetically within their respective places in the main text. This expanded version was published in three volumes under the title al-Fatḥ al-Kabër fë á¸Âamm al-ZiyÃÂdah ilàal-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër (Cairo, 1351/1932). Al-Muttaqë al-Hindë rearranged the hadiths of al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër and ZiyÃÂdat al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër according to jurisprudential chapters and titled his work Manhaj al-ÿUmmÃÂl fë Sunan al-AqwÃÂl.
Given its importance, it is appropriate to briefly provide information about the FayḠal-Qadër commentary. As is known, many commentaries have been written on Suyuti's el-Jami' al-Saghir. The principal commentaries (shurà «á¸¥) on al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër are as follows:
Al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër was first printed in Cairo in 1286 AH and has since been reprinted many times. The Cairo edition published together with FayḠal-Qadër is also considered reliable. Because of its short hadith texts, alphabetical order, concise indication of sources by symbols, and other features, the book became highly practical and widely used. Ottoman scholars held the work in great esteem and counted it among their primary hadith sources. For instance, Mehmed ÿÃÂrif Bey selected all but one of the hadiths in his 1001 Hadiths from al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër. Mehmed Zihnë Efendi, in his work al-ḤaqÃÂþiq mimmàfë al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër wa al-MashÃÂriq min ḥadëth khayr al-khalÃÂþiq, wrote the biographies of the Companions mentioned as transmitters in al-JÃÂmiÿ al-á¹¢aghër (Istanbul, 1311 AH), though the section from the letter âÂÂá¸ÂÃÂdâ (ö) onward was never published.
As-Saghir is an abridgement of al-Suyuti's larger work al-Jami' al-Kabir. His attempt to compile all of the remaining hadiths in one massive collection, the Jami al-Kabir, was incomplete when he died. What remained was published in 30 large volumes, showcasing around nine to ten alphabetic orderings of the prophetic traditions.
Which in turn was further ordered and arranged in al-Mutaqqi al-Hindi's work Kanz al-Ummal.