AbhimÃÂna (Sanskrit:à ¤ à ¤Âà ¤¿à ¤®à ¤¾à ¤¨) variously means â pride, false prestige, desire, an impression, the conception, by self-conception, from the misconception; in Hindu philosophy, it means â prideful attachment of "I-sense" i.e. man (to think) + mÃÂna (too much); it also means â identify or identification and also refers to selfish conviction, for abhimÃÂna is the function of ahamkara (ego) as the state of mind which interprets experience as " mine ".
The psychological sense of "I" am experience is ahamkÃÂra which comes about as and when owing to avidya , Brahman, the Universal transcendental Self, is distinguished from the Jiva, the empirical individual self. Sanga (one's associations), mamkÃÂra (attachments) and moha (attractions) are the three aspects of abhimÃÂna (ego-consciousness) which produces katrtva (the sense agency) as the deliberate consciousness of nià Âcaya (decision) without which there would be no difference between the self and other material objects; buddhi (intellect), which manifests according to vÃÂsanÃÂs (impressions), is deliberate decision.
Shankara tells us that the mind or manas dwells in the organs and body as aham (ego) with abhimÃÂna âÂ à ¤ à ¤¹à ¤®à ¤¿à ¤¤à ¥Âà ¤¯à ¤Âà ¤¿à ¤®à ¤¾à ¤¨à ¥Âà ¤¨ in the reflected brightness of the atman as the kartà(doer) and the bhoktà(enjoyer) experiencing all three states of consciousness but the atman, the witness of everything, limited by buddhi is not tainted by anything that buddhi does âÂ à ¤ à ¤¶à ¥Âà ¤·à ¤¸à ¤¾à ¤Âà ¥Âà ¤·à ¥ for the taint of action attaches only to the actor, the ÃÂtman does not act. This abhimÃÂna or identification with names and forms dependent on the perishable body, as also with the subtle body, needs to be given up entirely in order to realize akhanda ÃÂnanda (inseparable bliss). VÃÂcaspati Mià Âra explains that it is ahamkÃÂra (empirical ego) which presides over the objects intuited by the sense-organs and then definitely perceived by the mind; and that the sense-organ intuits the object, manas reflects on it, ahamkÃÂra appropriates it and finally buddhi (intellect) resolves which way the intended action must proceed.
AbhimÃÂna is the false sense of "I" and "mine"; it is because of the emphatic identity (abhimÃÂna) with one's body etc., that there is pramata (cognising subject) and involvement with pramÃÂnas (acts or processes of knowing, perception, inference and the rest) owing to functioning of the senses as resulting from avidyà(ignorance) and resulting in bondage. Examined from the level of social consciousness, ÃÂtman or the transcendental consciousness is certainly essential for man's being but upadhis (limitations) are its accidental parts the self-identification with which gives rise to abhimÃÂna (identification with the body) that makes man a socio-spiritual being subjective and objective, both, and becomes the basis for his adhikÃÂra (social and ritual eligibility). According to the Shudha Advaita school of Vallabha Acharya, saguna means â one having the abhimÃÂna of gunas (forming part of one's own self), the nirguna is one having no abhimÃÂna.
The Lakshmi Tantra tells us that "ahamkÃÂra which is a cognitive-sense, is identical with abhimÃÂna" and "the awareness of the knower in relating time and place to himself is called abhimÃÂna". For most people desiring success, incidental gains and weighed down by sense of self-respect abhimÃÂna is a virtue but for those who are wise and contented, it is mere pride associated with arrogance. Bhoja, who outlined the theory of Rasa (experience of delight), attaches great importance to abhimÃÂna or ahankÃÂra (ego). He states that the rasika who has rasa in him has it because of sringara (peak), ahamkÃÂra and abhimÃÂna, enjoyable as a guna of his atman; he uses the term abhimÃÂna in a good sense. From ahamkÃÂra rises abhimÃÂna that originates sringÃÂra, and from abhimÃÂna rises rati (love, amorousness), and from rati are originated all rasas.